|
||||||||
EE Vincent/Sharon/Kim at the Albert |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,735
|
EE Vincent/Sharon/Kim at the Albert
Will this ever work? Vincent did seem to have some respect for the name Den Watts
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,350
|
Shame they don't still have the R&R set. When Ronnie suggested giving it to Sharon it got me thinking how good Vincent could be there instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,646
|
Musical businesses in EE never make sense. This story could be interesting though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Winter is coming.
Posts: 13,304
|
Quote:
Musical businesses in EE never make sense.
Really like Vincent in the Albert - and I never thought I'd say this, but he makes Kim bearable
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,646
|
Quote:
Indeed. Does anyone know what Max does now? He owns the house outright but what will he pay bills with?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: EastLUNDERN
Posts: 6,247
|
It could work. It would seem Mrs Mitchell and Mr Hubbard have a common enemy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Plymouth Devon
Posts: 12,466
|
This will be a laugh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9,008
|
I'm struggling to see why Vincent would agree to the deal? Sharon has no proof that she didn't sign the contract, her fingerprints are on it now, and Phil isn't going to admit to fraud.
I cringed at Sharon begging Vincent for it back, anyone would think she'd slaved away for years to get it when it was bought for her by Phil. Kim will want to make the place really tacky. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 871
|
Quote:
I'm struggling to see why Vincent would agree to the deal? Sharon has no proof that she didn't sign the contract, her fingerprints are on it now, and Phil isn't going to admit to fraud.
I cringed at Sharon begging Vincent for it back, anyone would think she'd slaved away for years to get it when it was bought for her by Phil. Kim will want to make the place really tacky. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9,008
|
Quote:
She has been conned out of her business so she has every right to make a deal with Vincent. She loves the Albert and it was her who changed it from a salon to a bar. She decorated the place and was landlady for over a year. Vincent agreed because Sharon has her own contacts and her suppliers are cheap. He was really fascinated when she mentioned Den Watts.
Not even sure why the Mitchells are bowing down to Vincent as he has no proof re: Carl. Vincent has made a mug of all of them, hope he doesn't mug himself off by giving half of it back when there's no proof Sharon's signature was forged. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:34.


