DS Forums

 
 

EE Vincent/Sharon/Kim at the Albert


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2015, 22:10
Aaron_Silver
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,735

Will this ever work? Vincent did seem to have some respect for the name Den Watts
Aaron_Silver is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 02-06-2015, 22:33
Lulz77
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,350
Shame they don't still have the R&R set. When Ronnie suggested giving it to Sharon it got me thinking how good Vincent could be there instead.
Lulz77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 22:36
0...0
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,646
Musical businesses in EE never make sense. This story could be interesting though.
0...0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 22:38
J-B
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Winter is coming.
Posts: 13,304
Musical businesses in EE never make sense.
Indeed. Does anyone know what Max does now? He owns the house outright but what will he pay bills with?

Really like Vincent in the Albert - and I never thought I'd say this, but he makes Kim bearable
J-B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 22:40
0...0
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,646
Indeed. Does anyone know what Max does now? He owns the house outright but what will he pay bills with?
Webcam butt dancing for Sorcha?
0...0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 22:47
GeekInfected
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: EastLUNDERN
Posts: 6,247
It could work. It would seem Mrs Mitchell and Mr Hubbard have a common enemy.
GeekInfected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 22:51
Adrian_Ward1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Plymouth Devon
Posts: 12,466
This will be a laugh.
Adrian_Ward1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 23:06
LHolmes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9,008
I'm struggling to see why Vincent would agree to the deal? Sharon has no proof that she didn't sign the contract, her fingerprints are on it now, and Phil isn't going to admit to fraud.

I cringed at Sharon begging Vincent for it back, anyone would think she'd slaved away for years to get it when it was bought for her by Phil.

Kim will want to make the place really tacky.
LHolmes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 23:09
ALowsley
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 871
I'm struggling to see why Vincent would agree to the deal? Sharon has no proof that she didn't sign the contract, her fingerprints are on it now, and Phil isn't going to admit to fraud.

I cringed at Sharon begging Vincent for it back, anyone would think she'd slaved away for years to get it when it was bought for her by Phil.

Kim will want to make the place really tacky.
She has been conned out of her business so she has every right to make a deal with Vincent. She loves the Albert and it was her who changed it from a salon to a bar. She decorated the place and was landlady for over a year. Vincent agreed because Sharon has her own contacts and her suppliers are cheap. He was really fascinated when she mentioned Den Watts.
ALowsley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 23:21
LHolmes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9,008
She has been conned out of her business so she has every right to make a deal with Vincent. She loves the Albert and it was her who changed it from a salon to a bar. She decorated the place and was landlady for over a year. Vincent agreed because Sharon has her own contacts and her suppliers are cheap. He was really fascinated when she mentioned Den Watts.
I think Phil deserves to lose a business after what he did to Max. He could've taken just the Arches back, proving himself the better man, but instead chose to go one step further and show he is no better.

Not even sure why the Mitchells are bowing down to Vincent as he has no proof re: Carl. Vincent has made a mug of all of them, hope he doesn't mug himself off by giving half of it back when there's no proof Sharon's signature was forged.
LHolmes is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:53.