DS Forums

 
 

Chase was wearing a collar with his name clearly on it!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-06-2015, 17:11
njp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21,645
What this? More rubbish posted as if it's fact?
It just isn't credible that people would feel so incensed by this "deception" that an act they previously thought should win instead becomes reviled and they think the police should be called in.

So that's either a tiny group of weirdos, who can be dismissed as statistically irrelevant, or a rather larger group of sore losers with some peculiar ideas about ethics.
njp is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 03-06-2015, 17:21
dellzincht
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,636
Yes it's exactly that - the whole thing set up and designed to deceive from the start.

I mean the extra dog wasn't shown at the end for the very reason that they were trying to past it off as one dog.

All these excuses that are only just appearing are just that, excuses. And how many noticed at the actual time of payment that there was collar with a different name on it or the dogs face markings have changed? No one at all! (OK make it 0.0000001% of people noticed just to cover the pedants)

So at the time of payment, due to the actions that had taken place in the act, people were misled. That's against the law, not a matter of opinion.
You really need to stop saying the word "law" as you clearly don't know what it means.

For the millionth time, no laws have been broken!
dellzincht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2015, 17:25
myscimitar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
The point of the vote was, you voted on the entertainment value. NOT which dog did it.
Not true I'm my case, voted as I thought that was ONE clever dog, if it was just the entertainment ie story, put a human in a dog outfit run the show and see how many votes she would have got...,
myscimitar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2015, 17:44
njp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21,645
Not true I'm my case, voted as I thought that was ONE clever dog, if it was just the entertainment ie story, put a human in a dog outfit run the show and see how many votes she would have got...,
You claim you voted for an act where you thought the very stunt you are now complaining was performed by the wrong dog was cruel?

I am happy with most dog tricks, but making a dog walk across narrow ropes high up was just in my view, to much, the dog looked nervous and not that happy?
Didn't happen, did it?
njp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2015, 18:00
IsThisHappiness
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 7,126
Is this really the straw they are clutching at?

The first dog was put in at the bottom one side and taken out the other side totally and deliberately to make it look like one dog. Plus the fact that the other dog was not brought on at the end clearly show they intent to deceive that it was just one dog.

NOTHING is going to change that.
Except that it clearly had it's name on the collar to show it wasn't the same dog?
IsThisHappiness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2015, 18:25
myscimitar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
Except that it clearly had it's name on the collar to show it wasn't the same dog?
Silly me,,I didn't have a a way of blowing up the TV screen unlike the Paper.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/b...earing-5806145
myscimitar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2015, 18:32
Anya D
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,829
Except that it clearly had it's name on the collar to show it wasn't the same dog?
I'm not usually argumentative, but again I would challenge the use of the word "clearly".

Viewed on the tv, in real time, the collar and name were not clearly shown.
Anya D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2015, 19:48
grondagronda
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 663
Seeing as some have been quick to try and accuse Jules of deception, I think it's only fair to point out just as quick, that it's now come to light that Chase the 'stunt dog' was wearing a collar with his name clearly on it in huge letters, but viewers failed to notice it. Therefore he was quite clearly NOT meant to be passed of as Matisse as people have been claiming:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/b...earing-5806145
Clearly your definition of HUGE and mine are totally different. I watched the footage in the link you posted and could barely see the collar, let alone the HUUUUUGE words apparently written on it.

But silly me. It's also my fault that I didn't have x-ray vision so I could see one dog being secretly switched for another.
grondagronda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 16:28
myscimitar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
Clearly your definition of HUGE and mine are totally different. I watched the footage in the link you posted and could barely see the collar, let alone the HUUUUUGE words apparently written on it.

But silly me. It's also my fault that I didn't have x-ray vision so I could see one dog being secretly switched for another.
Agree, the fact she changed the dogs behind a panel smacks of a con, and I can't believe anyone would look or notice the tiny coller name. Not that they would look at it anyway as re the changing behind the panel was meant to make people believe it was the same dog.,
myscimitar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 17:16
njp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21,645
Agree, the fact she changed the dogs behind a panel smacks of a con, and I can't believe anyone would look or notice the tiny coller name. Not that they would look at it anyway as re the changing behind the panel was meant to make people believe it was the same dog.,
You really need to get a grip.
njp is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:35.