I know I am. Poll to follow
Results:Are you sick of hearing about the dog act?
Yes
55 (80.88%)
No
13 (19.12%)
Voters: 68. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?
Are you sick of reading about the dog act?
1 of 2
Yes. People are saying they've been robbed in broad daylight and it's just silly now. Some of the threads are going round and round in circles.
No, I'm still undecided and I'd like to hear more - a LOT more - from both sides so I can make a fully-formed opinion.
I'm embarrassed more than anything. This is Great Britain. Where the winners of a tacky TV talent contest becomes news.
Yes, Jules hasn't done anything wrong yet she's being made out to be a criminal and had her win tainted
. I feel very sorry for her, and it's a wonder anybody ever applies to go on anything that will put them in the eyes and at the mercy of the public. If they don't like you they go at you like a pack of hounds after a fox
.
. I feel very sorry for her, and it's a wonder anybody ever applies to go on anything that will put them in the eyes and at the mercy of the public. If they don't like you they go at you like a pack of hounds after a fox.
Yes.
I rather liked the act and I'm glad Jules and her dog's won. I don't feel cheated at all about the fact a Third dog was also involved. I blame the producers there.
I rather liked the act and I'm glad Jules and her dog's won. I don't feel cheated at all about the fact a Third dog was also involved. I blame the producers there.
No . As someone who didn't watch the show I only became aware since it made headline news .
If you want my unbiased opinion it certainly was wrong to pretend before they performed, that only one dog was responsible for the act shown in the final .
Surely also Cowell and the other judges would know what was going on in the studio . The public only get shown what the producer wants to be shown .
If you want my unbiased opinion it certainly was wrong to pretend before they performed, that only one dog was responsible for the act shown in the final .
Surely also Cowell and the other judges would know what was going on in the studio . The public only get shown what the producer wants to be shown .
Originally Posted by Paace:
“No . As someone who didn't watch the show I only became aware since it made headline news .
If you want my unbiased opinion it certainly was wrong to pretend before they performed, that only one dog was responsible for the act shown in the final .
Surely also Cowell and the other judges would know what was going on in the studio . The public only get shown what the producer wants to be shown .”
“No . As someone who didn't watch the show I only became aware since it made headline news .
If you want my unbiased opinion it certainly was wrong to pretend before they performed, that only one dog was responsible for the act shown in the final .
Surely also Cowell and the other judges would know what was going on in the studio . The public only get shown what the producer wants to be shown .”
But you will not be allowed that opinion. You will be told that you are wrong. You will be labelled a troll. Her fans won't be able to challenge your valid points...
...and then like on this very thread they will say they are sick of it as it's going round in circles. They just refuse to see that they are causing it to go round in circles.
It really is worse than One Direction's followers refusing to see any negative at all EVEA!
Originally Posted by Paace:
“No . As someone who didn't watch the show I only became aware since it made headline news .
If you want my unbiased opinion it certainly was wrong to pretend before they performed, that only one dog was responsible for the act shown in the final .
Surely also Cowell and the other judges would know what was going on in the studio . The public only get shown what the producer wants to be shown .”
“No . As someone who didn't watch the show I only became aware since it made headline news .
If you want my unbiased opinion it certainly was wrong to pretend before they performed, that only one dog was responsible for the act shown in the final .
Surely also Cowell and the other judges would know what was going on in the studio . The public only get shown what the producer wants to be shown .”
You should probably watch the show before spouting your opinion of what happened, mate.
Originally Posted by Old Endeavour:
“You will be labelled a troll. Her fans won't be able to challenge your valid points...”
“You will be labelled a troll. Her fans won't be able to challenge your valid points...”
Your points aren't valid though?
Originally Posted by Old Endeavour:
“...and then like on this very thread they will say they are sick of it as it's going round in circles. They just refuse to see that they are causing it to go round in circles.
”
“...and then like on this very thread they will say they are sick of it as it's going round in circles. They just refuse to see that they are causing it to go round in circles.
”
When you have some valid points. Do let us all know.
TBF you're perfectly entitled to feel it was "wrong" to have two dogs playing the same character in different parts of the skit.
It doesn't mean anything though, other than that's your opinion. It doesn't mean anyone else should care, or that suddenly because of your opinion the competition is null and void, or basically anything.
Personally, I don't care. It was her dog, she trained it. It's not like it was a stunt dog that she had just hired for the part. That would have been over the line, I think we can probably all agree on that.
It doesn't mean anything though, other than that's your opinion. It doesn't mean anyone else should care, or that suddenly because of your opinion the competition is null and void, or basically anything.
Personally, I don't care. It was her dog, she trained it. It's not like it was a stunt dog that she had just hired for the part. That would have been over the line, I think we can probably all agree on that.
Originally Posted by pjc229:
“TBF you're perfectly entitled to feel it was "wrong" to have two dogs playing the same character in different parts of the skit.
It doesn't mean anything though, other than that's your opinion. It doesn't mean anyone else should care, or that suddenly because of your opinion the competition is null and void, or basically anything.
Personally, I don't care. It was her dog, she trained it. It's not like it was a stunt dog that she had just hired for the part. That would have been over the line, I think we can probably all agree on that.”
“TBF you're perfectly entitled to feel it was "wrong" to have two dogs playing the same character in different parts of the skit.
It doesn't mean anything though, other than that's your opinion. It doesn't mean anyone else should care, or that suddenly because of your opinion the competition is null and void, or basically anything.
Personally, I don't care. It was her dog, she trained it. It's not like it was a stunt dog that she had just hired for the part. That would have been over the line, I think we can probably all agree on that.”
And the point many of you fail every time to grasp is:
There is nothing at all wrong with having 'two dogs playing the same character in different parts of the skit'
What is VERY wrong is for it to be covered up and deliberately so. It was designed and executed to deceive - That is what is wrong. And that happened! The producers have admitted it. It's valid!
1 of 2
