• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Britain's Got Talent
Stop blaming Jules
<<
<
6 of 6
>>
>
Dan R
12-06-2015
What you anti-Cowell idiots don't consider is that if there was intent to deceive Jules wouldn't have openly said it in a live TV interview.
But common sense is out of the question for BGT haters.
Kromm
12-06-2015
Originally Posted by Dan R:
“What you anti-Cowell idiots don't consider is that if there was intent to deceive Jules wouldn't have openly said it in a live TV interview.
But common sense is out of the question for BGT haters. ”

That NEITHER proves nor disproves Simon's knowledge or lack thereof. It's completely neutral, because just because Jules might not have discussed it publicly doesn't equate to proof it's the opposite. It's a logical fallacy to act like it does.
CollieWobbles
13-06-2015
Originally Posted by Lyceum:
“There are some posters who don't get logic and common sense so asking them to get sarcasm really is pushing it.”

myscimitar
16-06-2015
Now Ofcom are looking into this, hopefully justice will be done, and has she once said sorry, I don't think so, at least BGT did that.
spikewoman
16-06-2015
Originally Posted by myscimitar:
“Now Ofcom are looking into this, hopefully justice will be done, and has she once said sorry, I don't think so, at least BGT did that.”

But BGT only said sorry because Jules was the one who outed the situation in the first place. If she hadn't and nobody was the wiser BGT would have kept Schtum would they not?
myscimitar
16-06-2015
Originally Posted by spikewoman:
“But BGT only said sorry because Jules was the one who outed the situation in the first place. If she hadn't and nobody was the wiser BGT would have kept Schtum would they not?”

Maybe she new the papers where onto,her, so had to say the next day, and anyway this was after she got her hands on the huge prize money.
njp
16-06-2015
Originally Posted by myscimitar:
“Maybe she new the papers where onto,her, so had to say the next day, and anyway this was after she got her hands on the huge prize money.”

You could work that up into quite a conspiracy.

Still, the money isn't coming back, and you won't get some sort of financial reward for not having voted for her. Welcome to reality.
myscimitar
19-06-2015
Originally Posted by njp:
“You could work that up into quite a conspiracy.

Still, the money isn't coming back, and you won't get some sort of financial reward for not having voted for her. Welcome to reality.”

I don't want a reward, just hope Ofcom rule this was a scam and justice is served.
Sarah Anne
19-06-2015
Originally Posted by myscimitar:
“I don't want a reward, just hope Ofcom rule this was a scam and justice is served.”

Justice is served?
This is so over the top and I don't think you even know what justice is!
<<
<
6 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map