|
||||||||
Chase's name CAN be seen at normal viewing |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Another time, another place..
Posts: 24,629
|
Chase's name CAN be seen at normal viewing
People are saying you can't see Chase's name on the collar except in the blown up newspaper images. After rewatching it you can see on normal viewing that it says Chase, both dogs are wearing collars with their names on, both are viewable enough to see they are different:
http://i1272.photobucket.com/albums/...psquhndzn6.png http://i1272.photobucket.com/albums/...pslakq9zz3.png I've paused them, but you can see them without pausing them too, I watched them on YouTube on an iPad min and it's completely obvious so a large tv screen should show it up even more. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Good spot. I think we all need a trip to the Optician's.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Another time, another place..
Posts: 24,629
|
She'd obviously tried to make it as noticeable as possible that it was two different dogs. Short of dressing them up or putting a coat with their names on them, which could be potentially dangerous for a dog on a tightrope, and of course she'd then be called cruel for dressing her dogs up. It shows clearly though that she was not trying to pass it off as one dog as some are saying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 663
|
I'm clearly going insane.
I can't see the dog's name. If anyone else can see the dogs' names in those photos, then I relent and will be taken to the funny farm forthwith. Also, weirdly, I didn't actually watch the performance frame by frame. Anyone else? If so, again, off to the funny farm for me. Toodle pip! On a serious note: Yes, I get the point that the owner labelled her dogs. Fine. That's not the issue here. The issue is the deception intrinsic in the presentation of the show. But anyway.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Another time, another place..
Posts: 24,629
|
You can clearly see they are two different names, and you don't need to pause it, go on YouTube, find the act then look at the dog whilst it's on the rope, about 1.6 minutes in. If that wasn't enough when the dog faces you just before getting on the rope it is totally obvious it's not the same dog as it has a much narrower blaze up its face.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 663
|
I've looked at it again.
And looking at it incredibly closely, focussing entirely on the collar (although why I would be doing that during the actual show, I don't know), but yes, I can just about make out some letters that look like SE or ASE on Chase's collar. However...and this is a key point....the dog collars are identical and a casual viewer, like most ITV viewers, would have just assumed they were the same dog, and that SE was part of MATISSE. They're wearing identical black collars - apart from their names. Had one collar been black and one white, then yes, I think, as a casual viewer, I might have noticed that difference. But not otherwise, sorry. I'm just being honest. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Another time, another place..
Posts: 24,629
|
Quote:
I've looked at it again.
And looking at it incredibly closely, focussing entirely on the collar (although why I would be doing that during the actual show, I don't know), but yes, I can just about make out some letters that look like SE or ASE on Chase's collar. However...and this is a key point....the dog collars are identical and a casual viewer, like most ITV viewers, would have just assumed they were the same dog, and that SE was part of MATISSE. They're wearing identical black collars - apart from their names. Had one collar been black and one white, then yes, I think, as a casual viewer, I might have noticed that difference. But not otherwise, sorry. I'm just being honest. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27,092
|
What does it matter? The viewer will not be looking for a different collar when watching a dog entertaining. They'd be engrossed in the entertainment instead of looking at technicalities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,569
|
Quote:
I'm clearly going insane.
I can't see the dog's name. If anyone else can see the dogs' names in those photos, then I relent and will be taken to the funny farm forthwith. Also, weirdly, I didn't actually watch the performance frame by frame. Anyone else? If so, again, off to the funny farm for me. Toodle pip! On a serious note: Yes, I get the point that the owner labelled her dogs. Fine. That's not the issue here. The issue is the deception intrinsic in the presentation of the show. But anyway.... I'm finding the whole thing hilarious now how far some of the supporters are going to 'prove' their point. Its actually quite entertaining within itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
I'm clearly going insane.
I can't see the dog's name. If anyone else can see the dogs' names in those photos, then I relent and will be taken to the funny farm forthwith. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,733
|
Quote:
I can see the dogs' names. Off to the funny farm you go, then!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
It is hard to see, and I doubt many would be able to see it on live tv when they're watching the act
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,569
|
Quote:
They would if people were looking for it.
![]() ![]() This defending is going a little bit too far. Night
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Yes cos that is what people spend their time doing. Checking out a dog collar.
![]() ![]() This defending is going a little bit too far. Night ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,733
|
Quote:
They would if people were looking for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Yeah but why would they
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,569
|
Quote:
Yeah but why would they
![]() ![]() ![]() I'm going now. Really Night again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,733
|
Quote:
If they spotted letters on the dog's collar. Or were trying to work out how the dog got there so fast.
I'm sure if this was UDI you'd be up in arms insulting everyone |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Yes but answer the question why would you be doing that?
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,733
|
Quote:
To work out how the dog got to the tightrope so fast. People can only blame themselves for not realising it was Chase because it was in plain sight. Nobody was conned at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Another time, another place..
Posts: 24,629
|
Quote:
What does it matter? The viewer will not be looking for a different collar when watching a dog entertaining. They'd be engrossed in the entertainment instead of looking at technicalities.
Quote:
It is hard to see, and I doubt many would be able to see it on live tv when they're watching the act
Quote:
To work out how the dog got to the tightrope so fast. People can only blame themselves for not realising it was Chase because it was in plain sight. Nobody was conned at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
That is not plain sight and people just assume the dig would run up a ramp or something. Your argument is so flawed and pathetic, seriously give it up
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,350
|
Quote:
However...and this is a key point....the dog collars are identical and a casual viewer, like most ITV viewers, would have just assumed they were the same dog, and that SE was part of MATISSE.
They're wearing identical black collars - apart from their names. Had one collar been black and one white, then yes, I think, as a casual viewer, I might have noticed that difference. But not otherwise, sorry. I'm just being honest. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
It is hard to see, and I doubt many would be able to see it on live tv when they're watching the act
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9,746
|
so you have started this thread when you have already started a thread entitled "Chase was wearing a collar with his name clearly on it!"
Why are just two of you spamming the forum with multiple threads on the same subject and shouting down anyone who feels that they have been conned and defrauded in the voting just because you two are fans of the act? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16.



