|
||||||||
Jules shoud have used her Crufts 2014 act which was far better |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,487
|
Jules shoud have used her Crufts 2014 act which was far better
She should have used her Crufts act which was far better and there was no need for a stunt double .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXVx2kcDfhc |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cathedral of Motorcycle Racing
Posts: 2,410
|
She already used most of that routine in the semi-finals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
She should have used her Crufts act which was far better and there was no need for a stunt double .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXVx2kcDfhc |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Another time, another place..
Posts: 24,629
|
That routine was pretty much used in the semi finals, but altered a little to fit the time frame. Your get a bit more time in Crufts than BGT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 17,852
|
Funny isn't it. At the audition stage she came on as "I'm not a very good dancer. I'm a woman who has trained my pet dog". Like pudsey for example.
She didn't come on as "I'm a professional dog trainer with a pack of proffessional trained dogs". I assume the shows producers knew exactly what was going on when they conned the audience |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Another time, another place..
Posts: 24,629
|
Quote:
Funny isn't it. At the audition stage she came on as "I'm not a very good dancer. I'm a woman who has trained my pet dog". Like pudsey for example.
She didn't come on as "I'm a professional dog trainer with a pack of proffessional trained dogs". I assume the shows producers knew exactly what was going on when they conned the audience |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,202
|
She also didn't say anything remotely like "I'm just a woman who has trained my pet dog". The distinction she made was that she couldn't (/doesn't) dance, which is what made her act different to Ashleigh & Pudsey, in that she acts out stories instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,202
|
Quote:
Pudsey wasn't just a pet dog either. Ashleigh's family are dog trainers, and Pudsey has done heelwork to music at Crufts, is an agility champion and they were in the young kennel club. They were no more novices than Jules is. That young ninja girl has won tons of competitions, she's not just a young girl messing about with a sword either. Nowhere does it say you hav to be a novice to take part in BGT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
That routine was pretty much used in the semi finals, but altered a little to fit the time frame. Your get a bit more time in Crufts than BGT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,636
|
Quote:
Do you now feel outrage at being conned by Pudsey, gemma-the-husky? They made you think it was "just a girl and her pet dog" and it wasn't at all? Please, let it out. Vent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 17,852
|
Well I had no idea of what you mentioned about pudsey.
Thats the thing, I suppose. The winner is just a debating point, and in truth it hardly matters to me. But for some reason I would rather see Paul Potts, or Susan Boyle win. Or jamie raven. It's the difference between saying at the audition that you are a professional trying to get a break, compared with the deceit (sort of) of concealing the fact that you are semi-pro at least. In my opinion. And I think the idea of non brits competing and winning BGT is little short of ridiculous. I have no idea how attraction won. I would never have allowed them in, let alone voted for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,636
|
Attraction won because BGT producers researched them and then invited them onto the show, where they showed us a fresh new act that the public loved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Another time, another place..
Posts: 24,629
|
Quote:
Well I had no idea of what you mentioned about pudsey.
Thats the thing, I suppose. The winner is just a debating point, and in truth it hardly matters to me. But for some reason I would rather see Paul Potts, or Susan Boyle win. Or jamie raven. It's the difference between saying at the audition that you are a professional trying to get a break, compared with the deceit (sort of) of concealing the fact that you are semi-pro at least. In my opinion. And I think the idea of non brits competing and winning BGT is little short of ridiculous. I have no idea how attraction won. I would never have allowed them in, let alone voted for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Well I had no idea of what you mentioned about pudsey.
Thats the thing, I suppose. The winner is just a debating point, and in truth it hardly matters to me. But for some reason I would rather see Paul Potts, or Susan Boyle win. Or jamie raven. It's the difference between saying at the audition that you are a professional trying to get a break, compared with the deceit (sort of) of concealing the fact that you are semi-pro at least. In my opinion. And I think the idea of non brits competing and winning BGT is little short of ridiculous. I have no idea how attraction won. I would never have allowed them in, let alone voted for them. We know they do it, and I really don't care. I would rather see a bunch of pro / semi-pro talent acts who never quite got the break they wanted to appear on BGT, much rather that than folk not good enough for The Voice or X-factor |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
And I think the idea of non brits competing and winning BGT is little short of ridiculous. I have no idea how attraction won. I would never have allowed them in, let alone voted for them. |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 17,852
|
Quote:
IIRC Paul Potts was shown as a lowly mobile phone salesman, not that he had spent some 20 grand on Opera Singing lessons including from Pavrotti himself
We know they do it, and I really don't care. I would rather see a bunch of pro / semi-pro talent acts who never quite got the break they wanted to appear on BGT, much rather that than folk not good enough for The Voice or X-factor
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:34.


