DS Forums

 
 

CS Sophie blaming carla


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-06-2015, 14:43
Lisa_Charlene
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 859

This seems so illogical as maddie ran across an area that was no entry and then got caught by the explosion. It was like the mini bus crash when people blamed steve for sinead when she didn't have her seat belt on
Lisa_Charlene is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 04-06-2015, 15:24
m-river
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 720
Right yeah, the nerve on it?! Never liked sawphie, she was born to whinge
m-river is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 15:33
notdebbiedingle
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: whitby , n yorks
Posts: 10,143
Yes, while I do sympathise with the character & understand her wanting someone to blame, actually Maddie's death was not down to the fire as such, it was down to her own stupidity!!
notdebbiedingle is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 15:40
Hank1234
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,677
Poor Maddie ...
Hank1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 16:22
Jazbaa1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 285
Obviously, Sophie is wrong but almost all of them seem to have convinced themselves that Carla was drunk, passed out and left the candle burning under a lamp. Which to them means that her actions led to the fire.

The fact that Carla had nothing to do with Maddie choosing to walk in front of an explosion seems to be irrelevant to Sophie. It's all about who caused the fire which led to the explosion that killed Maddie.
Jazbaa1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 16:30
pollysue1939
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 380
Obviously, Sophie is wrong but almost all of them seem to have convinced themselves that Carla was drunk, passed out and left the candle burning under a lamp. Which to them means that her actions led to the fire.

The fact that Carla had nothing to do with Maddie choosing to walk in front of an explosion seems to be irrelevant to Sophie. It's all about who caused the fire which led to the explosion that killed Maddie.
Why do soap characters alway believe the lies that are said and never believe the truth?
pollysue1939 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 16:33
swishbaby
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 204
Obviously, Sophie is wrong but almost all of them seem to have convinced themselves that Carla was drunk, passed out and left the candle burning under a lamp. Which to them means that her actions led to the fire.

The fact that Carla had nothing to do with Maddie choosing to walk in front of an explosion seems to be irrelevant to Sophie. It's all about who caused the fire which led to the explosion that killed Maddie.
She was in a rush though as her little brother was about to be kidnapped.

Some people are so heartless.
swishbaby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 16:50
Jazbaa1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 285
Why do soap characters alway believe the lies that are said and never believe the truth?
It's very frustrating.

She was in a rush though as her little brother was about to be kidnapped.

Some people are so heartless.
Yes, Maddie was desperate but I'm only saying what happened. She ignored the police officer or whoever told her she couldn't go through because it was too dangerous and she walked in front of an explosion.
Jazbaa1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 17:18
callumfreeman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mawdsley Street, Weatherfield
Posts: 8,702
Why do soap characters alway believe the lies that are said and never believe the truth?
Maybe Carla should actually try to defend herself, instead of mopping about deluding herself into thinking she was drunk (which I don't recall her being) and leaving the candle lit. She also seems to have forgotten about Tracy making threats earlier that day.
callumfreeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 17:25
sorcha_healy27
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,012
Sophie is always so unpleasant. She needs a Jenny slap
sorcha_healy27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 17:47
Janet Plank
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,175
I hope they soon find out that Tracy was to blame for the fire and Carla gets a few apologies from her neighbours.
.
Janet Plank is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 18:07
barlowconnor
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Leeds
Posts: 15,940
I hope they soon find out that Tracy was to blame for the fire and Carla gets a few apologies from her neighbours.
.
I hope this happens. Tracy deserves to rot in jail.
barlowconnor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 18:31
Seymour Butts
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,170
I hope when Michelle's back she remembers about the missing keys.

Can't be doing with Carla getting the blame for months on end but it's difficult to see how it can be proved Tracy was in her flat
Seymour Butts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 18:36
SULLA
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,101
This seems so illogical as maddie ran across an area that was no entry and then got caught by the explosion. It was like the mini bus crash when people blamed steve for sinead when she didn't have her seat belt on
Based on what she thinks she knows it is logical for her to blame Carla.
SULLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 19:32
JamSandwiches
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 169
Why do soap characters alway believe the lies that are said and never believe the truth?
There'd be no drama otherwise.

I reckon Tracy's going to let slip something about Rob's photo, thus proving she was in the flat that night. Otherwise, I'm not sure what the point of that was?
JamSandwiches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 19:56
Old Man 43
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,583
Based on what she thinks she knows it is logical for her to blame Carla.
Yes from what Sophie has been told Carla left a candle burning which caused the fire. So it is logical for Sophie to blame Carla. Also it is not as if Carla is defending herself.

As for Maddie being to blame for her own death. That may be true but is it any different from Kal or Leanne going into a burning building.

They were all trying to save a young child. Kal and Leanne were trying to save Amy from the fire and Maddie was trying to save Jack from psycho Jenny.

So all in all with the information that they have blaming Carla is reasonable.

One thin I will say is that IMO Brooke Vincent has been playing the grief stricken Sophie very well.

Normally she is very loud especially in confrontations with people like Jenny and Carla.

However this time she is a lot more restrained and comes across much better in the process.
Old Man 43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 20:51
trevor tiger
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22,735
She was in a rush though as her little brother was about to be kidnapped.

Some people are so heartless.
He's not Maddie's brother he's Sophie's step brother. Anyway mightn't it have made more sense to tell the police woman who tried to stop her about his imminent danger rather than run across an area she'd been told to keep back from
trevor tiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 01:42
Mel94
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Coventry, Warwickshire
Posts: 4,930
Ok, Maddie may have part of the blame considering she was told to stay away from the scene but she chose to run over anyway, despite the potential danger. However, no one (including the emergency services) seemed to be aware of the hazard at the builders yard, they were all focused on the fire in the flats. So in Maddie's eyes, she figured she'd be ok as long as she kept away from the fire at the flats, she didn't knowingly walk into an explosion, it only happened as she was near it. Obviously it's annoying watching everyone blame Carla for something she didn't cause, but as far as they're concerned, Kal and Maddie wouldn't have died from their respective deaths if it weren't for her "leaving the candle burning and then passed out drunk" with a child in her flat under her care.
Mel94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 01:43
Mel94
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Coventry, Warwickshire
Posts: 4,930
He's not Maddie's brother he's Sophie's step brother. Anyway mightn't it have made more sense to tell the police woman who tried to stop her about his imminent danger rather than run across an area she'd been told to keep back from
She probably thought the police would faff about with questions and wanting proof rather than heading over to Kevin's house straight away to stop Jenny, which is what the Websters would have done.
Mel94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 02:36
Eurostar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 51,661
Blaming Carla seems extremely harsh. From what we can see, no crime has been been committed here and nor could she have been said to be irresponsible. It's a perfectly reasonable thing to do to light a candle in your own home, even if you are slightly intoxicated....in no way could that be considered as gross negligence (for starters, if the candle was to fall over, you would expect it to snuff itself out instantly). The deaths of Kal and Maddie were completely accidental, they happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time (or chose to place themselves there). Most fires are accidental, so to be talking about blame and guilt is simply wrong.
Eurostar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 03:45
GracieL
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,407
I haven't seen Wednesday episode yet but I take it we're in for a treat of Sophie moaning / whining and Brooke Vincent's fantastic acting

In reality it is Maddie's own stupid fault for getting killed as anyone with half a brain wouldn't walk into a cordoned off area where a big fire is happening no matter the desperation.
GracieL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 08:02
Indeg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,552
He's not Maddie's brother he's Sophie's step brother.
Jack is Sophie's half-brother, not her stepbrother. They share the same father.
Indeg is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 08:16
Maria_Robinson
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,933
This seems so illogical as maddie ran across an area that was no entry and then got caught by the explosion. It was like the mini bus crash when people blamed steve for sinead when she didn't have her seat belt on
I agree, The numpty ran across a cordoned off area when DAH a fire was ranging and she got blown up But any reason for Sophie to be disagreeable to someone with her horse hair ponytail. Same with Leanne and Dumbkal, nobody asked them to be superheros and run into the flat and stick their beaks in. Then standing on the ladder discussing the marraige proposal - some people have mince for brains.
Maria_Robinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 09:19
billio
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,501
The Blaming of Carla is going to get very boring, as well as being annoying, if it goes on for more than a week or so.

Describing Maddy as "the best thing that happened to me", it may be true but it's a very egocentric view; I'd be more concerned about how it felt for Maddy.
billio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 11:28
m-river
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 720
Blaming Carla seems extremely harsh. From what we can see, no crime has been been committed here and nor could she have been said to be irresponsible. It's a perfectly reasonable thing to do to light a candle in your own home, even if you are slightly intoxicated....in no way could that be considered as gross negligence (for starters, if the candle was to fall over, you would expect it to snuff itself out instantly). The deaths of Kal and Maddie were completely accidental, they happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time (or chose to place themselves there). Most fires are accidental, so to be talking about blame and guilt is simply wrong.
Yes it is a crime, it's called manslaughter. If people didn't die then no one would be in trouble but as people died in result of this accident it's now a criminal offence. So yes Carla can go down for it, also manslaughter can go up to atleast 10 years depending what type of circumstances it was
m-river is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:19.