I'm trying to understand what him and Eileen were on about during that conversation. I'm lost
Is Showbiz celibate
He appeared to confirm her insinuation that he hasn't had a good f*cking for 16 years (her words not mine).
I hope his boyfriend wasn't watching.
I hope his boyfriend wasn't watching.
Originally Posted by WhatJoeThinks:
“He appeared to confirm her insinuation that he hasn't had a good f*cking for 16 years (her words not mine).
I hope his boyfriend wasn't watching.”
“He appeared to confirm her insinuation that he hasn't had a good f*cking for 16 years (her words not mine).
I hope his boyfriend wasn't watching.
”
Loool but does that mean he's choosing to be celibate or he's partner isn't very good
Originally Posted by geraldbean:
“Loool but does that mean he's choosing to be celibate or he's partner isn't very good”
“Loool but does that mean he's choosing to be celibate or he's partner isn't very good”
I think she was reaching. Trying to come across as having uncanny intuition. Simon went along with it to flatter her.
Originally Posted by WhatJoeThinks:
“I think she was reaching. Trying to come across as having uncanny intuition. And Simon went along with it to flatter her.”
“I think she was reaching. Trying to come across as having uncanny intuition. And Simon went along with it to flatter her.”
His poor boyfriend then! Wonder if we'll be seeing him on BOTS lol.
I think it was misinterpreted somewhat, as in having dated someone for 16 years he wouldn't mind a good sesh with someone like Marc. Ie a good night. But as she highlighted it wouldn't be worth it (to risk his relationship going after a desire for a one nighter). You'd risk your long term relationship and stability/love, she right afterwards you'd think we'll that wasn't worth it.
Originally Posted by Lou17:
“I think it was misinterpreted somewhat, as in having dated someone for 16 years he wouldn't mind a good sesh with someone like Marc. Ie a good night. But as she highlighted it wouldn't be worth it (to risk his relationship going after a desire for a one nighter). You'd risk your long term relationship and stability/love, she right afterwards you'd think we'll that wasn't worth it.”
“I think it was misinterpreted somewhat, as in having dated someone for 16 years he wouldn't mind a good sesh with someone like Marc. Ie a good night. But as she highlighted it wouldn't be worth it (to risk his relationship going after a desire for a one nighter). You'd risk your long term relationship and stability/love, she right afterwards you'd think we'll that wasn't worth it.
”
Ah.. I must have missed that bit.
Originally Posted by Lou17:
“I think it was misinterpreted somewhat, as in having dated someone for 16 years he wouldn't mind a good sesh with someone like Marc. Ie a good night. But as she highlighted it wouldn't be worth it (to risk his relationship going after a desire for a one nighter). You'd risk your long term relationship and stability/love, she right afterwards you'd think we'll that wasn't worth it.”
“I think it was misinterpreted somewhat, as in having dated someone for 16 years he wouldn't mind a good sesh with someone like Marc. Ie a good night. But as she highlighted it wouldn't be worth it (to risk his relationship going after a desire for a one nighter). You'd risk your long term relationship and stability/love, she right afterwards you'd think we'll that wasn't worth it.
”
Oooooh okay I get it
Originally Posted by WhatJoeThinks:
“I think she was reaching. Trying to come across as having uncanny intuition. Simon went along with it to flatter her.”
“I think she was reaching. Trying to come across as having uncanny intuition. Simon went along with it to flatter her.”
She did that a lot in tonight's episode.
Originally Posted by Lou17:
“I think it was misinterpreted somewhat, as in having dated someone for 16 years he wouldn't mind a good sesh with someone like Marc. Ie a good night. But as she highlighted it wouldn't be worth it (to risk his relationship going after a desire for a one nighter). You'd risk your long term relationship and stability/love, she right afterwards you'd think we'll that wasn't worth it.”
“I think it was misinterpreted somewhat, as in having dated someone for 16 years he wouldn't mind a good sesh with someone like Marc. Ie a good night. But as she highlighted it wouldn't be worth it (to risk his relationship going after a desire for a one nighter). You'd risk your long term relationship and stability/love, she right afterwards you'd think we'll that wasn't worth it.
”
That's how I read it too. The boredom factor of being in a l-t relationship. Not very nice for a partner watching though no matter how enigmatic they were trying to be.
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“That's how I read it too. The boredom factor of being in a l-t relationship. Not very nice for a partner watching though no matter how enigmatic they were trying to be.”
“That's how I read it too. The boredom factor of being in a l-t relationship. Not very nice for a partner watching though no matter how enigmatic they were trying to be.”
Exactly - but I don't see any altruism (yet) in Simon's behaviour .
It seems only about him and the attention HE can get - so no surprise about the 16 yr drought
