|
||||||||
Best Boobs on TV? (Part 3) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#2801 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,799
|
On Ariel Winter she has been fairly open about her breasts, if she didnt feel comfortable she wouldnt mention them.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2802 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 24,017
|
Quote:
Wonkypedia
You can argue whether a picture that has already been published somewhere is included but that is your decision. . |
|
|
|
|
|
#2803 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pontypool, Wales
Posts: 4,339
|
Quote:
Quote:
It does not matter what you think, several of us were just pointing out what the law is in the UK (and most other Western countries).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2804 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 195
|
Rochelle Humes was packing a decent pair on the Xtra Factor last night.
One the subject and I know it's wrong, but doesn't Louisa have a cracking pair......of legs? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2805 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pontypool, Wales
Posts: 4,339
|
Quote:
One the subject and I know it's wrong, but doesn't Louisa have a cracking pair......of legs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2806 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,889
|
Quote:
One the subject and I know it's wrong, but doesn't Louisa have a cracking pair......of legs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2807 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,875
|
Quote:
Rochelle Humes was packing a decent pair on the Xtra Factor last night.
One the subject and I know it's wrong, but doesn't Louisa have a cracking pair......of legs? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2808 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 145
|
Quote:
Louisa Johnson looked beautiful as always on X Factor. Well deserved winner, the full package. Hopefully we see a lot more of her body next year!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2809 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,040
|
Quote:
hang on - how old was Sam Fox when she started doing page 3 ? wasn't she 16 ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2810 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pontypool, Wales
Posts: 4,339
|
Quote:
She is also 17 years old ! I am getting a bit worried as people are keeping suggestions teenagers who are not yet officially adult. I am not going to say any more I said my piece.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2811 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 476
|
Ariel Winter has turned into a gorgeous woman and even post reduction her breasts are still massive as you can see here-
http://i.imgur.com/oiaE5Nm.jpg She really is stunning |
|
|
|
|
|
#2812 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1
|
Ah Ariel, she is spectacular.
She seems as confident as ever, post surgery. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2813 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 58,791
|
Carly Baker seems to be a regular in the Coral ads now
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=carly+baker&tbm=isch |
|
|
|
|
|
#2814 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 9,626
|
Quote:
Carly Baker seems to be a regular in the Coral ads now
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=carly+baker&tbm=isch |
|
|
|
|
|
#2815 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nailsworth, Gloucestershire
Posts: 10,402
|
Quote:
Yes but that's now illegal and so are those images.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2816 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,434
|
Quote:
Somehow I can't imagine the police planning to raid someone's house on the off-chance they may have a kept a photo of Sam Fox on her Page 3 debut...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2817 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nailsworth, Gloucestershire
Posts: 10,402
|
Quote:
I wouldn't be too sure about that bearing in mind recent court cases - police raided Sir Cliff's house in relation to an alleged offence committed 200 miles away when he wasn't even living in it at that time.
As a naturist I always find it a strange paradox that whilst it is perfectly legal for an adult to spend a day with a naked 16-year old female within a non-sexual naturist environment, a beach for example, but to take a single photo of her topless is illegal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2818 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25,465
|
Quote:
However that raid wasn't in relation to a widely available, didn't The Sun sell in the region of 4m a day back then, photo of a 16 year old female posing topless in a newspaper when at the time it was perfectly legal to do so.
As a naturist I always find it a strange paradox that whilst it is perfectly legal for an adult to spend a day with a naked 16-year old female within a non-sexual naturist environment, a beach for example, but to take a single photo of her topless is illegal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2819 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,209
|
Quote:
Somehow I can't imagine the police planning to raid someone's house on the off-chance they may have a kept a photo of Sam Fox on her Page 3 debut...
Quote:
I wouldn't be too sure about that bearing in mind recent court cases - police raided Sir Cliff's house in relation to an alleged offence committed 200 miles away when he wasn't even living in it at that time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2820 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nailsworth, Gloucestershire
Posts: 10,402
|
Quote:
I think it is more complex than that and depending on context but can lead to problems even if a family member - you still reports of people reported to police because they have taken a picture of their baby in the bath. You often see people claiming that is illegal to even take a picture of a child in a normal setting when they just happen to be in the background.
Take the example I used above. Taking a topless photo of a 16-year old is illegal depending on the context in which the photo was taken. If the photo is taken within the context of a naturist environment, e.g. a designated naturist beach, is perfectly legal, and it would be for someone younger as well, and has been shown as such in court. The reality, of course, is no one is going to take such a risk, just in case. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2821 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nailsworth, Gloucestershire
Posts: 10,402
|
Quote:
Is the law even retrospective (most aren't)? I would think that images legally published before the change wouldn't have become illegal, although I could be wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2822 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25,465
|
Quote:
Is the law even retrospective (most aren't)? I would think that images legally published before the change wouldn't have become illegal, although I could be wrong?
Quote:
I think that is the case as well in such instances.
Someone commented on ignorance of the law on photography. Last week I had a security man from a large security company trying to tell me that it was illegal to take a picture of a building without permission (even though it was not even on their site). I just told him he was talking rubbish and walked off. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2823 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,434
|
The rule of thumb is that if you are on a public highway you can take a picture of any building you can see. Taking pictures of people is a different matter, particularly if they object. Newspapers used to replace topless pictures in the Irish editions and in Malta customs would tear them out of the papers brought in for British holidaymakers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2824 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 17,541
|
Quote:
...and in Malta customs would tear them out of the papers brought in for British holidaymakers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2825 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25,465
|
Quote:
The rule of thumb is that if you are on a public highway you can take a picture of any building you can see. Taking pictures of people is a different matter, particularly if they object. Newspapers used to replace topless pictures in the Irish editions and in Malta customs would tear them out of the papers brought in for British holidaymakers.
Taking pictures of people is more of a grey area, it has to go beyond a simple picture before it becomes potential illegal. Some think that if they just happen to be in a scene that you photograph then you have broken the law which is not correct. There can be problems if you then use the image for commercial purposes but I think they have to be main subject of the image rather just in the scene before they can object and it will be a civil matter not criminal. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:16.



