• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
Best Boobs on TV? (Part 3)
<<
<
256 of 338
>>
>
kelvo
14-08-2016
Originally Posted by Glawster2002:
“She [Helen Skelton] does indeed!!

I follow her on Twitter and someone asked her if the "evidence" put online of the fact she likes the beach was actually of her. She replied it was she saw little point in denying it as, as far as she concerned, she had done nothing to be ashamed of and she was proud of her figure. ”

I think this story though does provide conclusive proof and removes all evidence of doubt. Where the footage came from I have no idea - guess some form of perv camera, what are the chances of all of the people, on all the beaches in the world that it should have been her.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...d-just-17.html
Bob Paisley
14-08-2016
Originally Posted by kelvo:
“I think this story though does provide conclusive proof and removes all evidence of doubt. Where the footage came from I have no idea - guess some form of perv camera, what are the chances of all of the people, on all the beaches in the world that it should have been her.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...d-just-17.html”

It's odd that this footage has been hanging around for years and only comes out now. Who's been sitting on it all this time? It's not like Helen Skelton has just become famous.
kelvo
14-08-2016
Originally Posted by Bob Paisley:
“It's odd that this footage has been hanging around for years and only comes out now. Who's been sitting on it all this time? It's not like Helen Skelton has just become famous.”

It's been out a few years and I know what mentioned in early posts on this thread along time ago, I think there was a lot of doubt over whether it was actually her or not at the time (it was one of those subjects we were not allowed to discuss )

presume at the time it was taken it was just some random girl on the beach
Bob Paisley
14-08-2016
Originally Posted by kelvo:
“It's been out a few years and I know what mentioned in early posts on this thread along time ago, I think there was a lot of doubt over whether it was actually her or not at the time (it was one of those subjects we were not allowed to discuss )

presume at the time it was taken it was just some random girl on the beach”

Doesn't the fact she was only seventeen at the time, mean it's technically child pornography or something? I know she was above the age of consent - but did I read somewhere that if you're under eighteen it's illegal to show nudity? (I may be talking nonsense, there's all sorts of stuff you read on the internet that turns out to be rubbish).
pete137
14-08-2016
Its strange that everyone has been talking about these videos for years but the press never picked up on it. Even if they werent going to show the pics (for obvious reasons) its very unlike them to "not" report on this type of thing. Helen has been famous for years. They could never have known at the time that two years later her stock would rise and she would be presenting on the olympics. Why only now?

Its obviously no coincidence that days ago everyone is talking about her short skirt and "suddenly" they are now reporting on her topless vids.
lundavra
14-08-2016
Originally Posted by kelvo:
“I think this story though does provide conclusive proof and removes all evidence of doubt. Where the footage came from I have no idea - guess some form of perv camera, what are the chances of all of the people, on all the beaches in the world that it should have been her.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...d-just-17.html”

I think it was the Mirror that made a story out of the pictures without mentioning that they had been around for years. Other tabloids then picked up. The Mail angled there version by criticising other papers for showing the pictures though did not get much sympathy in the comments!
MichPlat
14-08-2016
Originally Posted by Bob Paisley:
“I've said before her bum's her best feature (although everything about her is amazing). She was wearing shorts though. I don't like women in shorts.”

I hate women in shorts they just don't do it for me . Even Anna Kournikova couldn't pull the look off .

Only Daisy Duke managed to look good in shorts tbh
pete137
14-08-2016
Originally Posted by MichPlat:
“I hate women in shorts they just don't do it for me . Even Anna Kournikova couldn't pull the look off .

Only Daisy Duke managed to look good in shorts tbh”

Agreed, and even they were tight sexy shorts. This fashion trend for loose and flappy shorts is a total turn off. They resemble old fashioned bloomers.
Trappedin80's
14-08-2016
Jane, presenting the news in her clingy dress.

Mmmmmmm.

So voluptuous.
Bob Paisley
14-08-2016
Originally Posted by pete137:
“Agreed, and even they were tight sexy shorts. This fashion trend for loose and flappy shorts is a total turn off. They resemble old fashioned bloomers.”

Hot pants, at a push, are all right, but shorts are a turn-off on the whole.
Glawster2002
15-08-2016
Originally Posted by Bob Paisley:
“Doesn't the fact she was only seventeen at the time, mean it's technically child pornography or something? I know she was above the age of consent - but did I read somewhere that if you're under eighteen it's illegal to show nudity? (I may be talking nonsense, there's all sorts of stuff you read on the internet that turns out to be rubbish).”

I think technically is could be classed as such, although as it is in the public domain it would be unlikely anyone watching the footage in the UK would ever be charged with an offence.

Whilst I understand the need for such a law to protect children it does throw up these strange situations. for example as a naturist it is perfectly legal to go on a naturist holiday with naturist friends and their children. So we can spend two weeks fully naked but if I were to take a photo of one of their girls topless, not that I would, I could be charged with taking an indecent photograph of a child as she is under 18...
Grouty
15-08-2016
Originally Posted by Trappedin80's:
“New Ariel Winter galleries.

http://www.imagebam.com/gallery/d0j2...eveux9xbt8myh0

http://www.imagebam.com/gallery/dwfd...tyjbpwbt0onwb1”

mmmm
lundavra
15-08-2016
Originally Posted by Glawster2002:
“I think technically is could be classed as such, although as it is in the public domain it would be unlikely anyone watching the footage in the UK would ever be charged with an offence.

Whilst I understand the need for such a law to protect children it does throw up these strange situations. for example as a naturist it is perfectly legal to go on a naturist holiday with naturist friends and their children. So we can spend two weeks fully naked but if I were to take a photo of one of their girls topless, not that I would, I could be charged with taking an indecent photograph of a child as she is under 18...”

I think with the way the law is worded, even Helen Skelton would be breaking the law if she had a copy of the video.
Trappedin80's
15-08-2016
Originally Posted by Glawster2002:
“I think technically is could be classed as such, although as it is in the public domain it would be unlikely anyone watching the footage in the UK would ever be charged with an offence.

Whilst I understand the need for such a law to protect children it does throw up these strange situations. for example as a naturist it is perfectly legal to go on a naturist holiday with naturist friends and their children. So we can spend two weeks fully naked but if I were to take a photo of one of their girls topless, not that I would, I could be charged with taking an indecent photograph of a child as she is under 18...”

Some of the Page 3 models were only sixteen, so I don't think seventeen would be a legal issue.
Trappedin80's
15-08-2016
Rhian Sugden in a bikini at the beach.

http://www.imagebam.com/gallery/9jq0...ky3w8uh2jqqa50
Resonance
15-08-2016
Originally Posted by Trappedin80's:
“Some of the Page 3 models were only sixteen, so I don't think seventeen would be a legal issue.”

They changed the law to make it 18 in 2003 I think it was. Whether the law is retrospective I don't know?
Gulftastic
15-08-2016
Originally Posted by Bob Paisley:
“Hot pants, at a push, are all right, but shorts are a turn-off on the whole.”

Hot pants, you say?

Oh yes.
Bob Paisley
15-08-2016
Originally Posted by Trappedin80's:
“Rhian Sugden in a bikini at the beach.

http://www.imagebam.com/gallery/9jq0...ky3w8uh2jqqa50”

Now you're talking. Rhian Sugden has got just about the most pefect boobs I've ever seen.
Bob Paisley
15-08-2016
Originally Posted by Gulftastic:
“Hot pants, you say?

Oh yes.”

I used to love Heather Graham. Utterly beautiful, fit as anything and not averse to taking her kit off on screen when the script justified it for artistic reasons.
Straker
15-08-2016
She's wearing very well for 46:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...e-Tribeca.html
Bob Paisley
15-08-2016
Originally Posted by Straker:
“She's wearing very well for 46:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...e-Tribeca.html”

Yeah, not bad...
Maccadanny
15-08-2016
My favourite pic of Heather, come to bed eyes

http://www.imagebam.com/image/12335b499975750
pete137
15-08-2016
Natalie Imbruglia. She's still got it ! Stunning.

http://imgbox.com/wbJOxFHw

http://imgbox.com/bPlL68zL

http://imgbox.com/KZJsf9fu
Gulftastic
15-08-2016
Originally Posted by pete137:
“Natalie Imbruglia. She's still got it ! Stunning.

http://imgbox.com/wbJOxFHw

http://imgbox.com/bPlL68zL

http://imgbox.com/KZJsf9fu”

Fantastic.
Maccadanny
15-08-2016
Originally Posted by pete137:
“Natalie Imbruglia. She's still got it ! Stunning.

http://imgbox.com/wbJOxFHw

http://imgbox.com/bPlL68zL

http://imgbox.com/KZJsf9fu”

I like the floral lady garden in the second pic. I would have loved being the tattooist doing that.
<<
<
256 of 338
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map