yeah , probably the sexiest woman of the 70s , she made loads of movies but never quite made it big .

.

and doing her best to live up to her nickname

Never mind a cloth Granville, f fetch a sheet!

Emily Ratajkowski being unbelievably hot in the way only she can...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...new-range.html

She is stunning , a class above what we usually see on here

Simply phenomenal.

Charlize Theron's new boobs, via 35lb weight gain for a role.

http://www.imagebam.com/image/4c445f506649825

http://www.imagebam.com/image/4487d2506649821

http://www.imagebam.com/image/decf84506649841

http://www.imagebam.com/image/f1fdc8506649854

http://www.imagebam.com/image/623e26506649871

Lovely with a bit of meat on her bones.

Looking much better and healthier, IMO.

No doubt she will be shedding it, as fast as she possibly can, when filming wraps.

She made it big for me.

They've got the A team working on Sky Sports news at the moment!
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1...ltTmZjUWE4VVlv

Lovely jubbly

Tasty.

My god, at one point their boobs were almost touching ! I need a lie down.

there is no way they are As, C or D cups I would say

standing face-to-face they could never rub noses

C'mon Pete you must have captured that image for posterity

I say keep 'em Charlie .

No. That's more like the "D" team (actually likely the DD team).

EDIT - Ah, kevthelutonbee already covered that.

It's not often that Julia Hartley-Brewer is put in the shade, but that's what happened on The Papers tonight.

Martine was busting out of her black outfit magnificently.

Are you serious?

I imagine he is

Which women on here are significantly 'better' in your opinion?

Obviously, these things are subjective, but I think it's hard to argue that Emily Ratajkowski is anything other than a stunningly sexy girl. Perhaps she's not your type, but it hardly seems a controversial or outrageous statement.

And if we're being frank, Emily Ratajkowski is a model (and to be more specific a bikini model), and this thread includes a lot of people who are simply presenters or similar jobs. Her primary job requirement is fitness, and her secondary job requirement is presenting herself in a certain way physically, whereas other people like presenters we catch on the news or a chat show have other concerns distracting them from physical fitness and preparation.

Does that mean that many people won't prefer someone more "natural" (in other words, with a stone or two more of weight on them, a more workwomanlike application of makeup worn, etc.)? Of course not. But it's fair to say that Emily Ratajkowski is both extremely genetically blessed, but also very good at her job (of looking great whenever anyone is around with a camera).