I don't know if anyone else has mentioned it, but a guy in the pub told me that dog on the tightrope that won WAS A DIFFERENT BLOODY DOG!
Some people!
Some people!
Pub rumour
Originally Posted by Magic8Ball:
“I don't know if anyone else has mentioned it, but a guy in the pub told me that dog on the tightrope that won WAS A DIFFERENT BLOODY DOG!
Some people!”
“I don't know if anyone else has mentioned it, but a guy in the pub told me that dog on the tightrope that won WAS A DIFFERENT BLOODY DOG!
Some people!”
Methinks you are extracting the proverbial.
Originally Posted by Magic8Ball:
“I don't know if anyone else has mentioned it, but a guy in the pub told me that dog on the tightrope that won WAS A DIFFERENT BLOODY DOG!
Some people!”
“I don't know if anyone else has mentioned it, but a guy in the pub told me that dog on the tightrope that won WAS A DIFFERENT BLOODY DOG!
Some people!”
Since it was in a pub, presumably all of you drunks stumbled out into the street in a drunken rage determined to FIND THAT DOG AND PUNISH IT!!!
Originally Posted by Magic8Ball:
“I don't know if anyone else has mentioned it, but a guy in the pub told me that dog on the tightrope that won WAS A DIFFERENT BLOODY DOG!
Some people!”
“I don't know if anyone else has mentioned it, but a guy in the pub told me that dog on the tightrope that won WAS A DIFFERENT BLOODY DOG!
Some people!”
Really? Why has no one mentioned this on here?
It must be the same dogs as she deliberately put it in one side, it went up and across and then down the other side. Also if there was an extra dog, it would have been brought on at the end to make the act above board, clear and fair.
Surely no one would mislead the voting public like that would they?
