Originally Posted by Eddie hunter:
“I don't think that's a fair point really. Its about how the money was spent as a whole and in many instances it was badly spent by Liverpool. If you cant get a £50m player it doesn't mean you buy two £25m players that you don't need or want.
Its not really a massive dig at Liverpool I was just originally pointing out that bad transfer dealings seriously hampered winning the title for the club, all clubs do it to a certain extent but it seemed to happen at Liverpool more than most.”
“I don't think that's a fair point really. Its about how the money was spent as a whole and in many instances it was badly spent by Liverpool. If you cant get a £50m player it doesn't mean you buy two £25m players that you don't need or want.
Its not really a massive dig at Liverpool I was just originally pointing out that bad transfer dealings seriously hampered winning the title for the club, all clubs do it to a certain extent but it seemed to happen at Liverpool more than most.”
Originally Posted by alancracker:
“I do not really disagree with you Eddie - I have no problem saying 'absolutely' after the BIB. I also think we made too many signings at times - players brought in were not doing it and so were ditched and several more brought in, only for them to be ditched themselves before too long. More patience was needed and maybe a policy adopted of 3 or 4 per window not 7 or 8”
“I do not really disagree with you Eddie - I have no problem saying 'absolutely' after the BIB. I also think we made too many signings at times - players brought in were not doing it and so were ditched and several more brought in, only for them to be ditched themselves before too long. More patience was needed and maybe a policy adopted of 3 or 4 per window not 7 or 8”
Kind of becoming an LFC/MUFC love in this, full credit to you Alan for agreeing.
Think you are wasted here, you should get over to the middle east to sort things out over there...
