Originally Posted by GrouchoM:
“Sky? That is not my experience - I'm talking about customer service which is non-existent with BT. Sky sports offer so much more than BT & yes, I pay for that. But BT seem to think that liking sport = liking football - in my case this is so not true! & paying thru the nose for BT broadband counts for very little it seems...........”
Sky Sports may offer more channels (7) but they also charge a lot more, Sky Sports costs a minimum of £45.50, you may say great value, I wouldn't,
BT Sport will have 4 channels for £5 if you have BT broadband but not BTTV , or free if you have BTTV , I don't agree that people who bought BT Broadband on the understanding that 3 channels were included should now have to pay for 2 of them ( even if they get a 4th channel at the same time), but I don't think my ordinary Sky TV pack should go up £2 to subsidise Sky Sports customer like you, if Sky pay 4billion pounds for EPL, they should may people like you pay for it, not expect people like me to contribute to keep your costs down
You say BT think liking sport equals liking football, but Sky are equally guilty, given what they paid for EPL and don't forget they did want Champions league, but they blew their money on EPL and were outbid for it.
Have you looked actually looked at what BT actually show ?, there is a lot more that just football on their channels, may be less than Sky but then it is a third of the price
if Sky didn't have English premier league do you think anybody at all would be prepared to pay £45.50 (minimum) to watch their sport channels , for what , F1 ( snooze fest) and cricket and golf ?,
You like Sky Sports, fine, I'm a Sky TV customer to, but I'm not evangelical about them, they are a business , and they are after your money, same as BT,
BT say buy broadband get sports free, Sky say buy sports get broadband free, they both are stretching the truth as it isn't 'free' at all,