|
||||||||
Which idiot made "Thomas The Tank Engine" CGI ? ! ? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North East, England
Posts: 1,948
|
The non-CGI has so much charm and if I ever re-watch it's only them I go to.
Saying that maybe in 15 years kids today will look at the CGI version and say the same! What 'spoilt' it for me was giving the characters individual voices and changing the theme tune was a big no-no
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 628
|
My daughter is 9 now, but she absolutely loved Thomas when she was younger, both the original and the CGI version.
At first I didn't like the CGI version, but it grows on you, and the theme tune is much catchier than the old one (singing along Their 2, their 4, their 6, their 8, shunting trucks and hauling freight.... in my head) The one I really hate the CGI version of is Bob the Builder, and daughter hated it too. Not seen a CGI version of Inspector Gadget, but saw higher up this thread that they have changed the theme tune. That is so wrong! |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 369
|
What amuses me slightly is that 'Thomas and Friends' has been using CGI since 2008, and been fully CGI from 2010. There's also been half a dozen fully CGI movies (which kids love).
So this is hardly a sudden thing to get outraged about! |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,106
|
Similarly the CGI version of Bananas in Pyjamas was very disappointing, the whole charm of the original series was the costumes.
Converting live action/stop motion series to CGI too often simply turns them into just another generic animation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,371
|
Quote:
My daughter is 9 now, but she absolutely loved Thomas when she was younger, both the original and the CGI version.
At first I didn't like the CGI version, but it grows on you, and the theme tune is much catchier than the old one (singing along Their 2, their 4, their 6, their 8, shunting trucks and hauling freight.... in my head) The one I really hate the CGI version of is Bob the Builder, and daughter hated it too. Not seen a CGI version of Inspector Gadget, but saw higher up this thread that they have changed the theme tune. That is so wrong! |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,215
|
I loved the original Thomas the Tank Engine as a kid. I guess it was unusual for a girl at the time (early 90s) but I was never much into traditional 'girly' stuff. I had (and still have) loads of Thomas the Tank Engine models. I also played a lot with toy cars and planes
I saw some of the new Thomas episodes a while back when channel surfing and it's just not the same. It lost the 'charm' it once had. Even the toys seem a bit dumbed down these days.
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 628
|
Quote:
And now we have to have female trains?
I do think it is right to have positive male and female characters in kids TV programs, but sometimes it makes the stereotyping worse than if there had been none. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 669
|
Quote:
And now we have to have female trains?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 866
|
For the DVDs, you'll be safe buying/ watching any series 1-10, It was either series 11 or 12 that went animated.
I've watched more than my fair share of Thomas with my nephew, and must say he is more captured by the animated series. He was very quick at learning facial expressions and what different faces meant |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,846
|
My sons adored the early ones and would keep re-winding and watching. With the close ups of the faces and the straightforward storylines, the original Thomas the Tank Engine stories were also regarded as perfect to use alongside other techniques to help young children with autism learn to read faces and expressions. "Percy's sad!" "James is cross!" etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 2,215
|
Quote:
Lets forget that childrens programmes are made by adults - probably with little input from the target audience. The budget for kids TV has also been cut so you have a situation where adults with not much money to play with have been 'ordered' to make something new. Gone are the days where legendary kids TV was made - what we have now is filler at best. Children no longer avidly follow a certain series and prefer other activities like using the computer.
But why are they rehashing old TV anyway? Do todays kids even know what a steam train is? Or Thunderbirds? On the steam trains thing, all the kids I`ve ever met love steam trains, visiting a steam heritage railway with ones kids is a standard trip out that they love. In fact you show me a child (boy or girl) who doesn`t like steam trains and I`ll show you a child I`d be a bit worried about...... |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 2,215
|
Quote:
Yeah just stick to complete series 1 - 7. [to get the kosher Thomas with eth models]
I aint letting my kids anywhere near shitty new dangermouse, thundercats or thunderbirds. If I desire to want them watching these shows im putting on the dvds for the original. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 2,215
|
Quote:
My son would never watch the 'old' episodes once the CGI ones started - it's been CGI for a few years know and he much prefers them.
And surely he's the type of viewer that actually matters? |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 240
|
As long as the script is top notch who cares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 2,215
|
Basically, as you can possibly tell, I dislike CGI full stop. I like real life, the models were real !
I can remember watching a programme by Brian Cox and it kept showing images of Mars or wherever, but not putting on the screen whether they were actual pictures (from satellites or landers), so I just assumed they weren`t real, and lost interest, and turned it off. I actually tried to contact Mr Cox to suggest he noted when pictures were real but sadly couldn`t find a way to do that. I also think big budget epics have been ruined by CGI. When you see a big battle scene it`s nowhere near as impressive when you don`t actually now if there are thousand of real people in it or it`s just animated ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 2,215
|
Quote:
Does anyone know why they`ve started making "Thomas The Tank Engine" in CGI ?
Which cretin is responsible for that appalling decision and which wall will he (or she) be shot against ? One of the best things about Thomas was the fabulous models, in fact, in a way, it was "real", it was the models coming to life. I used to love it and when we had our little terror I thought well that`s one programme I won`t mind watching with him ! But it`s now crappy CGI, I HATE IT !..... I`ve even surprised myself about how upset I am about it ! Did they make Thomas The Tank Engine computer generated because it`s cheaper to make than all the models ? Or is it because they think it`s more trendy, more "up to date" ? Is there anyone in the world who actually prefers a CGI Thomas The Tank Engine to the old models ? Lastly, if we buy our lad any Thomas programmes on DVD, does anyone know how can we ensure it`s the kosher version, not the crappy CGI one ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 574
|
Quote:
As long as the script is top notch who cares.
As far as the animation goes, you have to move with the times. Utilising CGI allows for a much more diverse range of facial expressions, and can make the engines look more realistic than they every did as toys. As you rightly say, it's the stories that are important.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South East
Posts: 4,638
|
Quote:
And now we have to have female trains?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 2,215
|
Quote:
As far as the animation goes, you have to move with the times. Utilising CGI allows for a much more diverse range of facial expressions, and can make the engines look more realistic than they every did as toys. As you rightly say, it's the stories that are important.
![]() On the looking more realistic thing, I liked the fact it`s toy trains coming to life, and on that basis the model version was far more realistic. I don`t want the Thomas characters to look "realistic", I wanted them to look like the toy trains I had. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 558
|
Quote:
would be interesting to sit a group of adults and kids down, let them watch say 5 episodes of the pre CGI stuff, 5 episodes of the CGI stuff, then get them to vote on which they preferred look wise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,656
|
Quote:
I loved the original Thomas the Tank Engine as a kid. I guess it was unusual for a girl at the time (early 90s) but I was never much into traditional 'girly' stuff. I had (and still have) loads of Thomas the Tank Engine models. I also played a lot with toy cars and planes
I saw some of the new Thomas episodes a while back when channel surfing and it's just not the same. It lost the 'charm' it once had. Even the toys seem a bit dumbed down these days. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 9,746
|
If they ever re-do Trumpton or Camberwick Green or Bagpuss in CGI there will be deaths!
![]() Just NO! Why not teach children to gain an attention span rather than, as usual doing nothing and taking the easy way out, pandering to it and saying "oh they don't have one and get bored if it's under 400mph" ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 672
|
Quote:
If they ever re-do Trumpton or Camberwick Green or Bagpuss in CGI there will be deaths!
![]() Just NO! Why not teach children to gain an attention span rather than, as usual doing nothing and taking the easy way out, pandering to it and saying "oh they don't have one and get bored if it's under 400mph" ? What are you rambling about? |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 4,431
|
Thomas the Tank Engine is a much loved character. He shouldn't be in CGI
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 2,215
|
Quote:
The non-CGI has so much charm and if I ever re-watch it's only them I go to.
Saying that maybe in 15 years kids today will look at the CGI version and say the same! What 'spoilt' it for me was giving the characters individual voices and changing the theme tune was a big no-no ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:51.




I saw some of the new Thomas episodes a while back when channel surfing and it's just not the same. It lost the 'charm' it once had. Even the toys seem a bit dumbed down these days.
