|
||||||||
Doctor Who - 9TH April |
| View Poll Results: What did you think to the episode? | |||
| Very poor |
|
16 | 2.86% |
| Poor |
|
11 | 1.96% |
| Fair |
|
33 | 5.89% |
| Good |
|
76 | 13.57% |
| Very good |
|
166 | 29.64% |
| Excellent |
|
258 | 46.07% |
| Voters: 560. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#276 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 424
|
Just saw the Sunday repeat. That was the best Dr Who story I've seen for awhile. Exciting, scary and very, very funny. Rose keeps getting better; her relationship with the Dr reminds me of the Dr and Ace (minus the suggestion of sexual attraction). There's a sense of genuine friendship. Mark Gattis can continue to write the lot as far as I'm concerned! 2 very enthusisatic thumbs up!
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#277 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,741
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by yohinnchild
altohugh people are saying he didn't regenerate in the first episode (Rose) he looks in a mirror before he gets attacked by the arm and says "not bad apart from the ears" this meant to me regeneration its just we didn't see it so we could become fully attached to the new Doctor straight away
I said he might not have regenerated from Paul McGann's Doctor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#278 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 128
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ONscotland
On the subject of the mysterious actions of CE, I'm sure he lied to Rose. He said that Gwen was dead as soon as she walked under the arch, this was clearly not the case.
Remember at the start of the story, when the bodies are possessed they still do the thing that they wanted to do - perhaps she wanted to strike the match ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#279 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 54
|
So far, so good for the new Doctor Who. The 3rd episode in the new series was not the best but it was watchable and the acting rates highly. For once the BBC hasn't wasted a pile of licence payers cash on a load of worthless crap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrightmate
This is true.
It could be a risk. ..... (all I was commiting on is the "doctor isn't the doctor" specualtion). I have to say I agree with the rest of your post, especially about "not playing it safe", let the writers write. So if RTD wants the "doctor isn't the doctor" (or any of the other speculation) let him do it. |
|
|
|
#281 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dalston
Posts: 4,673
|
Are the ratings in yet of ep 3?
|
|
|
|
|
#282 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kingston Upon Thames
Posts: 1,516
|
As mentioned earlier in this very same thread 8.3m. And before you ask, Ant and Dec got 7.1m.
|
|
|
|
|
#283 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,887
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by *Duncan*
[b]
Her exact words are: "The things you've seen: the darkness; the big bad wolf." ![]() There are other Bad Wolf references in fairy stories and nursery rythmes (Little Red Riding Hood, Wolf in sheeps clothing, Virginina and the Wolf) but only one Big Bad Wolf and he's not really associated with disguise (as previous posters have speculated). As for who or what the Big Bad Wolf is and how it destroyed Gallifrey, well thats another matter entirely. ![]() Oh and I really can't see the Doctor being the Master in disguise. That would be like waking up and finding Bobby Ewing in the shower It's cheating the audience, it won't happen
|
|
|
|
|
|
#284 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Here in spirit!
Posts: 9,605
|
A couple of points:
1) This is Doctor Who for a new generation, a percentage of whom will not even know we've had eight previous incarnations, or indeed how that could even come about. For a lot of new viewers, this will be their first Doctor - and regardless of how many people play the role subsequently, possibly even their favourite (the original, you might say). 2). 'Wasting' a regeneration by having CE replaced by someone else so soon after already regenerating is really a non-starter. The writers can always extend his regenerations by some means or other. (Maybe the Time Lords restart the clock for him as a reward after he saves Gallifrey at the end of the series - who knows?). And new viewers don't even know there's a limit to the number of times this can happen. At least, not yet. Will they ever? For all we know, in this "reboot" of the original series, this Doctor could be number one, the first incarnation. 3). Both RTD and Mark Gatis have contributed to the 'continuing adventures' (i.e. novels etc) writing several books between them. They're great fans themselves. So of course they're going to use elements from the books, and not necessarily their own writings. I'd take that as a given. Last edited by DenWatts : 10-04-2005 at 22:31. |
|
|
|
|
|
#285 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Here in spirit!
Posts: 9,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rooks
Oh and I really can't see the Doctor being the Master in disguise. That would be like waking up and finding Bobby Ewing in the shower
It's cheating the audience, it won't happen ![]() The credits says he's the Doctor, so he's the Doctor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#286 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dundee
Posts: 7,475
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenWatts
Absolutely!
The credits says he's the Doctor, so he's the Doctor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#287 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Here in spirit!
Posts: 9,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rooks
I have a theory on this. In the nursery rythme the Big Bad Wolf blew down the pigs houses. In Doctor Who terms could the Big Bad Wolf be the destroyer of Gallifrey? Could it have blown their house down?
![]() I think people are being royally led up the garden path, "first on the left, second on the right, down past the bins" etc. etc. by this. A similar device was used in the continuing adventures to allude to the Doctor being an imposter, kept you guessing right until the end. It's been dropped in as a nod to the continuing adventures, but does not mean the Doctor is not the Doctor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#288 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Here in spirit!
Posts: 9,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stuart62
Actually, the credits say he's "Doctor Who".
![]() But I was illustrating a point, and didn't want to get into yet another "Who is Doctor Who" discussion, which is why I deliberately phrased it the way I did. |
|
|
|
|
|
#289 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dundee
Posts: 7,475
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenWatts
They always did, as far as I remember!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#290 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,035
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rooks
I have a theory on this. In the nursery rythme the Big Bad Wolf blew down the pigs houses. In Doctor Who terms could the Big Bad Wolf be the destroyer of Gallifrey? Could it have blown their house down?
![]() Whatever 'it' is, it is something Gwyneth claims Rose has already encountered. |
|
|
|
|
|
#291 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Here in spirit!
Posts: 9,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stuart62
Only until JNT came along AFAIR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#292 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Here in spirit!
Posts: 9,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by *Duncan*
But if so, how can Rose have seen the Big Bad Wolf as Gwyneth claimed when using her 'sight'?
Whatever 'it' is, it is something Gwyneth claims Rose has already encountered. |
|
|
|
|
|
#293 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dundee
Posts: 7,475
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenWatts
See my revised post as to why I phrased it the way I did - you get in there fast!
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#294 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Here in spirit!
Posts: 9,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stuart62
There's a joke there somewhere but I wouldn't stoop so low!
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#295 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 467
|
Maybe the ‘bad wolf’ is a metaphor for death?
Rose has encountered death in her past and whilst she has been with the Doctor. The doctor was referred to as meaning ‘death’ in episode 1. If he is responsible for blowing up his planet then he truly is the ‘bringer of death’ on a cosmic scale. |
|
|
|
|
|
#296 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Here in spirit!
Posts: 9,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temp3st
Maybe the ‘bad wolf’ is a metaphor for death?
Rose has encountered death in her past and whilst she has been with the Doctor. The doctor was referred to as meaning ‘death’ in episode 1. If he is responsible for blowing up his planet then he truly is the ‘bringer of death’ on a cosmic scale. Death is the Doctor's companion - it's down to Rose to set him free. Again, borrowing from the books. |
|
|
|
|
|
#297 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,037
|
In all this hoo har about the bad wolf, I think we've forgotten something far more worrying - Rose's idiot of a boyfriend is going to be in next weeks episode!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#298 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 371
|
It's a pity that Clive from episode one got killed off, I'd have liked to have seen more of him, he could have been the Doctor Who equivalent of the three lone gunmen (i think) characters from the X Files. Could have made for some quite good comic relief throughouth the series, and could also have helped a bit with revealing bits of the story arc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#299 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 36
|
don't suppose the 'big bad wolf' could be that 'doctor who hunter chappie' from the first episode (sorry forgot his name) - after all the actor was used effectively as a baddie in a previous RTD production (the second coming?) and the reference to rose having seen the 'big bad wolf' must surely mean we witnessed it (albeit unknowingly at this point) - perhaps he wasnt shot after all?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#300 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Here in spirit!
Posts: 9,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessikart
In all this hoo har about the bad wolf, I think we've forgotten something far more worrying - Rose's idiot of a boyfriend is going to be in next weeks episode!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:00.





