|
||||||||
Ofcom are going to look into BGT scam, after 1,150 complaints |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#201 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,636
|
Hence Ofcom's ruling of no PRIOR intent to mislead.
Basically, if people didn't watch the semi final then its their fault for assuming the act only involved Matisse. |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#202 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: St. Albans, UK, Team Wagner
Posts: 42,866
|
Fair enough
I can perhaps see why people felt 'misled' if they didnt know about the orher dog (and only saw the final) but thats not Jules' fault really (I doubt she named her act either), it would have been more misleading if Chase had been used but the name collars swapped or something.That didnt happen though.
|
|
|
|
|
#203 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 14,231
|
Quote:
Hence Ofcom's ruling of no PRIOR intent to mislead.
Basically, if people didn't watch the semi final then its their fault for assuming the act only involved Matisse. |
|
|
|
|
#204 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5,853
|
I would hope with all the complaints it would get looked at
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:34.


I can perhaps see why people felt 'misled' if they didnt know about the orher dog (and only saw the final) but thats not Jules' fault really (I doubt she named her act either), it would have been more misleading if Chase had been used but the name collars swapped or something.