Interesting thing is in that video ,
Helen is laughing about it and telling him he must do it again in the house .

Quote
" OMG , Pleease do that "

No it was because Helen was in the house making her miserable. Although they eventually got along, she only started getting her kit off again after Helen left, from what we've seen


The video is not really how Helen describes it, is it? Yes he did it - something from BB US winner that was thought hilarious - apparently not so in the bunker. It sounds like they gave Brian a hard time for much of the rest of the day then by the later discussion all is forgiven (the beginning of the vid), they're having a laugh about it, Marc's trying to persuade him to do it in the main house, Helen seems to agree, and everyone is laughing including Helen.

Hang him!!!


It's a complete character assassination based on stuff we've already seen and minor events that Helen takes to huge extremes (anyone remember the eye roll from Jale last year?).

Standard stuff from her.

She takes great offense at Brian supposedly using her escort work against her 'you make money from being a professional scumbag.' Um, notice the present tense Helen - you're paid to spit venom in the Star and more recently in BB again.

He is vile & disgusting, not a nice person at all.

The first paragraph is spot on. Helen needs to be really careful. It's all about her justifying those comments and she is digging a bigger hole for herself.

The thing is that Brian is litigious. And if he'll take on the TOWIE producers no doubt he'd be able to take on Helen Wood. I don't think he'd have to prove or disprove her feelings just whether his actions where consistent with her article and whether they could have reasonably be seen as aggressive or even deviant.

If he disagrees with Helen as to the content of her article in terms of alleged actions then he could very easily sue her. But if her content is accurate and the evidence supports it then her perception of it is all there is to discuss.

In my mind there are some dodgy accusations in there and wilful distortions of Brian's intentions. I think the frozen duck was an attempt at laddish banter not a 'rapey' action as proposed by Helen. Everything else was more about perceptions than nefarious activity. Sex stories and the such is kind of par for course but the staring and heavy breathing can easily be disproved in a court of law and would amount to slander. If he doesn't go for that then I could only surmise that it is provable.

Apparently there are clips of this online on the BB page.

Why would she make it up when there are cameras everywhere?

Disgusting creep needs to be outed, the public who haven't already wised up need to wise up to his 5 year old brain in an adult body being a big scam.

No horse in this race, really dislike both, but this really reads to me as Helen, rather than just putting her hands up and apologising for the rapist/murderer remark, is instead trying to justify and manufacture (and twist) context for why she said it in order to make herself looks slightly less awful than she is.

She seems terminally incapable of taking responsibility for anything - it's always someone else's fault.

I think this may be a bit of exaggeration on Helens part.
We don't know what went on really but for someone who claims she was so intimidated by Brians behaviour she did seem to go out of her way to goad him.

I know in the past if ever I have felt intimidated and unsafe I have avoided that person like the plague. I have not goaded and baited them to be even more agressive and weird towards me.
I don't doubt Brians behaviour was a bit weird at times but I also don't believe things were as bad as what Helen is making it out to be.

I just don't buy it!!!

I take it you believe Helens interpretation.. And are happy to judge on that basis.

You can tell by my body language? What a very odd thing to say about yourself, almost like you were trying to divert or cover your tracks in some way.

Yes, true, he is litigious. It would seem above clip shows that Helen was far from intimidated by Brian and she and Marc were hoping he'd do this very scary frozen duck in the main house.

Marc did it for a laugh....he has done it before.....what Brian did was creepy.

Yes, I'd agree with all of that.

Yes.....why do we only have to believe Brian.

Brian is a weirdo man child mentalist.

I love how people will constantly make excuses for the guy. A grown man of his age trying to imitate a frozen chicken by spreading his ass cheeks and curling up in a foetal position isn't funny, isn't hilarious, and it isn't normal.. especially in front of people you've barely just met.

It's weird, sad, creepy, and attention seeking and I can't imagine many more offensive sights than if that fat tongued oddball doing it.

100% Belo is a fraud and always has been, don't belive anything about his persona which comes from himself.

He is freaky.

Good article. Brian was a freak and a trouble causer who wanted to appear as the Hero for going against the "baddies" at any given chance

So it's the truth according to Helen's opinion again.
That Frozen Chicken thing has been done for years and they all laughed and agreed he should do it in the house.

The sad thing is they all seemed to be getting along and discussing fun stuff that might shake the rest of them up.
Where did it all go wrong?

Just interested to know why you think Belo is 100% a fraud? When probably the majority think he is a reasonably decent sort of chap, perhaps a bit sensitive at times.

What have you seen that most haven't?

This is a very nasty piece - from the headline to the content. I don't know whether the author took artistic lisence or whether the words fell from Helen's lips in this way. Either way, why should someone be portrayed a sex predator.

Helen produced one article whilst in the house and another when she's outside the house. Ive said it before: she has an avenue to talk as much as she wants in a national paper... Other people don't.

Reading through the article again you're probably right. Most of what she says are things that probably happened however her wilful misinterpretation cannot be put on trial. The frozen duck thing is made out to be a sexually terroristic action when in fact it was a badly measured joke. Heavy breathing could mean anything and from Pav last year staring could mean anything also. The rest is just a negative interpretation of probable events as she remembers them and you can hardly sue over them. She is very good at this isn't she?

I take it all the people who are taking Helen's side on this thread have watched the link to the incident? She is laughing!!

Very well put!


When Brian stood up to Helen I guess.