• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Danny - fooling YOU into giving him the WIN
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
Friendly Uncle
28-06-2015
To put it simply, Danny is not the person he's thinly veiling himself to be.

Everything he does is calculated, who to kick off at, when to kick off at them, its all done with a view to how he will be perceived- the classic hero act.

From his pov he is effectively the only one of the early top 3 still standing and has gotten nothing but cheers from the public. He's is counting that 150k and that z-list lifestyle he has been chasing all these years.

It's so close he can smell it. He cannot stand the mere mention of winning as it is his obsession, he was projecting his own discomfort with that question onto Nick.

That is what he felt remorse for last night after his highly aggressive behaviour. He isn't the most intelligent HM we've ever been blessed with so he freely admits this to Nick in the bedroom;

"All it's come across is that im a ****ing angry person, but im not"

He is only disappointed in himself cos he has lost it yet again without much of anything in the way of provocation, and it will be perceived badly.

I urge you do not be fooled by this fraud. Do not give him the win he so desperately craves. He simply does not deserve it, when he isn't engaging in this aggressive behaviour he is one of the most boring HMs of all time.

I do not care who is crowned winner as long as this aggressive half-witted dullard does not trick the whole great nation of Great Britain into crowing him it's winner.

If Danny is your winner I urge you to please reconsider. Thank you.
Janette800
28-06-2015
Not keen on anyone in the house but Danny is the better option
RabidWolverine1
28-06-2015
Am I missing something?

Is there anything wrong with wanting to win and be £150,000 richer?

Would anybody actually just want to be in a show like this just for the experience?

I don't see anything wrong with playing to win
Eve Elle
28-06-2015
Joel, Nick or even Mark would be more worthy winners than Danny Douchebag.
Esther_Aspley
28-06-2015
Danny how there you pull the wool over my eyes, and make me vote for you to win
roseblue1
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Janette800:
“Not keen on anyone in the house but Danny is the better option”

Mr Bland.
Friendly Uncle
28-06-2015
no Wolverine there is nothing wrong with it at all.

But lets not forget they all said (that we saw) they would stay for the experience rather than walk with the cash, apart from Jack who would be down to Ladbrookes faster than Danny would throw a ham sandwich at a pizza box.

My point isn't that it's wrong to want to win- I think generally we all find it refreshing when someone says they do- but rather that Danny doesnt deserve to.

He never ever mentions it- yet I think he is thinking about it constantly.

If you like Danny and want to crown him your winner, that's fair enough. This is just my opinion and I am interested to hear yours
Janette800
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Eve Elle:
“Joel, Nick or even Mark would be more worthy winners than Danny Douchebag. ”

Joel who's done nothing and thinks he's a politician....Nick who spends all day in bed with a naked exhibitionist.....i'm not a fan of Danny but he has entertained us
jp761
28-06-2015
Nah only the editing of the show can fool me!
At times the missing parts need to be guessed!
Bacon&Eggs
28-06-2015
It doesn't make much sense to "kick off" if you're trying to win a popularity contest.
coke_pepper
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by RabidWolverine1:
“Am I missing something?

Is there anything wrong with wanting to win and be £150,000 richer?

Would anybody actually just want to be in a show like this just for the experience?

I don't see anything wrong with playing to win ”

There isn't. But to get Danny to admit it you'd have to subject him to some pretty extreme torture. Which in my eyes puts him at 10 in a scale of 1 to 10 in insincerity.
It's the oldest trick in the book for BB housemates and no longer cuts the mustard.
It also shows a level of disdain towards the viewing public. As if he's clever enough to pull the wool over our eyes.
KesGreen
28-06-2015
I'd only vote if it was for no one to win and for the money to go to someone or some cause that actually deserves it.
Pretzel
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by RabidWolverine1:
“Am I missing something?

Is there anything wrong with wanting to win and be £150,000 richer?

Would anybody actually just want to be in a show like this just for the experience?

I don't see anything wrong with playing to win ”

No, you're right, it's a good thing to want to win. In UK BB it seems to have developed to be a a no no to say that you actually want to win, it's not done. In the US it would be expected but somehow it's Britsh to play modest. Of course they'd all love to win it, and love the money too, but they understandably don't say that.

Dannys is an OK guy, he;s not my winner or best housemate but he wouldn't be a dreadful winner either. I think if he won it would be somewhat by default, but hey 150 grand by default is still 150 grand,,
Eve Elle
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Bacon&Eggs:
“It doesn't make much sense to "kick off" if you're trying to win a popularity contest.”

It does if you believe you're playing the "hero".
ArtistBaptista
28-06-2015
I don't think it's a coincidence that the two favourites have been on reality TV before. I'd rather someone flawed but normal to win like Nick or Chloe.
Friendly Uncle
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Bacon&Eggs:
“It doesn't make much sense to "kick off" if you're trying to win a popularity contest.”

it really does if you're kicking off at the 'right' people

Come on folks am I the only one? Is it a lost cause?

The guy said himself a couple weeks ago he was going to start acting. Did this not set any alarms bells off for anybody? Not that he's acting per se- but rather that he is thinking this way all the time...

how he is being perceived, how can he improve his perception.
jp761
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Janette800:
“Joel who's done nothing and thinks he's a politician....Nick who spends all day in bed with a naked exhibitionist.....i'm not a fan of Danny but he has entertained us”

I agree. For one reason or another , Danny is featured quite a lot on almost every show. A few of the housemates are barely featuring recently. He's the better option quite a bad bunch imo.
Bacon&Eggs
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Eve Elle:
“It does if you believe you're playing the "hero". ”

Risky game though... i mean going against the unpopular guy may get you some hero worship but kicking off so violently...

Too risky imo.

Originally Posted by Friendly Uncle:
“it really does if you're kicking off at the 'right' people

Come on folks am I the only one? Is it a lost cause?

The guy said himself a couple weeks ago he was going to start acting. Did this not set any alarms bells off for anybody? Not that he's acting per se- but rather that he is thinking this way all the time...

how he is being perceived, how can he improve his perception.”

He kicked off at Marc on the first night though, you can't put his anger issues down to a recent event.
Friendly Uncle
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Bacon&Eggs:
“
He kicked off at Marc on the first night though, you can't put his anger issues down to a recent event.”

agreed his outbursts are not premeditated and are imo therefore the most genuine behaviour we see from Danny

thats why he was expressing remorse to Nick as how it will come across that he is "a ****ing angry guy... which im not"...

Well Danny boy there's some former pizza boxes and ham sandwiches that would disagree.
flower 2
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Friendly Uncle:
“no Wolverine there is nothing wrong with it at all.

But lets not forget they all said (that we saw) they would stay for the experience rather than walk with the cash, apart from Jack who would be down to Ladbrookes faster than Danny would throw a ham sandwich at a pizza box.

My point isn't that it's wrong to want to win- I think generally we all find it refreshing when someone says they do- but rather that Danny doesnt deserve to.

He never ever mentions it- yet I think he is thinking about it constantly.

If you like Danny and want to crown him your winner, that's fair enough. This is just my opinion and I am interested to hear yours”

My opinion of Danny is much the same as yours FU ( and that is the initials of your name, not anything else )
Friendly Uncle
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by flower 2:
“My opinion of Danny is much the same as yours FU ( and that is the initials of your name, not anything else )”



That's good to know, I always seem to be in a minority in my opinion of HMs but to me Danny behaves like a silly teen lad who thinks he's acting how a man should.

The sort of stuff that he'll look back on and cringe at but then you remember he's almost 30 and should have a bit more about him to be kind.

It just would grate on me somewhat if someone as transparent as Danny managed to pull this much wool over so many people's eyes.

Not to call anybody out if they're a Danny fan, but I would like to hear why Danny should win in your opinion. As all i see is a killer cocktail of a boring aggressive dullard.
Syntax Error
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by RabidWolverine1:
“Am I missing something?

Is there anything wrong with wanting to win and be £150,000 richer?

Would anybody actually just want to be in a show like this just for the experience?

I don't see anything wrong with playing to win ”

Spot on.

I've always thought that's what BB is supposed to be about.
Friendly Uncle
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Syntax Error:
“Spot on.

I've always thought that's what BB is supposed to be about.”

give the thread a bit of a read, no where did anyone ever say contrary
Syntax Error
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Friendly Uncle:
“give the thread a bit of a read, no where did anyone ever say contrary”

I know; I can read.

I was simply agreeing with the other poster whom I thought was bang on the money.
kali
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Friendly Uncle:
“it really does if you're kicking off at the 'right' people

Come on folks am I the only one? Is it a lost cause?

The guy said himself a couple weeks ago he was going to start acting. Did this not set any alarms bells off for anybody? Not that he's acting per se- but rather that he is thinking this way all the time...

how he is being perceived, how can he improve his perception.”

Agree with this however Danny's "kicking off" has backfired on him. He has tried to intimidate Marc several time yet he is the one who has shown himself up as a bad tempered, violent fool, who, when challenged, can only screech "shut up" or throw things at people like a spoiled child with no self-control.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map