• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Any idea what the "legends" fee would have been?
Citizen Kane
28-06-2015
If the press is to believed we have some idea what fees are offered to attract celebrities.
Anyone have an idea what Helen, Nikki, Brian and Ash would have been given?

Rosebud
Littlegreen42
28-06-2015
I'd say 50-100k?
Milhause
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Littlegreen42:
“I'd say 50-100k?”

In total maybe but certainly not each!
Littlegreen42
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Milhause:
“In total maybe but certainly not each! ”

I thought I was pushing it a bit.
Barracute
28-06-2015
Whatever they were paid Nikki was the only one that was worth it !
hellomoto977
28-06-2015
I read somewhere (could be completely wrong) that they were given 15k each per week...so maybe it was doubled if they agreed to stay the extra period of time?
od hominem
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Littlegreen42:
“I'd say 50-100k?”

Not a chance.
Annsyre
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Citizen Kane:
“If the press is to believed we have some idea what fees are offered to attract celebrities.
Anyone have an idea what Helen, Nikki, Brian and Ash would have been given?

Rosebud ”

All that their agents could screw out of the show. Nikki's doing a PA in Brighton and she will get paid for that too. And they get paid for appearing on BOTS too.
Callous
28-06-2015
It's very hard to judge what the fee would be..and if they'd all be paid the same.

I vaguely remember one housemate on twitter (maybe Nick Bateman...not sure) mentioned that one of the housemates pulled out of Ultimate Big Brother after they were mistakenly sent another housemates contract (which was for far more money).


15k a week is possible I suppose. I mean the prize fund is 150k for 10 weeks (maybe less this year)...so I suppose producers might have thought 15k per week would be fair for the Legends.

Personally I doubt all 3 would have got that much...but who knows.
Chief_Wiggum
28-06-2015
I imagine each will have received different amounts depending on their status and how much the producers wanted them in the house.
Seymour
28-06-2015
I can't believe people would pay money to see any of the three legends, imo they should pay BB for giving them screen time, I think this years HM's have had a raw deal having to share their time with gobshites like them.....
TrustFundBaby
28-06-2015
They would not of been expensive. They are nobodies. This is their only chance to get on tv and become relevant. They would probably of done it for free.
go57uk
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by Seymour:
“I can't believe people would pay money to see any of the three legends, imo they should pay BB for giving them screen time, I think this years HM's have had a raw deal having to share their time with gobshites like them.....”

Totally agree with you
Callous
28-06-2015
Originally Posted by TrustFundBaby:
“They would not of been expensive. They are nobodies. This is their only chance to get on tv and become relevant. They would probably of done it for free.”

To be frank ....you could say that for 80% of the celebrities on any celeb reality show.

It's not like the majority of the cast on I'm a Celebrity,Celebrity Masterchef, Strictly Come Dancing and Celebrity Big Brother..are any more famous or relevant that Nikki or Brian.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map