Plus, she seems to have some rather interesting details too:
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s149/...ph2zqdSW4HNI0t
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s149/...ph2zqdSW4HNI0t
According to Helen, Nikki received a formal warning...(link)
1 of 2
Helen just comes across as bitter and jealous that Nikki is popular and liked. Nikki has already spoke about the warning she received...it was for saying that her gay friends refer to her as their faghag. BB told her some viewers might find the term offensive.
Originally Posted by Bagshot85:
“Plus, she seems to have some rather interesting details too:
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s149/...ph2zqdSW4HNI0t”
“Plus, she seems to have some rather interesting details too:
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s149/...ph2zqdSW4HNI0t”
Nikki has come back with a detailed twit longer….. worth reading!!! Refutes everything.
Helen is desperate to paint Nikkei black....She can't get over the fact that she came out to boos and Nikkei came out to massive cheers.....I think she's burned her bridges with BB because of all her sh#t stirring and Twitter rants
Originally Posted by conchie:
“Nikki has come back with a detailed twit longer….. worth reading!!! Refutes everything.”
“Nikki has come back with a detailed twit longer….. worth reading!!! Refutes everything.”
No it doesn't, her denial is very specific:
Quote:
“I was never given a formal warning in relation to Helen Wood.”
“I was never given a formal warning in relation to Helen Wood.”
That implies to me that she DID indeed get a formal warning, else why add that last bit?
She also confuses Helen's comments about the porta cabin as being about the food fight incident when they were about a fire drill (unaired)
And she fails to respond at all to Helen's (IMO very correct) criticism of Nikki fat shaming the other girls.
Nikki's Twitlonger is a load of text but actually says nothing in particular about Helen's claims.
Originally Posted by conchie:
“Nikki has come back with a detailed twit longer….. worth reading!!! Refutes everything.”
“Nikki has come back with a detailed twit longer….. worth reading!!! Refutes everything.”
That should be an interesting read.
Wonder what Harry says too.
Maybe it was a case of Chinese Whispers, and Helen ran with it...
Tbh, I find Nikki and Helen pretty annoying, and disliked them both during their BB stints, and still do.
Originally Posted by spkx:
“No it doesn't, her denial is very specific:
That implies to me that she DID indeed get a formal warning, else why add that last bit?
She also confuses Helen's comments about the porta cabin as being about the food fight incident when they were about a fire drill (unaired)
And she fails to respond at all to Helen's (IMO very correct) criticism of Nikki fat shaming the other girls.
Nikki's Twitlonger is a load of text but actually says nothing in particular about Helen's claims.”
“No it doesn't, her denial is very specific:
That implies to me that she DID indeed get a formal warning, else why add that last bit?
She also confuses Helen's comments about the porta cabin as being about the food fight incident when they were about a fire drill (unaired)
And she fails to respond at all to Helen's (IMO very correct) criticism of Nikki fat shaming the other girls.
Nikki's Twitlonger is a load of text but actually says nothing in particular about Helen's claims.”
Nikki has said she received a warning and what it was for.
Originally Posted by spkx:
“No it doesn't, her denial is very specific:
That implies to me that she DID indeed get a formal warning, else why add that last bit?
She also confuses Helen's comments about the porta cabin as being about the food fight incident when they were about a fire drill (unaired)
And she fails to respond at all to Helen's (IMO very correct) criticism of Nikki fat shaming the other girls.
Nikki's Twitlonger is a load of text but actually says nothing in particular about Helen's claims.”
“No it doesn't, her denial is very specific:
That implies to me that she DID indeed get a formal warning, else why add that last bit?
She also confuses Helen's comments about the porta cabin as being about the food fight incident when they were about a fire drill (unaired)
And she fails to respond at all to Helen's (IMO very correct) criticism of Nikki fat shaming the other girls.
Nikki's Twitlonger is a load of text but actually says nothing in particular about Helen's claims.”
She already said on twitter that the only warning she recieved in the house was for saying that her gay friends call her a faghag...
...she was called in and warned that some might find the word offensive.
Originally Posted by BabelBrook:
“Nikki has said she received a warning and what it was for.”
“Nikki has said she received a warning and what it was for.”
What was it for
Originally Posted by BabelBrook:
“Nikki has said she received a warning and what it was for.”
“Nikki has said she received a warning and what it was for.”
So Helen was right.
Originally Posted by Master Ozzy:
“Helen just comes across as bitter and jealous that Nikki is popular and liked. Nikki has already spoke about the warning she received...it was for saying that her gay friends refer to her as their faghag. BB told her some viewers might find the term offensive.”
“Helen just comes across as bitter and jealous that Nikki is popular and liked. Nikki has already spoke about the warning she received...it was for saying that her gay friends refer to her as their faghag. BB told her some viewers might find the term offensive.”
She didn't "already speak" about it in the sense you're referring. She only mentioned it because Helen had tweeted about it and Nikki was bombarded with tweets and had to admit it - despite all Nikki fans previously claiming it was lies and Nikki favouriting their tweets.
Originally Posted by spkx:
“So Helen was right.”
“So Helen was right.”
Yes and no. Helen was implying it was some major event hidden by BB to protect Nikki rather than a rather pathetic non-PC slap on the wrist.
Originally Posted by spkx:
“So Helen was right.”
“So Helen was right.”
No Helen made it sound like it was really bad and BB didn't show it because it's Nikki, but really they didn't show it because it's not worth talking about.
Originally Posted by BabelBrook:
“Yes and no. Helen was implying it was some major event hidden by BB to protect Nikki rather than a rather pathetic non-PC slap on the wrist.”
“Yes and no. Helen was implying it was some major event hidden by BB to protect Nikki rather than a rather pathetic non-PC slap on the wrist.”
Originally Posted by dirrrty:
“No Helen made it sound like it was really bad and BB didn't show it because it's Nikki, but really they didn't show it because it's not worth talking about.”
“No Helen made it sound like it was really bad and BB didn't show it because it's Nikki, but really they didn't show it because it's not worth talking about.”
All Helen said was "Nikki got a formal warning, not shown." which is 100% true.
Nikki has responded by 'denying' that she had a formal warning "in relation to Helen", but Helen never claimed such a thing. Nor did Helen claim the warning was a 'major event' or 'really bad', or even imply anything about what the warning was about.
Her point wasn't even about the warning per se but just how some things aren't shown, the warning just being an example, although we all knew that anyway.
I found her response interesting and without spin. I'd call it - telling it as it is. It's not sensationalised. I'm not a HUGE fan of Nikki but I don't like to see her ripped apart in a Daily Newspaper - she has every right to defend herself - I think it's a dignified response.
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1smsfm8
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1smsfm8
Originally Posted by Penny Crayon:
“I found her response interesting and without spin. I'd call it - telling it as it is. It's not sensationalised. I'm not a HUGE fan of Nikki but I don't like to see her ripped apart in a Daily Newspaper - she has every right to defend herself - I think it's a dignified response.
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1smsfm8”
“I found her response interesting and without spin. I'd call it - telling it as it is. It's not sensationalised. I'm not a HUGE fan of Nikki but I don't like to see her ripped apart in a Daily Newspaper - she has every right to defend herself - I think it's a dignified response.
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1smsfm8”
I dunno, she denied something Helen didn't claim and didn't respond to arguably Helen's most correct point (Nikki calling other girls out on their weight)
Originally Posted by spkx:
“All Helen said was "Nikki got a formal warning, not shown." which is 100% true.
Nikki has responded by 'denying' that she had a formal warning "in relation to Helen", but Helen never claimed such a thing. Nor did Helen claim the warning was a 'major event', or even imply anything about what the warning was about.
Her point wasn't even about the warning per se but just how some things aren't shown, the warning just being an example, although we all knew that anyway.”
“All Helen said was "Nikki got a formal warning, not shown." which is 100% true.
Nikki has responded by 'denying' that she had a formal warning "in relation to Helen", but Helen never claimed such a thing. Nor did Helen claim the warning was a 'major event', or even imply anything about what the warning was about.
Her point wasn't even about the warning per se but just how some things aren't shown, the warning just being an example, although we all knew that anyway.”
Actually we don't know if it was just a warnng or a formal warning. There's a difference between a warning ..and a formal warning.
Still...I'd imagine most viewers would find it amazingly stupid to give someone a formal warning (or even a basic warning on screen) for saying "my gay friends call me a faghag"...which likely why it wasn't shown.
Helen's a fine one to accuse others over them receiving warnings.... in her series she was given three warnings for her behaviour.
Originally Posted by Callous:
“Actually we don't know if it was just a warnng or a formal warning. There's a difference between a warning ..and a formal warning.
Still...I'd imagine most viewers would find it amazingly stupid to give someone a formal warning (or even a basic warning on screen) for saying "my gay friends call me a faghag"...which likely why it wasn't shown.”
“Actually we don't know if it was just a warnng or a formal warning. There's a difference between a warning ..and a formal warning.
Still...I'd imagine most viewers would find it amazingly stupid to give someone a formal warning (or even a basic warning on screen) for saying "my gay friends call me a faghag"...which likely why it wasn't shown.”
The reasons why it wasn't shown, or even if it was really a formal warning or not, aren't really the point.
My original point was that Nikki's 'denial' was about something that Helen never claimed in the first place, i.e. the warning was in relation to her (Helen).
And again, she completely failed to respond to arguably Helen's only real point about Nikki fat shaming the other girls.
Originally Posted by redex:
“Helen's a fine one to accuse others over them receiving warnings.... in her series she was given three warnings for her behaviour.”
“Helen's a fine one to accuse others over them receiving warnings.... in her series she was given three warnings for her behaviour.”
All of which were shown.
Originally Posted by redex:
“Helen's a fine one to accuse others over them receiving warnings.... in her series she was given three warnings for her behaviour.”
“Helen's a fine one to accuse others over them receiving warnings.... in her series she was given three warnings for her behaviour.”
And the rest
Originally Posted by redex:
“Helen's a fine one to accuse others over them receiving warnings.... in her series she was given three warnings for her behaviour.”
“Helen's a fine one to accuse others over them receiving warnings.... in her series she was given three warnings for her behaviour.”
I recall she was given something like 30 or so in total! Many weren't shown
1 of 2
