Well she wouldn't let Joel have his letter for at start... didn't she EAT it? (probably tasted better than that frozen pizza)

I thought she had to choose a letter to be sacrificed.

Couldn't she have chosen her own? Would that not have been the most admirable thing to do?

Was she allowed to do that ?.

No. First they had to choose a ball from the tombola, then depending on what colour ball they got they had to either choose someone else's letter to eat or they had to choose whether to add £5,000 to the pot or choose someone else's letter to read. Sounds overly complicated because it was. Nobody was going to opt for the money.

I have looked at the Video again and i think she pulled out a lose ball meaning she had no choice but to sacrifice a "fellow housemates" letter. It was the choose balls that gave the option of adding 5000 to the prize fund.

Yep. That's what I meant. Neither ball type would allow them to choose their own letter.

Is that a good thing ?

She was told at the start of the noms task that of any HM spoke there would be consiquenses on the prize fund.
Your telling me she could not have waited five minutes before whining about who got to press the button first?

Exactly and she wasn't very apologetic afterwards. It was such a simple instruction

True. But it was said by BB that there had been numerous rule breaks as a result of HM talking during the task, so she was not solely responsible for the extent of the diminishing of the prize money.