As a viewer, what type of hm do you prefer when the touchy subject of prize money is brought up?

The Chloe/Joel - Not interested in the money, winning purely for winnings sake without it being motivated by money - "I'd take the win over the money"

The Jack - Very interested in the money first and foremost. - "I'd take the money over the win"

Does anyone believe not being interested in £150k when it's on offer is an admirable stance?

I d say depends on which situation, i could go either way

You think Chloe is not interested in the money? The expression on her face on this task disagrees.

Why do they want to win (without the prize money), except to make money from other deals. Why win otherwise, what's the point?

Other than Nick (who's quite well off) they are all desperate for the money....Chloe needs it because she's getting married.....who can blame them anyway

You cant generalize everyone,
lets just say Nick... if i m in Nick's position, i would rather take the Title with no money rather than the money....
He can have the money he want from his Dad, but he cant get the title with money...

But the words coming from her mouth say otherwise - demonising Jack for saying he'd buy his way to the final, claiming she hates the talk of money amongst fellow hm's.

Chloe is archetypal BB audience pleaser. I've seen it many times in the past, giving the public everything you think they want, the "I'm normal me" routine etc. I fully expect her publicly denounce the money this week in order to curry favour with the public.

True, but that's an exception to the rule, as usually the contestants do not have any meaningful money and the winner status enables them to get mag deals etc.

Forget the words, it's all in her eyes.