• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Should sarah have technically been evicted?
graciemay6
06-07-2015
When you think about it, 4 went and 4 came in
But if it was 5in5out , one of chloe and Danny would've gone aswell and if it was 3in3out Sarah would still be in there
It was just because it was 4 out, when technically they could've got away with a 4in 3 out because Aaron had already left that week so they needed a replacement for him, or even the fact that Simon was already a housemate really he'd just been evicted as part of a twist and got his place back

If you look at it like that, big brother could bring her back without getting complaints that she was voted out, as she got the least votes out of the 4
roseblue1
06-07-2015
Yes anyone who liked Roland Rat should have gone.
B L Zeebub
06-07-2015
They promised four out and took money from voters for that.
Syntax Error
06-07-2015
Why single out Sarah?

What about the other three?
Pitman
06-07-2015
I vaguely remember her, discussing the immigrants with the mouthy one that worked in a cafe?
graciemay6
06-07-2015
Originally Posted by Syntax Error:
“Why single out Sarah?

What about the other three?”

Because she got the least votes out of the 4
hisdogspot
06-07-2015
There's 8 of them in there as it is, with little over a week to go

Getting people out is the plan now, not putting people back in
Syntax Error
06-07-2015
Originally Posted by graciemay6:
“Because she got the least votes out of the 4”

Okay, that's fair enough.

I was personally glad she was evicted, because we would have had to endure the spectacle of a will they/won't they with Angry Man Danny & that would have been unbearable for me.
graciemay6
06-07-2015
Originally Posted by Syntax Error:
“Okay, that's fair enough.

I was personally glad she was evicted, because we would have had to endure the spectacle of a will they/won't they with Angry Man Danny & that would have been unbearable for me.”

I agree
I would've much rather sat and watch the Nick and Jade saga that was happening at the time
Annsyre
06-07-2015
Originally Posted by graciemay6:
“When you think about it, 4 went and 4 came in
But if it was 5in5out , one of chloe and Danny would've gone aswell and if it was 3in3out Sarah would still be in there
It was just because it was 4 out, when technically they could've got away with a 4in 3 out because Aaron had already left that week so they needed a replacement for him, or even the fact that Simon was already a housemate really he'd just been evicted as part of a twist and got his place back

If you look at it like that, big brother could bring her back without getting complaints that she was voted out, as she got the least votes out of the 4”

She was dull and dreary and she has long gone. People paid to evict her.
Master Ozzy
06-07-2015
She was nasty and patronising and full of her own self importance.
teenage-monkey
06-07-2015
She was a good leader for that house, really diplomatic. She was able to sort out any problem in the house, sat in her throne within the smoking area.
lulu g
06-07-2015
Originally Posted by graciemay6:
“Because she got the least votes out of the 4”

How do you know?
Hollie_Louise
06-07-2015
But it wasn't five in/five out or three in/three out so the point you're making is ridiculous. You might as well just say "if it was one in, one out the last three would still be there. Odd thread
graciemay6
06-07-2015
Originally Posted by Hollie_Louise:
“But it wasn't five in/five out or three in/three out so the point you're making is ridiculous. You might as well just say "if it was one in, one out the last three would still be there. Odd thread”

Not really because what I'm saying is that Aaron went so they needed a replacement for Aaron anyway so then by getting 3 out plus Aaron would've made up for the 4 new housemates , so with Sarah getting less votes than the other 3, she would most likely be brought back
B L Zeebub
06-07-2015
Originally Posted by graciemay6:
“Not really because what I'm saying is that Aaron went so they needed a replacement for Aaron anyway so then by getting 3 out plus Aaron would've made up for the 4 new housemates , so with Sarah getting less votes than the other 3, she would most likely be brought back”

It's too late.

People have paid for her removal.
Annsyre
06-07-2015
Originally Posted by teenage-monkey:
“She was a good leader for that house, really diplomatic. She was able to sort out any problem in the house, sat in her throne within the smoking area.”

When she wasn't stalking and pawing Danny he Drip.
shelleyj89
06-07-2015
Originally Posted by graciemay6:
“Not really because what I'm saying is that Aaron went so they needed a replacement for Aaron anyway so then by getting 3 out plus Aaron would've made up for the 4 new housemates , so with Sarah getting less votes than the other 3, she would most likely be brought back”

But we don't know that Sarah did get the least votes of the four. We only know that Amy and Sally for the most votes out of all of them. It wasn't specified for the the three.
Alrightmate
06-07-2015
Originally Posted by teenage-monkey:
“She was a good leader for that house, really diplomatic. She was able to sort out any problem in the house, sat in her throne within the smoking area.”

As with any BB 'diplomat', she was only diplomatic when it favoured the people she liked the most.
JanisElizabeth
06-07-2015
Originally Posted by graciemay6:
“When you think about it, 4 went and 4 came in
But if it was 5in5out , one of chloe and Danny would've gone aswell and if it was 3in3out Sarah would still be in there
It was just because it was 4 out, when technically they could've got away with a 4in 3 out because Aaron had already left that week so they needed a replacement for him, or even the fact that Simon was already a housemate really he'd just been evicted as part of a twist and got his place back

If you look at it like that, big brother could bring her back without getting complaints that she was voted out, as she got the least votes out of the 4”

I don't know why anyone cares. IMO she was a rubbish housemate - dour, boring and very very blinkered.
Janette800
06-07-2015
Originally Posted by Master Ozzy:
“She was nasty and patronising and full of her own self importance.”

THIS ↑↑↑↑↑↑
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map