|
||||||||
Tv Dramas vs Soaps? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 411
|
Tv Dramas vs Soaps?
Sadly I'd rather watch a good drama or comedy than any of the soaps these days.
They're are too many episodes, boring characters and bad pacing to name a few. I find myself being a month behind and having to bulk catch up. Anyone else agree? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,952
|
I agree somewhat. A good drama has the ability to have you gripped, laugh, cry, shout at the telly and really give you something to engage in. I don't remember the last time I had the same kind of passion or emotion for a soap, as I do for dramas like 'a song for Jenny' or even 'The Syndicate'. 'Ordinary Lies' was littered with ex soap stars and showed how capable many of then actually are, and I loved it, I doubt any soap can engage an audience like a good drama can, which is a crying shame, because in the past they've definitely managed it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,588
|
I was watching a show the other day and one of the main characters got badly injured, and was I really didn't want the character to die, I then thought how I hadn't felt like this in ages watching the soaps especially hollyoaks, the deaths are so constant on the show that I no longer care about them and they are no longer shocking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,952
|
Quote:
I was watching a show the other day and one of the main characters got badly injured, and was I really didn't want the character to die, I then thought how I hadn't felt like this in ages watching the soaps especially hollyoaks, the deaths are so constant on the show that I no longer care about them and they are no longer shocking.
The Danish are exceptional at producing unmissable drama, even if it is subtitled. We could learn so much from them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Emmerdale
Posts: 4,290
|
I've always thought TV dramas like Broadchurch, Safe House and Prisoners Wives were of better quality than soaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Over the hills and far away
Posts: 12,535
|
Quote:
I've always thought TV dramas like Broadchurch, Safe House and Prisoners Wives were of better quality than soaps
I think the soaps don't have the luxury of high production values. They've got a huge quantity of episodes to go out and limited time to do them. I remember reading an interview with John Michie, who I'd always enjoyed as an actor in Taggart but who was pretty average in Corrie. He said that even the number of cameras they use in soaps is distracting and takes a lot of getting used to. Personally I don't think it's a case of one format being better than the other. The programmes should be judged on their own merits |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,206
|
Dramas aren't up to much either these days. Although I do find they put on better dramas in autumn, winter time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
|
Depends on the drama.
If you churn out a lot of episodes eventually the quality is going to wane a bit. I like Eastenders because it's escapism, my brain isn't required to do much thinking and it's entertaining. I do find there's a lack of feel good dramas, where the heart is, wild at heart, born and bred, William and Mary etc were perfect for Sunday night viewing |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 411
|
America are also doing well with their new drama releases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 699
|
Perhaps its not a case of either but both - yet soaps are fluff and escapism often, or perhaps even a way for the audience to address an issue without having to live through themselves. So they do have a role, whether always good or not is open to debate.
However, if each of the main soaps offered one less episode a week and the two medical hybrids of the Holby-universe a few less episodes a year (Casualty is at 48 eps and Holby City 52 eps per year), the cast and crew would have more time to fine-tune their work. This could have advantages - 1. Blatant continuity errors like the Coronation Street one recently with Kevin Webster's son Jake might be avoided if there way more time available for the production team to double-check themselves 2. Production teams (I'm looking at you Hollyoaks) might not feel obliged to keep producing ever-more over-the-top sensationalism just in-order to keep our attention i.e. plane-crashes/bus-smashes/serial killers etc 3. Viewers might make more of an effort to see every episode rather than feel they could 'miss one here and one there because the next one will be on tomorrow' 4. The broadcasters might feel able to reinvest the money they would other-wise spend on giving something else ago with the money they've saved and maybe find a new hit or give some up-and-comer a chance to make their mark. Slightly less might well be the difference between keeping the genre from reaching saturation-point and dying altogether, which would not be beneficial given soap operas role in giving people their first breaks and developing careers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 510
|
I cared and felt more emotional about a web series I watched over the last 3 days than any soap in the last year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Losing the plot and not caring
Posts: 68,975
|
No contest - dramas for me every time. I watch ED and Corrie purely because there's nothing else on every night at that time. They're OK as a mild diversion and I enjoy them intermittently. On the other hand I actively look forward to almost any drama on any channel because they have a beginning, a middle and an end, a finite and often gripping sl, and are usually full of excellent actors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 411
|
Quote:
Perhaps its not a case of either but both - yet soaps are fluff and escapism often, or perhaps even a way for the audience to address an issue without having to live through themselves. So they do have a role, whether always good or not is open to debate.
However, if each of the main soaps offered one less episode a week and the two medical hybrids of the Holby-universe a few less episodes a year (Casualty is at 48 eps and Holby City 52 eps per year), the cast and crew would have more time to fine-tune their work. This could have advantages - 1. Blatant continuity errors like the Coronation Street one recently with Kevin Webster's son Jake might be avoided if there way more time available for the production team to double-check themselves 2. Production teams (I'm looking at you Hollyoaks) might not feel obliged to keep producing ever-more over-the-top sensationalism just in-order to keep our attention i.e. plane-crashes/bus-smashes/serial killers etc 3. Viewers might make more of an effort to see every episode rather than feel they could 'miss one here and one there because the next one will be on tomorrow' 4. The broadcasters might feel able to reinvest the money they would other-wise spend on giving something else ago with the money they've saved and maybe find a new hit or give some up-and-comer a chance to make their mark. Slightly less might well be the difference between keeping the genre from reaching saturation-point and dying altogether, which would not be beneficial given soap operas role in giving people their first breaks and developing careers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 30,384
|
I watch a lot of soaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
Quote:
Sadly I'd rather watch a good drama or comedy than any of the soaps these days.
They're are too many episodes, boring characters and bad pacing to name a few. I find myself being a month behind and having to bulk catch up. Anyone else agree? You can't beat a really good, well made drama and as well as watching current ones i enjoy countless old ones on DVD. But they have much more money, have the luxury of not having to 'string' stories out or not give characters resolution as they have a definitive beginning, middle and end So, at times i will find the current drama much more gripping than a Soap - The Missing last winter or HUMANS now for example but I wouldn't choose them over the Soaps - i wouldn't choose either over the other. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London Town
Posts: 3,535
|
When I was watching Breaking Bad, it actually reminded me of how I used to feel about soaps (especially from the third season on). I found the story really exciting and the characters fascinating, and couldn't wait to see what would happen next.
I never feel like that about soaps any more - well, perhaps once a year at the most. I think that the whole industry around soaps, with the publicity and spoilers they put out, has lessened the impact that they have and the potential for surprise (although EE occasionally tries to surprise us). Plus the huge number of episodes has been really detrimental to the effectiveness of cliffhangers. It's not really practical or realistic to have an exciting cliffhanger five times per week. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,407
|
Much prefer dramas these day, purely because soaps give out too many spoilers, a lot of publicity and become predictable. I love watching Silent Witness as it gets my mind thinking, problem solving etc and I actually learn something new. Soaps are no longer gripping anymore and I am constantly on the edge of my seat when I watch stuff like Silent Witness, cannot remember the last time I felt that way about a soap.
Soaps are becoming to time consuming, they take up a lot of time during the week, I can only watch one soap now as I didn't have enough time for two. Also soaps drag out storylines for far too long, one storyline on a soap normally takes the same amount of time as a whole season of a drama. Finally the acting quality is much higher on dramas compared to soaps/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,461
|
Quote:
Sadly I'd rather watch a good drama or comedy than any of the soaps these days.
They're are too many episodes, boring characters and bad pacing to name a few. I find myself being a month behind and having to bulk catch up. Anyone else agree? |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 411
|
Thanks dee for the wisdom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,573
|
Quote:
America are also doing well with their new drama releases.
By comparison our tv dramas are too grim and lack the style and pizzaz of American tv. Our soaps are now spread to thinly and populated by far far too many appallingly bad, hammy, gurning or wooden actors. It's easy to understand why they are losing their appeal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Over the hills and far away
Posts: 12,535
|
I find that whenever this discussion arises people forget about the poor or average dramas which have been made in recent years and focus on the ones they've enjoyed. The second Broadchurch was terrible and then there are things like'The Little House,' and 'Lightfields' which are instantly forgettable, Sunday afternoon fodder.
Yes there have been some great dramas but there's also a lot that are average or poor. Why not judge the individual programme on its own merits? |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,573
|
Quote:
I
Why not judge the individual programme on its own merits? Our soaps are no longer producing the distictive classic big name characters they once did. They'll all a bit much of a muchness or plain dreadful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Middleton
Posts: 13,839
|
No way you can compare a class act show like Breaking Bad and The Wire or the earlier series in Prison Break to a soap with overated trash actors and actresses.
Yes we watch them they are fun and have good times but just not a chance, give me a well acted drama with proper writing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Over the hills and far away
Posts: 12,535
|
Quote:
No way you can compare a class act show like Breaking Bad and The Wire or the earlier series in Prison Break to a soap with overated trash actors and actresses.
Yes we watch them they are fun and have good times but just not a chance, give me a well acted drama with proper writing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Middleton
Posts: 13,839
|
Quote:
But not all dramas have this. Can you honestly say there haven't been many times when you've given up on one due to poor characterisation and stories?
To be fair soaps have been going on for so long they are going to be below average you can't keep it up, but still when soaps were at their best it never came close. A Drama can be so good that it cannot be improved, but this is rare the only three I can think off that I named personally above, Boardwalk Empire has some amazing settings though that was a class Drama. I find it unfair to compare say a month of Kush and Stacey to a peice of The Wire, infact it is rather funny, not that anyone here is really comparing. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:30.



