DS Forums

 
 

Eastenders - Is Sean Kat's son?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-07-2015, 23:10
Harlowe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,370

http://www.closeronline.co.uk/2015/0...an-slaters-mum

Interesting theory or one that don't make sense.

Thoughts?
Harlowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 06-07-2015, 23:19
QueenAmy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,547
I thought that it could be possible when the whole Kat's Twin was revealed, BUT now it seems pretty ridiculous, I can bet that even Jean isn't that stupid enough to forget that she didn't actually give birth to Sean
QueenAmy is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2015, 23:21
Hildaonpluto
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
I would be gobsmacked if this was true and I would also question the point of going down this avenue?
Hildaonpluto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2015, 23:27
jimbo23
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,066
we need a superfan who has all the eps tapped, to go back though and work out when seans birthday was,

also, sean got married, had driving licence, passport, surely he would have known if jean wasnt his mom

its completley re writing history if they do go with that, plus kind of pointless if the actor who plays him isnt wanting to come back, there must be no plans to re cast with his face on stacey fridge day in day out,
jimbo23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2015, 23:40
NoughtiesMusic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North of England
Posts: 14,124
I would LOVE for Sean to appear on screen with Kat and Zoe.

If he is Kat's son (unless it's all a big red herring) as well as the fact that they've used pictures of both Michelle Ryan and Robert Kazinsky, maybe they will be coming back for very one off appearances. Either with this key storyline, or in the Kat and Alfie spinoff.
NoughtiesMusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2015, 23:50
kitkat1971
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
I thought that it could be possible when the whole Kat's Twin was revealed, BUT now it seems pretty ridiculous, I can bet that even Jean isn't that stupid enough to forget that she didn't actually give birth to Sean
Maybe she knows she doesn't and she knows the evidence is what the key unlocks. That is why she went nuts.

The only flaw in that is her telling Stacey that she believed Sean would be the one to get Bi-Polar from her - hardly possible for there to be a genetic link if she knew he wasn't hers.
kitkat1971 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 06:27
Aaron_Silver
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,756
I sincerely hope not, it doesn't feel right to me, and is there not too much of an age gap between the actor that plays him and Zoe? Feels all wrong to me anyway
Aaron_Silver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 07:05
NoughtiesMusic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North of England
Posts: 14,124
I sincerely hope not, it doesn't feel right to me, and is there not too much of an age gap between the actor that plays him and Zoe? Feels all wrong to me anyway
Robert Kazkinsky's DOB is November 1983. He's only a few months older than Zoe. Michelle Ryan's DOB is April 1984. They're within the same age group.
NoughtiesMusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 07:32
Adrian_Ward1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Plymouth Devon
Posts: 12,497
Can you imagine if he is.
Adrian_Ward1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 07:42
bass55
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
I'll be so mad if this turns out to be true, it would mean everything we saw between Jean and Sean was a complete lie. It's one retcon too far.
bass55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 07:50
joe gillott
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Master of all fit EE males
Posts: 6,529
I'll be so mad if this turns out to be true, it would mean everything we saw between Jean and Sean was a complete lie. It's one retcon too far.
This.
joe gillott is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 08:42
Keibro
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,351
I sincerely hope not, it doesn't feel right to me, and is there not too much of an age gap between the actor that plays him and Zoe? Feels all wrong to me anyway
I agree
Keibro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 09:26
olivej
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,621
no, just no, 100 times no!
olivej is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 10:10
nick202
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,431
I can't see that they would do it with Kat out of the picture for the time being - it would be rather self-defeating
nick202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 10:13
bean_of_sb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 4,617
With Kat away on hiatus, and Zoe and Sean not part of the cast, it seems an odd time to do the storyline if it's true.
bean_of_sb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 12:54
AcerBen
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 13,155
I'll be so mad if this turns out to be true, it would mean everything we saw between Jean and Sean was a complete lie. It's one retcon too far.
It's not a retcon though
AcerBen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 12:55
AcerBen
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 13,155
Robert Kazkinsky's DOB is November 1983. He's only a few months older than Zoe. Michelle Ryan's DOB is April 1984. They're within the same age group.
And of course it's perfectly possible they changed his DOB to keep the secret
AcerBen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 13:29
bass55
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
It's not a retcon though
It's 100% retcon.

Throughout Jean's entire time on the show and through all of her interaction with Sean there was never any hint that he wasn't her biological son. If this happens it will change an established fact of the show, i.e. a retroactive continuity (retcon).
bass55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 15:17
lotty27
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In the wine cellar *hic*
Posts: 17,562
Maybe she knows she doesn't and she knows the evidence is what the key unlocks. That is why she went nuts.

The only flaw in that is her telling Stacey that she believed Sean would be the one to get Bi-Polar from her - hardly possible for there to be a genetic link if she knew he wasn't hers.
Jean definitely knows the secret of that key, no doubt about that after her reaction last night and whatever it is they're making it look like a HUGE secret. Whatever it is I hope it isn't a let down after all this!

But I don't think I'd like it for Sean to be Kat's secret son for all the reasons stated in the post below.

I'll be so mad if this turns out to be true, it would mean everything we saw between Jean and Sean was a complete lie. It's one retcon too far.
Agreed.

With Kat away on hiatus, and Zoe and Sean not part of the cast, it seems an odd time to do the storyline if it's true.
True, unless there's going to be some surprise returns for one or two episodes?
lotty27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 15:27
Zone_Out
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,044
What happened to plans for a disabled actor coming in? Or did I just imagine this? Maybe that will be Kats other kid?
Zone_Out is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 15:35
Niamh.
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 80
I think that's almost certainly it, it's what i thought the minute that nun said she'd had a boys as well
Niamh. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 15:48
joe gillott
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Master of all fit EE males
Posts: 6,529
What happened to plans for a disabled actor coming in? Or did I just imagine this? Maybe that will be Kats other kid?
Donna has been in the show since april. Do you meab transgender as one of those were coming in? If you class that as a disability...well...

They announced it again too early...feels like it was announced 6 months ago...
joe gillott is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 15:52
Hankshaw
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,889
It's 100% retcon.

Throughout Jean's entire time on the show and through all of her interaction with Sean there was never any hint that he wasn't her biological son. If this happens it will change an established fact of the show, i.e. a retroactive continuity (retcon).
What's a hint that someone is a person's biological son?

There was never any hint that Jean didn't raise Sean as her own. That would be true even if she hadn't given birth to him. You would imagine Viv would have had Brian and Jean take Sean on the day of his birth. She wouldn't have risked taking him back to the house.

As for people saying Sean would have realised Jean wasn't his mother when he saw his birth certificate. Surely Jean and Brian would have registered themselves as his parents.

Why would they make him Kat's son is a mystery though. Even for this spin off I'd be surprised to see Robert Kazinsky and Michelle Ryan turn up. I think the key will probably be Stacey's own storyline. She hasn't really had a big story thats all her own. The secret son of Kat's should be about her and Alfie.
Hankshaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 15:59
Aaron_Silver
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,756
What's a hint that someone is a person's biological son?

There was never any hint that Jean didn't raise Sean as her own. That would be true even if she hadn't given birth to him. You would imagine Viv would have had Brian and Jean take Sean on the day of his birth. She wouldn't have risked taking him back to the house.

As for people saying Sean would have realised Jean wasn't his mother when he saw his birth certificate. Surely Jean and Brian would have registered themselves as his parents.

Why would they make him Kat's son is a mystery though. Even for this spin off I'd be surprised to see Robert Kazinsky and Michelle Ryan turn up. I think the key will probably be Stacey's own storyline. She hasn't really had a big story thats all her own. The secret son of Kat's should be about her and Alfie.
Excellent well thought out post
Aaron_Silver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2015, 16:24
bass55
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
What's a hint that someone is a person's biological son?

There was never any hint that Jean didn't raise Sean as her own. That would be true even if she hadn't given birth to him. You would imagine Viv would have had Brian and Jean take Sean on the day of his birth. She wouldn't have risked taking him back to the house.

As for people saying Sean would have realised Jean wasn't his mother when he saw his birth certificate. Surely Jean and Brian would have registered themselves as his parents.

Why would they make him Kat's son is a mystery though. Even for this spin off I'd be surprised to see Robert Kazinsky and Michelle Ryan turn up. I think the key will probably be Stacey's own storyline. She hasn't really had a big story thats all her own. The secret son of Kat's should be about her and Alfie.
It's a silly twist. Sean always had a difficult relationship with his mother but it was never even suggested that it stemmed from the fact he wasn't her biological son. The writers never gave us any reason to doubt that both Sean and Stacey were Jean's children. Throwing in a "Sean was secretly adopted" twist many years after Sean appeared on screen is totally unnecessary, especially if he is Kat's son.
bass55 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:32.