|
||||||||
Eastenders - Is Sean Kat's son? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,370
|
Eastenders - Is Sean Kat's son?
http://www.closeronline.co.uk/2015/0...an-slaters-mum
Interesting theory or one that don't make sense. Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,547
|
I thought that it could be possible when the whole Kat's Twin was revealed, BUT now it seems pretty ridiculous, I can bet that even Jean isn't that stupid enough to forget that she didn't actually give birth to Sean
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
|
I would be gobsmacked if this was true and I would also question the point of going down this avenue?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,066
|
we need a superfan who has all the eps tapped, to go back though and work out when seans birthday was,
also, sean got married, had driving licence, passport, surely he would have known if jean wasnt his mom its completley re writing history if they do go with that, plus kind of pointless if the actor who plays him isnt wanting to come back, there must be no plans to re cast with his face on stacey fridge day in day out, |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North of England
Posts: 14,124
|
I would LOVE for Sean to appear on screen with Kat and Zoe.
If he is Kat's son (unless it's all a big red herring) as well as the fact that they've used pictures of both Michelle Ryan and Robert Kazinsky, maybe they will be coming back for very one off appearances. Either with this key storyline, or in the Kat and Alfie spinoff. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
|
Quote:
I thought that it could be possible when the whole Kat's Twin was revealed, BUT now it seems pretty ridiculous, I can bet that even Jean isn't that stupid enough to forget that she didn't actually give birth to Sean
The only flaw in that is her telling Stacey that she believed Sean would be the one to get Bi-Polar from her - hardly possible for there to be a genetic link if she knew he wasn't hers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,756
|
I sincerely hope not, it doesn't feel right to me, and is there not too much of an age gap between the actor that plays him and Zoe? Feels all wrong to me anyway
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North of England
Posts: 14,124
|
Quote:
I sincerely hope not, it doesn't feel right to me, and is there not too much of an age gap between the actor that plays him and Zoe? Feels all wrong to me anyway
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Plymouth Devon
Posts: 12,497
|
Can you imagine if he is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
I'll be so mad if this turns out to be true, it would mean everything we saw between Jean and Sean was a complete lie. It's one retcon too far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Master of all fit EE males
Posts: 6,529
|
Quote:
I'll be so mad if this turns out to be true, it would mean everything we saw between Jean and Sean was a complete lie. It's one retcon too far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,351
|
Quote:
I sincerely hope not, it doesn't feel right to me, and is there not too much of an age gap between the actor that plays him and Zoe? Feels all wrong to me anyway
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,621
|
no, just no, 100 times no!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,431
|
I can't see that they would do it with Kat out of the picture for the time being - it would be rather self-defeating
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 4,617
|
With Kat away on hiatus, and Zoe and Sean not part of the cast, it seems an odd time to do the storyline if it's true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 13,155
|
Quote:
I'll be so mad if this turns out to be true, it would mean everything we saw between Jean and Sean was a complete lie. It's one retcon too far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 13,155
|
Quote:
Robert Kazkinsky's DOB is November 1983. He's only a few months older than Zoe. Michelle Ryan's DOB is April 1984. They're within the same age group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
Quote:
It's not a retcon though
Throughout Jean's entire time on the show and through all of her interaction with Sean there was never any hint that he wasn't her biological son. If this happens it will change an established fact of the show, i.e. a retroactive continuity (retcon). |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: In the wine cellar *hic*
Posts: 17,562
|
Quote:
Maybe she knows she doesn't and she knows the evidence is what the key unlocks. That is why she went nuts.
The only flaw in that is her telling Stacey that she believed Sean would be the one to get Bi-Polar from her - hardly possible for there to be a genetic link if she knew he wasn't hers. But I don't think I'd like it for Sean to be Kat's secret son for all the reasons stated in the post below. Quote:
I'll be so mad if this turns out to be true, it would mean everything we saw between Jean and Sean was a complete lie. It's one retcon too far.
Quote:
With Kat away on hiatus, and Zoe and Sean not part of the cast, it seems an odd time to do the storyline if it's true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,044
|
What happened to plans for a disabled actor coming in? Or did I just imagine this? Maybe that will be Kats other kid?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 80
|
I think that's almost certainly it, it's what i thought the minute that nun said she'd had a boys as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Master of all fit EE males
Posts: 6,529
|
Quote:
What happened to plans for a disabled actor coming in? Or did I just imagine this? Maybe that will be Kats other kid?
They announced it again too early...feels like it was announced 6 months ago... |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,889
|
Quote:
It's 100% retcon.
Throughout Jean's entire time on the show and through all of her interaction with Sean there was never any hint that he wasn't her biological son. If this happens it will change an established fact of the show, i.e. a retroactive continuity (retcon). There was never any hint that Jean didn't raise Sean as her own. That would be true even if she hadn't given birth to him. You would imagine Viv would have had Brian and Jean take Sean on the day of his birth. She wouldn't have risked taking him back to the house. As for people saying Sean would have realised Jean wasn't his mother when he saw his birth certificate. Surely Jean and Brian would have registered themselves as his parents. Why would they make him Kat's son is a mystery though. Even for this spin off I'd be surprised to see Robert Kazinsky and Michelle Ryan turn up. I think the key will probably be Stacey's own storyline. She hasn't really had a big story thats all her own. The secret son of Kat's should be about her and Alfie. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,756
|
Quote:
What's a hint that someone is a person's biological son?
There was never any hint that Jean didn't raise Sean as her own. That would be true even if she hadn't given birth to him. You would imagine Viv would have had Brian and Jean take Sean on the day of his birth. She wouldn't have risked taking him back to the house. As for people saying Sean would have realised Jean wasn't his mother when he saw his birth certificate. Surely Jean and Brian would have registered themselves as his parents. Why would they make him Kat's son is a mystery though. Even for this spin off I'd be surprised to see Robert Kazinsky and Michelle Ryan turn up. I think the key will probably be Stacey's own storyline. She hasn't really had a big story thats all her own. The secret son of Kat's should be about her and Alfie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 9,412
|
Quote:
What's a hint that someone is a person's biological son?
There was never any hint that Jean didn't raise Sean as her own. That would be true even if she hadn't given birth to him. You would imagine Viv would have had Brian and Jean take Sean on the day of his birth. She wouldn't have risked taking him back to the house. As for people saying Sean would have realised Jean wasn't his mother when he saw his birth certificate. Surely Jean and Brian would have registered themselves as his parents. Why would they make him Kat's son is a mystery though. Even for this spin off I'd be surprised to see Robert Kazinsky and Michelle Ryan turn up. I think the key will probably be Stacey's own storyline. She hasn't really had a big story thats all her own. The secret son of Kat's should be about her and Alfie. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:32.



