|
||||||||
'I did it for the good of the group' |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 192
|
'I did it for the good of the group'
Joel stated the only reason he hit the button was to stop the money going down for the winner, yet burned 2.5k on a pizza and helped initiate and took part in both so called rebellions {he does rather like to do this}. How do these acts reconcile with his words?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,690
|
He's a politician?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 28,579
|
Quote:
Joel stated the only reason he hit the button was to stop the money going down for the winner, yet burned 2.5k on a pizza and helped initiate and took part in both so called rebellions {he does rather like to do this}. How do these acts reconcile with his words?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 269
|
The pizza incident was funny, and I really don't think he gives a rats ass about the winner or the group. I hope he wins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,372
|
Quote:
Joel stated the only reason he hit the button was to stop the money going down for the winner, yet burned 2.5k on a pizza and helped initiate and took part in both so called rebellions {he does rather like to do this}. How do these acts reconcile with his words?
hypocrisy. Lets face it Joel wanted to be able to nom Sam instead of the core group |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 192
|
He went for that button faster than a warm turd down a ski slope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 192
|
Quote:
The pizza incident was funny, and I really don't think he gives a rats ass about the winner or the group. I hope he wins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,690
|
Quote:
Are you suggesting he's simply a liar then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
Quote:
Joel stated the only reason he hit the button was to stop the money going down for the winner, yet burned 2.5k on a pizza and helped initiate and took part in both so called rebellions {he does rather like to do this}. How do these acts reconcile with his words?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 269
|
Quote:
Are you suggesting he's simply a liar then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: In front of t'tele
Posts: 5,958
|
Quote:
he also was the first to break the NO talking rule.
hypocrisy. Lets face it Joel wanted to be able to nom Sam instead of the core group He nominated Sam because she was the easiest to nominate, which is probably why Danny pounced on it and when he got it, chose the second easiest, Harry. Given half the chance I'm pretty sure everyone would choose Sam first bar Chloe and possibly Harry |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:23.

