Joel stated the only reason he hit the button was to stop the money going down for the winner, yet burned 2.5k on a pizza and helped initiate and took part in both so called rebellions {he does rather like to do this}. How do these acts reconcile with his words?

He's a politician?

Because he saved so much... he rewarded himself.

The pizza incident was funny, and I really don't think he gives a rats ass about the winner or the group. I hope he wins.

he also was the first to break the NO talking rule.

hypocrisy.

Lets face it Joel wanted to be able to nom Sam instead of the core group

He went for that button faster than a warm turd down a ski slope.

Are you suggesting he's simply a liar then?

He's a lying liar.

The truth is he his the button because he wanted immunity and to have an 'easy' choice nominating. Danny would have nominated Sam too given the chance; they all would have done. So is he pulling a fast one with this one sentence which is now being micro- analysed? Yes.

I'm not suggesting that, but I do think he's playing the game.

The only one I heard violating that rule multiple times was Chloe!

He nominated Sam because she was the easiest to nominate, which is probably why Danny pounced on it and when he got it, chose the second easiest, Harry. Given half the chance I'm pretty sure everyone would choose Sam first bar Chloe and possibly Harry