DS Forums

 
 

What will politicians do when there are no/few hard working families due to robots?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-08-2015, 22:03
KarlSomething
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 3,398
Why not just regular taxes? If all profits and income is taxed at a sufficient level, the flow of money will still be mostly the same.

Just have to avoid designing/retaining loopholes for those who control the most resources.

Won't the politicians be replaced as well? Actually some MP's could be replaced by current robots and no one would notice a difference.
If anything, freeing up human workers should mean more people can be politicians. And maybe we need to make sure there's a higher replacement rate and better rotation of people with political power.
KarlSomething is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 09-08-2015, 22:11
stoatie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: By the Skeleton Tree.
Posts: 56,603

Take the battle to the toasters and avenge their deaths?
stoatie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2015, 22:14
jcafcw
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,439
The wonderful Iain M Banks has already imagined such a time.

We will be looked after by benevolent AI minds who will provide everything we desire. Work will be optional and we will life in a post-scarcity society.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture
jcafcw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 01:19
Mesostim
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,514
Of course it depends on what you mean by human level intelligence - that could mean the intelligence of a 3 year old - but nobody is going to put a 3 year old in charge
the labour party did.
Hehehehehe that's right!!! The Labour party totally did that!!! Oh wait... no they didn't
Mesostim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 01:21
dodrade
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,106
Give robots the vote?
dodrade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 02:04
exlordlucan
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Garden of England
Posts: 33,702
I remember back in the 70s it was seen as a positive thing, people working fewer hours which meant more leisure time and better health, in fact leisure centers were being built at that time as if in preparation and were featured in Tomorrows World as such.

For some reason that all stopped and so did the prospect of more leisure, people are now having to do two jobs to make ends meet and the jobs are mainly in the service industry where robots haven't yet taken over.

What will govt do?

It can't afford to keep everybody in money so like it or not companies will have to take their share and fork out, after all it's they who are the winners here.
exlordlucan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 05:32
RubyNyx
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Wolfsbane Lane
Posts: 1,298

Implode hopefully
RubyNyx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 07:37
crystallad
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,512
I've often thought this with supermarket self scan. Are products cheaper or profits bigger?
There should be a form of tax just like a human has to pay.
crystallad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 08:35
Aristaeus
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 3,201
the labour party did.

i am reminded of the problem of.........when robots have taken all the jobs, how do humans afford to buy the products they manufacture?
State redistribution of goods.
Basically communism.
Aristaeus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 08:40
Aristaeus
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 3,201
I remember back in the 70s it was seen as a positive thing, people working fewer hours which meant more leisure time and better health, in fact leisure centers were being built at that time as if in preparation and were featured in Tomorrows World as such.

For some reason that all stopped and so did the prospect of more leisure, people are now having to do two jobs to make ends meet and the jobs are mainly in the service industry where robots haven't yet taken over.

What will govt do?

It can't afford to keep everybody in money so like it or not companies will have to take their share and fork out, after all it's they who are the winners here.
Yep. Automation was assumed would result in more leisure time because it would take less hours to do the same level of productivity. But they forgot this is a capitalist economy, so bosses kept the hours the same and got more productivity out of us, whilst not increasing our wages in line with productivity.

I remember seeing a graph once in regards to the US economy; worker productivity had gone up about 400% since the 70's, but wages had stayed the same in real terms.
Aristaeus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 09:14
nathanbrazil
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: AccountKiller
Posts: 8,749
Tax the robots, of course.
nathanbrazil is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 16:30
Bacon&Eggs
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,806
Tax the robots, of course.
The trouble is you'd have to tax the manufacturer the full cost (profit included) of their product in order to allow the idle citizens to purchase it. What we really need, assuming no ones going to call a halt to this robot desecration of the workplace, is a profit free economy.
Bacon&Eggs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 16:48
thenetworkbabe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,224
What's the current % of the workforce that produces goods , ie industry and agriculture

a hundred years ago it was probably 95%

50 years ago it was probably 40%

now......20% ?

that trend will just continue and the rest of the population will do non-productive things like they do now.......working in cinemas, coffee shops, care homes........shuffling around the goods and serving other people who an hour later might be serving you........the money moves around. Everyone spends which transfers money to someone else who works in a shop or garage

Basically the vast majority of the population are non productive and just shuffle around the money in exchange for services........that will be a larger and larger % of the population.
And increasingly the jobs of the comfortable many depend on there being enough people doing similar jobs, some people on considerably more money , and a few people on a lot more, paying for their services.

Corbyn still lives in the world of the 85 % scraping by earning factory wages, and the rest being those up or downstairs. A look around Islington however reveals that his constituents are working in cafes and restaurants, boutiques, dog grooming studios, nail bars, theatres, art galleries, and antique shops- that depend on someone else having excess money to spend on things that are unnecessary. If you tax those on middle incomes by the amount Corbyn proposes, you just end up with mass unemployment.
thenetworkbabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 16:53
thenetworkbabe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,224
The trouble is you'd have to tax the manufacturer the full cost (profit included) of their product in order to allow the idle citizens to purchase it. What we really need, assuming no ones going to call a halt to this robot desecration of the workplace, is a profit free economy.
Russia tried that. What was made, or not made, didn't match any demand for it, and, as there was no incentive to do anything, most people didn't bother . Russia tried , and failed, to incentivise people by shooting them - but even that might not make sense with robots.
thenetworkbabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 17:04
paulschapman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 24,735
The trouble is you'd have to tax the manufacturer the full cost (profit included) of their product in order to allow the idle citizens to purchase it. What we really need, assuming no ones going to call a halt to this robot desecration of the workplace, is a profit free economy.
At what level - companies work on a margin that can be anything from 1-2% and 50%. So you are going to have a whole load of ex-companies employing ex-workers or not as the case maybe.

What's the current % of the workforce that produces goods , ie industry and agriculture

a hundred years ago it was probably 95%

50 years ago it was probably 40%

now......20% ?
I think you will find it is 12%. However look at Agriculture - originally pretty much the whole country was employed in farming - it is now 2%.

Every phase of technological advance has resulted in more jobs - because nobody knows what jobs will be created by the new technology - so the job I do did not exist 50 years ago.
paulschapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 21:14
Net Nut
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,231
At what level - companies work on a margin that can be anything from 1-2% and 50%. So you are going to have a whole load of ex-companies employing ex-workers or not as the case maybe.



I think you will find it is 12%. However look at Agriculture - originally pretty much the whole country was employed in farming - it is now 2%.

Every phase of technological advance has resulted in more jobs - because nobody knows what jobs will be created by the new technology - so the job I do did not exist 50 years ago.
Not this phase as any new jobs would be able to be done by human like robots/androids.
Net Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2015, 21:30
swingaleg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 76,811
Not this phase as any new jobs would be able to be done by human like robots/androids.
not so sure about that........more and more people will just be employed to shuffle the money around by performing services

there'll be more coffee shops, more hairdressers.......would you really want a robot cutting your hair when the point of going to the hairdresser is to spend an hour being pampered and having a chat

I shuffle information from one place to another and charge people for doing it.......I don't really produce anything

the robots might produce goods but I think personal services will always be done by people........it's unlikely you'll go to a robot dentist or chuck money in a hat for a robot street entertainer or pay to see a robot theatre production of Macbeth..........very few of us will produce anything. We'll all be sending money around the circle in return for personal services
swingaleg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2015, 19:32
Net Nut
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,231
not so sure about that........more and more people will just be employed to shuffle the money around by performing services

there'll be more coffee shops, more hairdressers.......would you really want a robot cutting your hair when the point of going to the hairdresser is to spend an hour being pampered and having a chat

I shuffle information from one place to another and charge people for doing it.......I don't really produce anything

the robots might produce goods but I think personal services will always be done by people........it's unlikely you'll go to a robot dentist or chuck money in a hat for a robot street entertainer or pay to see a robot theatre production of Macbeth..........very few of us will produce anything. We'll all be sending money around the circle in return for personal services
They will be able to do anything because in the end they could be made indiscriminable from humans.
Net Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2015, 21:14
thenetworkbabe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,224
not so sure about that........more and more people will just be employed to shuffle the money around by performing services

there'll be more coffee shops, more hairdressers.......would you really want a robot cutting your hair when the point of going to the hairdresser is to spend an hour being pampered and having a chat

I shuffle information from one place to another and charge people for doing it.......I don't really produce anything

the robots might produce goods but I think personal services will always be done by people........it's unlikely you'll go to a robot dentist or chuck money in a hat for a robot street entertainer or pay to see a robot theatre production of Macbeth..........very few of us will produce anything. We'll all be sending money around the circle in return for personal services
True - just think of all the jobs that didn't exist in 1960 or 70 - from financial advisers, kitchen designers,or IT specialists, to dog walkers, nail technicians, and fashion designers. Or the expansion in the numbers of taxi drivers, vets, care workers, social workers, lecturers, estate agents, restaurant staff, or travel agents. Or there's the upgrading of typists and nurses and hairdressers. .

One of the problems is that much of that needs average incomes that are higher overall, and many need enough people with incomes well above the average, to pay for their services. The alternative is nothing happening. A good example is the theatre- when,for most shows, if there are not 300+ people paying £60-90 for a seat, there's not enough coming in for the other 700 in the audience to see a show, and there's a hundred actors, and theatre staff ,on the dole.
thenetworkbabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2015, 21:17
Gormagon
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,439
True - just think of all the jobs that didn't exist in 1960 or 70 - from financial advisers, kitchen designers,or IT specialists, to dog walkers, nail technicians, and fashion designers. Or the expansion in the numbers of taxi drivers, vets, care workers, social workers, lecturers, estate agents, restaurant staff, or travel agents. Or there's the upgrading of typists and nurses and hairdressers. .

One of the problems is that much of that needs average incomes that are higher overall, and many need enough people with incomes well above the average, to pay for their services. The alternative is nothing happening. A good example is the theatre- when,for most shows, if there are not 300+ people paying £60-90 for a seat, there's not enough coming in for the other 700 in the audience to see a show, and there's a hundred actors, and theatre staff ,on the dole.
Edinburgh Festival, I was at a show tonight. 80% were other performers. It was crap.
Gormagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2015, 21:31
Regis Magnae
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,637
there'll be more coffee shops, more hairdressers.......would you really want a robot cutting your hair when the point of going to the hairdresser is to spend an hour being pampered and having a chat
Would the gap between rich and poor increase with such a glut of people providing the same basic services ?
Regis Magnae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2015, 23:27
Lyricalis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lost
Posts: 43,320
Would the gap between rich and poor increase with such a glut of people providing the same basic services ?
The widening gap is an inherent aspect of capitalism when there are ineffective policies in place for wealth redistribution. It really comes down to capital being able to move around the world much more easily now, but taxation and people (unless you're wealthy, you can pretty much live anywhere if you plonk down enough investment money) being controlled at a local level.
Lyricalis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 21:44
Net Nut
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,231
Has anyone seen this yet, Robot Revolution on Sky?


http://news.sky.com/story/1544464/ro...-happening-now

"Robot Revolution: The Future Is Happening Now"

http://news.sky.com/story/1544884/ro...-take-your-job

"Robot Revolution: Will Machines Take Your Job?"

http://news.sky.com/story/1545155/ro...tehall-inquiry

"Robot Job Threat Focus Of Whitehall Inquiry"


Are we going to need a new economic model to pay for the mass unemployment that the robots are going to create soon?
Net Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 22:01
Landis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,751
My instincts are that there will be a Drone tragedy soon. First of many. And that this will slow things down a bit as legislation kicks in much harder from governments saying: What were we thinking? Amazon dropping a George Forman Grill on your head 5 seconds after you open the front door?

But I am fed up of hearing that your driverless car can kill you. This is impossible. *



* Except for those odd occasions when it catches fire 3 seconds after completing it's reverse manoeuvre into the garage which forms the ground floor of your town house.......
Landis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2015, 22:35
Net Nut
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,231
Perhaps to preserve jobs for the young manual workers would not have to work into their mid and late sixties when their bones and joints have been worn out?
Net Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:10.