What is his obsession with other peoples arguments? It would not be so bad if he could string a sentence together.
Danny involving himself in others arguements
1 of 2
Agreed, he's so annoying.
He seems to think that all the other HMs are children & he is their parent.
He seems to think that all the other HMs are children & he is their parent.
He is seemingly, the moral compass of the house, the alpha male. The voice of reason.
What a sad state of affairs it is when I long for Keiron to come back and dethrone him.
What a sad state of affairs it is when I long for Keiron to come back and dethrone him.
He looked like Harry's dad last night telling her not to get involved. He's an embarrassment. And didn't he say something like "Chloe can stand up for herself" or "Chloe can fight her own battles"? Why has he been jumping to her defence for the last 8 weeks then? He always contradicts himself.
Ironic he was getting involved himself while having a go at her for getting involved.
He annoyed me last night when Jack asked Harry if she could let Nick go to the bathroom and before Harry got a chance to speak Danny barked "No, he can wait".
I thought "Who died and put you in charge?"
He annoyed me last night when Jack asked Harry if she could let Nick go to the bathroom and before Harry got a chance to speak Danny barked "No, he can wait".
I thought "Who died and put you in charge?"
Originally Posted by bananaman_007:
“What is his obsession with other peoples arguments? It would not be so bad if he could string a sentence together.”
“What is his obsession with other peoples arguments? It would not be so bad if he could string a sentence together.”
He's gotta get airtime somehow hasn't he? Certainly wont be from his riveting conversational skills or his sense of humour.
Originally Posted by bananaman_007:
“What is his obsession with other peoples arguments? It would not be so bad if he could string a sentence together.”
“What is his obsession with other peoples arguments? It would not be so bad if he could string a sentence together.”
But you misunderstand - he is their Knight in Shining Armour protecting them and saving them from themselves.
Originally Posted by bananaman_007:
“What is his obsession with other peoples arguments? It would not be so bad if he could string a sentence together.”
“What is his obsession with other peoples arguments? It would not be so bad if he could string a sentence together.”
He really should wear his pants on the outside and become a fully fledged Superhero
Unconvincing attempt to try and win the show but he has neither the intellect or the personality to play the daddy of the house roll.
Even if he is being himself everything about him is 'underdone ' for a winner of reality show like BB.
Even if he is being himself everything about him is 'underdone ' for a winner of reality show like BB.
so which is it?
Originally Posted by bananaman_007:
“What is his obsession with other peoples arguments? It would not be so bad if he could string a sentence together.”
“What is his obsession with other peoples arguments? It would not be so bad if he could string a sentence together.”
The trouble with this post and those others on the thread agreeing is the bias.
Last night they all got into each other's arguments, all of them.
The worst offender being Harry, the next worse, Chloe.
The one who got into others arguments least was Cristian, the next least, Danny. And you omit to mention that Danny tried a few times to give good advice based on walking away. Now, I know you'll say that's because he's trying to play the hero/dad/wise man or whatever other silly unfounded criticism you have for him, but it could be, it could just be that he's sick of listening to them screaming so he's trying to get them to be quiet.
Now I don't particularly like Danny but you can't expect anyone, other than another person with an irrational bias, to take this seriously.
Originally Posted by GrozzyGirl:
“The trouble with this post and those others on the thread agreeing is the bias.
Last night they all got into each other's arguments, all of them.
The worst offender being Harry, the next worse, Chloe.
The one who got into others arguments least was Cristian, the next least, Danny. And you omit to mention that Danny tried a few times to give good advice based on walking away. Now, I know you'll say that's because he's trying to play the hero/dad/wise man or whatever other silly unfounded criticism you have for him, but it could be, it could just be that he's sick of listening to them screaming so he's trying to get them to be quiet.
Now I don't particularly like Danny but you can't expect anyone, other than another person with an irrational bias, to take this seriously.”
“The trouble with this post and those others on the thread agreeing is the bias.
Last night they all got into each other's arguments, all of them.
The worst offender being Harry, the next worse, Chloe.
The one who got into others arguments least was Cristian, the next least, Danny. And you omit to mention that Danny tried a few times to give good advice based on walking away. Now, I know you'll say that's because he's trying to play the hero/dad/wise man or whatever other silly unfounded criticism you have for him, but it could be, it could just be that he's sick of listening to them screaming so he's trying to get them to be quiet.
Now I don't particularly like Danny but you can't expect anyone, other than another person with an irrational bias, to take this seriously.”
The voice of reason (again) Grozzy. But its 'lets slate everything Danny or Chloe and their families do' day on DS today I think. Like you I'm not a fan of either but a bit of perspective is always nice.
Can people not see the reason he gets involved in Jack , Chloe , Cristain arguments. It is because he is the appointed leader of their pack has been all series really. Or their 'daddy' which ever term you prefer. You'll notice they don't care when he gets involved , often he's actually telling them to back off for a bit as well. They clearly don't mind. All of this sticks out like a sore thumb.
Originally Posted by GrozzyGirl:
“The trouble with this post and those others on the thread agreeing is the bias.
Last night they all got into each other's arguments, all of them.
The worst offender being Harry, the next worse, Chloe.
The one who got into others arguments least was Cristian, the next least, Danny. And you omit to mention that Danny tried a few times to give good advice based on walking away. Now, I know you'll say that's because he's trying to play the hero/dad/wise man or whatever other silly unfounded criticism you have for him, but it could be, it could just be that he's sick of listening to them screaming so he's trying to get them to be quiet.
Now I don't particularly like Danny but you can't expect anyone, other than another person with an irrational bias, to take this seriously.”
“The trouble with this post and those others on the thread agreeing is the bias.
Last night they all got into each other's arguments, all of them.
The worst offender being Harry, the next worse, Chloe.
The one who got into others arguments least was Cristian, the next least, Danny. And you omit to mention that Danny tried a few times to give good advice based on walking away. Now, I know you'll say that's because he's trying to play the hero/dad/wise man or whatever other silly unfounded criticism you have for him, but it could be, it could just be that he's sick of listening to them screaming so he's trying to get them to be quiet.
Now I don't particularly like Danny but you can't expect anyone, other than another person with an irrational bias, to take this seriously.”
I;d say that it's perhaps you with the bias. You claim you don't like Danny and yet you totally dismiss the valid criticisms that are leveled at him and even go so far as to say that he tried to give 'good advice'?
Come on now. When it comes to thinking about others or giving good advice, Wisker's the most 'ungenuine' and least qualified out of the lot of them.
How people can defend a guy that's so quick to get aggressive and threaten violence is beyond me.
Originally Posted by Monkey Tennis:
“I;d say that it's perhaps you with the bias. You claim you don't like Danny and yet you totally dismiss the valid criticisms that are leveled at him and even go so far as to say that he tried to give 'good advice'?
Come on now. When it comes to thinking about others or giving good advice, Wisker's the most 'ungenuine' and least qualified out of the lot of them.
How people can defend a guy that's so quick to get aggressive and threaten violence is beyond me.”
“I;d say that it's perhaps you with the bias. You claim you don't like Danny and yet you totally dismiss the valid criticisms that are leveled at him and even go so far as to say that he tried to give 'good advice'?
Come on now. When it comes to thinking about others or giving good advice, Wisker's the most 'ungenuine' and least qualified out of the lot of them.
How people can defend a guy that's so quick to get aggressive and threaten violence is beyond me.”
I don't like him so I don't have bias. It's that simple.
I know you're irritated, because I'm making good points, but I cant help that.
It is good advice to tell people to cool down or leave a pointless argument that will only escalate and go nowhere, it is. Regardless of what motivations you choose to attribute to that advice. So you're inability to see that, is further evidence of your failure to be rational and reasonable about a lad on telly, who you don't know, will never know and affects your life by not one iota.
Youre exaggerating again saying he's quick to get aggressive and threaten violence. As if that's happening all the time and is a primary feature of his daily behaviour.
They've all lost their rags and got in each others faces at some point or another. But it's not that they've been doing it 15 times a day every day.
Originally Posted by linmic:
“The voice of reason (again) Grozzy. But its 'lets slate everything Danny or Chloe and their families do' day on DS today I think. Like you I'm not a fan of either but a bit of perspective is always nice.”
“The voice of reason (again) Grozzy. But its 'lets slate everything Danny or Chloe and their families do' day on DS today I think. Like you I'm not a fan of either but a bit of perspective is always nice.
”
I don't like either but I don't know what's got into people. Since Marc left a huge number of Marc supporters have decided it's Danny's fault Marc is a dick and are being completely unrealistic and plain lying about Danny, who's biggets short coming is that he's not as clever or cool as he thinks he is.
As for Chloe, well she's a madam but the obsession with her being a master manipulator from a criminal family ring is too ridiculous even for the Internet..
Originally Posted by GrozzyGirl:
“I don't like him so I don't have bias. It's that simple.
I know you're irritated, because I'm making good points, but I cant help that.
It is good advice to tell people to cool down or leave a pointless argument that will only escalate and go nowhere, it is. Regardless of what motivations you choose to attribute to that advice. So you're inability to see that, is further evidence of your failure to be rational and reasonable about a lad on telly, who you don't know, will never know and affects your life by not one iota.
Youre exaggerating again saying he's quick to get aggressive and threaten violence. As if that's happening all the time and is a primary feature of his daily behaviour.
They've all lost their rags and got in each others faces at some point or another. But it's not that they've been doing it 15 times a day every day.”
“I don't like him so I don't have bias. It's that simple.
I know you're irritated, because I'm making good points, but I cant help that.
It is good advice to tell people to cool down or leave a pointless argument that will only escalate and go nowhere, it is. Regardless of what motivations you choose to attribute to that advice. So you're inability to see that, is further evidence of your failure to be rational and reasonable about a lad on telly, who you don't know, will never know and affects your life by not one iota.
Youre exaggerating again saying he's quick to get aggressive and threaten violence. As if that's happening all the time and is a primary feature of his daily behaviour.
They've all lost their rags and got in each others faces at some point or another. But it's not that they've been doing it 15 times a day every day.”
You lose any semblance of a point you try to make when you resort to playground stuff like 'I know you're irritated, because I'm making good points'.
You excuse Danny for threats of violence as if they are nothing, and even go so far as to try and make out that all HM's are equally guilty of the same inexcusable behaviour (they clearly are not) which I think tells me all I need to know about your ability to try and be objective.
I'm not exaggerating in what i say- Perhaps you're just getting irritated because I'm making good points.
Originally Posted by Monkey Tennis:
“You lose any semblance of a point you try to make when you resort to playground stuff like 'I know you're irritated, because I'm making good points'.
You excuse Danny for threats of violence as if they are nothing, and even go so far as to try and make out that all HM's are equally guilty of the same inexcusable behaviour (they clearly are not) which I think tells me all I need to know about your ability to try and be objective.
I'm not exaggerating in what i say- Perhaps you're just getting irritated because I'm making good points.”
“You lose any semblance of a point you try to make when you resort to playground stuff like 'I know you're irritated, because I'm making good points'.
You excuse Danny for threats of violence as if they are nothing, and even go so far as to try and make out that all HM's are equally guilty of the same inexcusable behaviour (they clearly are not) which I think tells me all I need to know about your ability to try and be objective.
I'm not exaggerating in what i say- Perhaps you're just getting irritated because I'm making good points.
”
But I do know you're bothered because I'm making good points, it makes it very hard for you to challenge me because I am discussing without bias, using logic and being reasonable and you're not.
I haven't excused anyone for threatening violence , dont lie.
*whispers* Everyone can see it!
Originally Posted by qwerty_1234:
“I find him very mamipluative and ungenuine.”
“I find him very mamipluative and ungenuine.”
Lol.
Just another case of Big Daddy Danny sticking his beak where it don't belong in a failed effort to look good on camera as usual.
Originally Posted by GrozzyGirl:
“But I do know you're bothered because I'm making good pints, it makes it very hard for you to challenge me because I am discussing without bias, using logic and being reasonable and you're not.
I haven't excused anyone for threatening violence , dont lie.
*whispers* Everyone can see it!”
“But I do know you're bothered because I'm making good pints, it makes it very hard for you to challenge me because I am discussing without bias, using logic and being reasonable and you're not.
I haven't excused anyone for threatening violence , dont lie.
*whispers* Everyone can see it!”
Wrong yet again. You want to be careful or this could become a habit.
I can happily debate and make some pretty vocal points without for a second letting my actual emotions get involved.This is a reality tv show on channel 5, no more and no less- not life and death and I think sometimes people such as yourself forget that.
You did excuse Danny threatening violence by playing it down. dismissing my comment on it and then minimizing it by making out everyone the house loses their rag implying they are all as guilty as each other.
This is clearly not true, only one has threatened actual physical violence, and regularly lost the plot in violent outbursts (admittedly poor pizza boxes and ham sarnies often bear the brunt of it).
Now instead of accusing me of lying, and instead of trying to deflect using the same hackneyed playground tactics, perhaps take a step back and actually debate the point instead of throwing out your lazy accusations. You are clearly not debating with any semblance of logic and reason, despite your protests to the contrary.
Originally Posted by Monkey Tennis:
“Wrong yet again. You want to be careful or this could become a habit.
I can happily debate and make some pretty vocal points without for a second letting my actual emotions get involved.This is a reality tv show on channel 5, no more and no less- not life and death and I think sometimes people such as yourself forget that.
You did excuse Danny threatening violence by playing it down. dismissing my comment on it and then minimizing it by making out everyone the house loses their rag implying they are all as guilty as each other.
This is clearly not true, only one has threatened actual physical violence, and regularly lost the plot in violent outbursts (admittedly poor pizza boxes and ham sarnies often bear the brunt of it).
Now instead of accusing me of lying, and instead of trying to deflect using the same hackneyed playground tactics, perhaps take a step back and actually debate the point instead of throwing out your lazy accusations. You are clearly not debating with any semblance of logic and reason, despite your protests to the contrary.”
“Wrong yet again. You want to be careful or this could become a habit.
I can happily debate and make some pretty vocal points without for a second letting my actual emotions get involved.This is a reality tv show on channel 5, no more and no less- not life and death and I think sometimes people such as yourself forget that.
You did excuse Danny threatening violence by playing it down. dismissing my comment on it and then minimizing it by making out everyone the house loses their rag implying they are all as guilty as each other.
This is clearly not true, only one has threatened actual physical violence, and regularly lost the plot in violent outbursts (admittedly poor pizza boxes and ham sarnies often bear the brunt of it).
Now instead of accusing me of lying, and instead of trying to deflect using the same hackneyed playground tactics, perhaps take a step back and actually debate the point instead of throwing out your lazy accusations. You are clearly not debating with any semblance of logic and reason, despite your protests to the contrary.”
I did not excuse anyone's violent or threatening behaviour, stop lying.
That's good advice.
I've made my point initially , which you couldn't counter, so you lied.
This is a circle love.
1 of 2
