I hope this hasn't been brought up, but I can't see a thread that mentions it at all.

John M was going on and on about what wonderful person she is outside the house. She's kind to animals and has fostered kids. The first time he said she was involved with foster kids and then I believe he said she has fostered kids.

Some friends of mine had foster children and I can guarantee you if the Mrs had been an internet dominatrix, or either Mr or Mrs had been swearing and running around naked on a public telly show they WOULD NOT have been allowed to have foster children.

I also would think that with her 'issues' and the way she clearly can't deal with things, she wouldn't be able to participate in fostering.

If I've missed something I do apologise, but I'm still wondering what that's all about.

I have never liked Harry, but she's been true to herself. I just don't care for her and I think she and Nick are just as bad as each other.

I can't see her being a foster parent either. For one she is a bit young and two she is single (although of course that would not necessarily exclude her) and three her lifestyle and profession would probably go against her. McCririck talks bo***cks most of the time anyway. I wouldn't set much store by anything he says.

I got the impression it was animals she fostered, not kids, but I try not to listen to the stupid old man if I can help it, so I could be wrong.

I thought that's what he meant too for what it's worth.

She's not stable enough to be fostering human kids, surely?

That makes more sense...fostering animals. My mistake there if that is the case. I think I'm the same way with him - I dislike him intensely and listen to about 1/3 of what he actually says.

I actually don't think fostering animals makes an individual a good or bad person...unfortunately I've known of people who foster animals who have abused them horribly. Where I don't remotely suggest she's abusing animals I do say fostering them isn't an immediately earned halo.

he did say animals and kids mz i heard it too,

I'm a menopausal blonde! Now that it's been brought to my attention I'm with you guys as well!

I thought he did, but was doubting myself. I wonder if maybe he just said it in error.

Either way I just can't get into Harry.

This week I'd like Harry to go and Chloe to get massive boos.

Yes I'm a bit(h!!

Given the nature of her 'work' and her state of mind, she would not be allowed to foster kids. Also, would she be on BB if she did, because kids need stability. She has never mentioned any kids at all and her letter from home was from a friend. She has issues from the past, so it's not likely that she would be a foster parent.

He also said she looks after people with Disabilitys

Some of the most horrible, vindictive , vicious people around foster animals because they get on with them better and they don't get on with people. I'm sure on Harry's entry into BB there was something said about her involvement with animals but nothing about children.

It could be that her sister or "wife" is a foster carer and Harry helps out.

Maybe fosters baby goats...........kids!

Lol she's young, in a unique situation and doing well considering she's hating the experience with a lot of selfishness in there.

Oh and people who have or have had mental health issues can foster it is whether the child's need can be met or there is a significant risk. Many parents who blow their tops when drunk and argue don't automatically have their kids took of them.

Harry isn't even around animals let alone children.

Also people with mental health issues look after their kids. Again it's about whether there is a significant risk of physical or emotional harm to the child.

Many parents who have been on BB have come across has hostile individuals at times. They do no automatically have there kids taken off them. The context and editing of what is an entertainment show is important here.

Not sure why preferring animals to people makes someone horrible, vindictive and vicious ? There are lots of people that prefer animals to people, and sometimes I can't blame them looking at some of the specimans that call themselves humans these days.

I prefer animals to most people, hope I'm not considered vindictive and vicious

Definitely thought I heard John McCririck say she looked after stray animals, fostered children and cared for people with physical disabilities. He kept on saying that despite wtte that she was awful in the House, in the outside world she is a wonderful human being. I'm sure someone previously on BOTS referred to her having dogs and horses too.

Maybe she really is a wonderful human being in the outside world but, in my opinion at least, she is not coming across like that in the House.

Thats not what the op said, though. She is saying that some horrible people prefer animals to humans. Coincidentally, there was a programme on tv last night that showed an old poor bloke who lived with loads of cats. I felt sorry for him till he said he was an ex-gangster and he once shot a bloke through the face.

JM did say the fostered children which is BS.
It has to be remembered that the panel guests on BBOTS are paid and as such are there, for the most part, to do the producers bidding.
It is evident from some of the things they say they do not watch the programme.

Last night there was a lot of support for Chloe, both from the panel and audience, and it was even said that she was the least interested in the money.
If that doesn't prove what nonsense it all is, I don't know what does.

He said that she does charitable work with horses.

No he didn't.

We certainly differ in our opinions - I do not think she's doing well and as far as her situation, she's making it all by herself. Her actions are causing most/many of the reactions from other HMs that she gets.

I also never said that people who have mental health issues have their children taken away from them, but when placing foster children I do know that mental health and stability are seriously assessed. You are the only one speaking of children being taken from their parents - my intention was to speak my thoughts on her ability to have children placed with her.

Your comments about context and editing of a telly show aren't valid at all - not a soul has edited her out of her clothes and wandering a house full of strangers in front of hundreds of thousands of strangers...that's all down to her.

He definitely said she fostered children. He may have been mistaken but he definitely said it.

I listened to what he said and I cannot recall his saying that but we can easily check by listening again.

It is possible that if she had a a younger sibling then she chould have fostered a brother or sister. It happened to Alan Johnson M.P. His elder sister fostered him in their parental council house after their mother died. She was sixteen at the time.

Alan Johnson's sister, who saved him from being sent into foster care and is the heroine of his best-selling memoirs, cannot hide her pride in her younger brother. Linda Edwards, who was forced to fend for herself and her sibling from the tender age of 16 after the death of their mother, has been thrilled to watch him develop into a statesman despite the obstacles they were forced to overcome as children.

Maybe, wasn't a Rosie mentioned in her letter from home, Nick asked if it was her sister - it was.