Did anybody else feel like setting the streamers off when she said this during their argument at the end of last nights show?!

His sense of entitlement regarding nominations is the worst attitude I think I've seen in the history of Big Brother. Who is Jack to deem others reasons genuine or not?!

I'm glad she did this. The only other person to attempt it was Simon after he nominated Jack, was accused of giving a crap reason before Jack did exactly the same thing. But Simon kind of got ignored in the ongoing argument.

Hypocritical considering how many times she's flown off the handle when she doesn't approve of someone's reason for nominating. Besides he's far from the only one who can't deal with nominations...he's just an easy target. And of course he's up for eviction.

This.

This is what irks me about Jack. He thinks he is above being nominated and gets angry if people nominate him for not having genuine reasons (his words).
But what he fails to realise is they are genuine reasons, as its their opinions not his!

Want him out, he doesn't deserve to win.

ONCE she did that and that was Crisitan's nomination of Nick ...

You would have thought he was nominating Harry not Nick

In fairness it was more criticle of Harry than Nick, and her argumet was that he brought her into his nomination of someone else.

As for the hypocrite comments, she acknowledged and admitted that in her conversation with Nick last night. So at least she is honest about her issues unlike the rest of them. Step forward the fair and lovely Danny "I'll glass you in your face" Whisker

She had a right pop at Nick for his reason for nominating Marc...in fact she went on about it for ages. She had a rant to his face, then to the others in the bedroom and then went off to the diary room for one of her 'holier than thou' speeches.