A new housemate joins on Friday. (Can you imagine the HMs faces?!). Emma tells the housemate, that they will be evicting someone from the house...except it is fake and they are actually nominating someone to go into the final.

They enter the house, and BB says that the new housemate will have to EVICT someone immediately from the house. They pick - and the housemate leaves the house.

Emma talks to the 'evicted' housemate - but tells them this was fake. Also, the house is watching the 'eviction' on the big screen. But Emma, tells the housemate, they have a big timebomb on the new housemate:

1. Evict them and get £20,000 (of the fund) and re-enter the house OR
2. Let the new HM become a FINALIST and fund reduces by £20,000

What do you think? Why can't they come up with twists like this?

This would also completely change the dynamics in the house - and for the first time in BB history - a latecomer could end up WINNING!

My question, to you, is out of the two options which HMs would pick option 1? And which would pick Option 2?

??????