• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Humiliation of Jack
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
jack_blair
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by CheshireCatkin:
“Danny's obvious delight in Jack's humiliation was shameful. What next, feeding contestants to lions?”

Hope they do that next !
Jack would feed quite a few !
radders2012
14-07-2015
It wasn't so much the humiliation of Jack that anoyed me but the reaction of both Chloe and Danny, who, as other posters have said, seemed to revel in it. Chloe constantly digging at him - you've got 23 grand whats the problem, and Danny just plain tormenting him then running him down refering to a pie face melt down.

None of them seemed to grasp that, whet ever the reason this was happening he was going through it to add money to a prize fund he doesnt think he will win and they should have been supportive.
aggielane
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by Venetian:
“Would you have voted for him before he got all that camera time so close to the very end of the show? Genuine question.”

I would have voted for him if he had said no to all those tasks and eaten all the food.
sheils1
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by Susan_Phelan:
“It's not right
I really hope he wins it.”

They did it to Helen last year too, besides it has wiped the smug smile from Fat Jacks face aint it .
The Finisher
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by aurichie:
“He stole £23k of the other housemates money so he deserves to be humiliated.

Danny or Chloe ftw.”

At this point the only 'owner' of the money is BB and BB chose to offer him some of it. That is not defined as stealing in any context.
The Finisher
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by sheils1:
“They did it to Helen last year too, besides it has wiped the smug smile from Fat Jacks face aint it .”

I actually think that Jack got a really good edit last night and that he came out of it looking ok. I think it will get him votes.
getmadnow17
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by diesels hummin:
“Humiliation is the price he has to pay for his greedy opportunism.”

What's Chloe's price then? Her taking the money is worse in my opinion
Ocean Breeze
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by aurichie:
“He stole £23k of the other housemates money so he deserves to be humiliated.

Danny or Chloe ftw.”

By that reasoning, Chloe deserves to be humiliated too, I mean, she stole 5k after all.
Heartache
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by radders2012:
“It wasn't so much the humiliation of Jack that anoyed me but the reaction of both Chloe and Danny, who, as other posters have said, seemed to revel in it. Chloe constantly digging at him - you've got 23 grand whats the problem, and Danny just plain tormenting him then running him down refering to a pie face melt down.

None of them seemed to grasp that, whet ever the reason this was happening he was going through it to add money to a prize fund he doesnt think he will win and they should have been supportive.”

Just continues to underline Danny and Chloe's Hypocrisy about being part of a team blah, blah speak. Being part of a team means that you support, not add to any humiliation, and gleefully, spitefully enjoy that humiliation.
SH1965
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by Venetian:
“Would you have voted for him before he got all that camera time so close to the very end of the show? Genuine question.”

Maybe, yes. But I was still undecided until that point when Jack unselfishly rose to the challenges set to earn back money for the others whom took delight in ridiculing and making it worse for him, rather than helping and encouraging him. If I had been Jack no way would I have sat in those fish guts not had a strip taken out of my hair to earn extra for that spiteful, smug nasty lot. Chĺoe and Danny especially showed their true colours ans Jack proved he is very much a team player.

Totally agree with heartaches comments. I would love for Jack to now win and wipe the smug look off Chloes fat face and Danny's sceaming, sly smile.
kiyay
14-07-2015
You could make the argument that Jack's got more right to a portion of the prize fund than any of the others who've taken amounts from it as in the beginning he was voted for by the public to take the car, he could have taken it and walked leaving them all with nothing in the prize fund pot at all. He didn't and has had weeks to rethink that decision and seen others then go on to use the fund for their own ends

Joel £2500 for a pizza
Chloe and Sam taking £5000 cash
Nick taking £5000 to buy himself a place in the final

Any high moral ground was lost long ago. Christian would have taken the money but wasn't quick enough. Danny is playing an end game, he's conscious of how things look, of not looking bad, how many times has he said it, if he hadn't have gotten positive feedback from outside and negative reactions from the crowd would he too have gone for some of the prize fund by now, he was quick off the mark to throw his fellow housemates under the bus when it came to pressing the button to get to the final, the only one quicker Joel.

It makes me laugh how they all attempt to moralise over the others actions when there's not one of them left who haven't at one point or another shown they're in it first and foremost for themselves and why not it's a gameshow they went in to as individuals and generally speaking they only really behave like a team or a team player when it ultimately benefits them too..
jack_blair
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by Heartache:
“Just continues to underline Danny and Chloe's Hypocrisy about being part of a team blah, blah speak. Being part of a team means that you support, not add to any humiliation, and gleefully, spitefully enjoy that humiliation.”


I dont like Danny and Chloe but they ALL ran off when Jack was in the bath
They were having a laugh
I doubt he was there for long !
He was being pathetic and it was only smelly water..
He deserved to be left for kicking up such a fuss.

Jack found all the tasks funny when in DR !
. If he was OK and they all had a laugh for once , why look for drama and negativity.
SH1965
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by kiyay:
“You could make the argument that Jack's got more right to a portion of the prize fund than any of the others who've taken amounts form it as in the beginning he was voted for by the public to take the car, he could have taken it and walked leaving them all with nothing in the prize fund pot at all. He didn't and has had weeks to rethink that decision and seen others then go on to use the fund for their own ends

Joel £2500 for a pizza
Chloe and Sam taking £5000 cash
Nick taking £5000 to buy himself a place in the final

Any high moral ground was lost long ago. Christian would have taken the money but wasn't quick enough. Danny is playing an end game, he's conscious of how things look, of not looking bad, how many times has he said it, if he hadn't have gotten positive feedback from outside and negative reactions from the crowd would he too have gone for some of the prize fund by now, he was quick of the mark to throw his fellow housemates under the bus when it came to pressing the button to get to the final, the only one quicker Joel.

It makes me laugh how they all attempt to moralise over the others actions when there's not one of them left who haven't at one point or another shown they're in it first and foremost for themselves and why not it's a gameshow they went in to as individuals and generally speaking they only really behave like a team or a team player when it ultimately benefits them too..”

Yeah and they all coneniently seem to have forgotten. I will now vote for Jack whom seems the only genuine housemate left.
Dr Z
14-07-2015
The impression I'm getting is that BB want to encourage sympathy for Jack, they know Jack has a fan base as well as some hefty opposition - Marmite housemates are a Godsend to BB as they encourage heavy voting from both sides.

On another note, How bitter is Danny? Little spiteful digs to Jack every few minute, without a smile on his face, pouring the smelly stuff over his head s-l-o-w-l-y. I used to think he was OK but the more I see of him the more I think he's a sad little prick.
SH1965
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by jack_blair:
“
Jack found all the tasks funny when in DR !
. If he was OK and they all had a laugh for once , why look for drama and negativity.”

Hmm, big difference being they had a laugh at Jack's expense and were not laughing with him. I am 100% positive neither Joel, .Danny, Nick nor Chloe would have sat in those fish guts not had tbeir head shaved. Cristian may have though.

Negativity breeds negativity cant get more negative than Chloe nor Danny. Nasty, fakes
zx50
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by SH1965:
“Feeling very uncomfortable watching BB totally humiliate Jack making him the butt of jokes. Wouldn't feel happy if I were his family watching. Would love to see the smug smiles wiped off Danny and Chloe's face.”

Why? It's all part of the experience. If you go on the show, the chances are that you'll have to do some horrible things. Big Brother most likely asked him to do it because he was the one who took the money....which they said anyway.
Cornchips
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by yhtrownu:
“The humiliation of Jack was orchestrated to make him popular. This was Big Brother's ploy to put him back in contention for the main prize.

They know exactly what they are doing! 😊”

Agreed.
Linus2
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by SH1965:
“Hmm, big difference being they had a laugh at Jack's expense and were not laughing with him. I am 100% positive neither Joel, .Danny, Nick nor Chloe would have sat in those fish guts not had tbeir head shaved. Cristian may have though.

Negativity breeds negativity cant get more negative than Chloe nor Danny. Nasty, fakes”

You being 100% positive about something doesn“t make it a fact. They were all having a laugh, jeezz. It looked like normal banter between guys to me. What is the problem with Jack having to "earn" that money and doing some stupid tasks that many housemates in many seasons had to do to? My guess is you just try to make Danny and Chloe look bad.
jack_blair
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by Linus2:
“You being 100% positive about something doesn“t make it a fact. They were all having a laugh, jeezz. It looked like normal banter between guys to me. What is the problem with Jack having to "earn" that money and doing some stupid tasks that many housemates in many seasons had to do to? My guess is you just try to make Danny and Chloe look bad.”

I agree
I think they're all seethingly jealous about the money,
But in Jack's tasks ,, i think they all found it funny but not in a malicious way.
Eve Elle
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by Dr Z:
“I think he's a sad little prick.”

And you wouldn't be alone in thinking that.
zx50
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by radders2012:
“It wasn't so much the humiliation of Jack that anoyed me but the reaction of both Chloe and Danny, who, as other posters have said, seemed to revel in it. Chloe constantly digging at him - you've got 23 grand whats the problem, and Danny just plain tormenting him then running him down refering to a pie face melt down.

None of them seemed to grasp that, whet ever the reason this was happening he was going through it to add money to a prize fund he doesnt think he will win and they should have been supportive.”

Which shows, despite their lies, that they begrudge Jack the £23,900 that he won. IF Chloe gets expensive things bought for her by her boyfriend, I don't know why she's that bothered for. I noticed Danny trying to mock Jack when he was getting a spray tan. Don't like Danny at all.
zx50
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by yhtrownu:
“The humiliation of Jack was orchestrated to make him popular. This was Big Brother's ploy to put him back in contention for the main prize.

They know exactly what they are doing! 😊”

I can see that being the reason as well. It'll be to try and make the viewers think that Jack is actually a team player. I would like to know why Channel 5 want him as the winner though.
jack_blair
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by sutie:
“I don't think they'd have done that to anyone else. The producers are sadists.”

Originally Posted by yhtrownu:
“The humiliation of Jack was orchestrated to make him popular. This was Big Brother's ploy to put him back in contention for the main prize.

They know exactly what they are doing! 😊”

Its simple
Whoever won the £23900 was going to have to do the tasks to earn it and put money back into the pot. Whoever it was was going to get airtime and the others airtime of their reaction to a HM doing the tasks.

Jacks less likeky to win and he knows it., he took that gamble, and his track record of gambling doesn't seem great, .so if he was going to win before , he'll now never know -

he's a bit of a fool because he may have won had he not taken the money.

It will be between Joel Danny and Cristian for the win, sadly.
sherisgirl
14-07-2015
Why was it uncomfortable viewing?????????????
It is nothing BB has not done before over the years,
Spraying tanning continously was a recent one, and shaving a strip on the head was also done before, but then BB fans of old will already know this
Instead of the Humililation bandwagon coming out, a wonder no one has mentioned the bullying word yet.
getmadnow17
14-07-2015
Originally Posted by zx50:
“Why? It's all part of the experience. If you go on the show, the chances are that you'll have to do some horrible things. Big Brother most likely asked him to do it because he was the one who took the money....which they said anyway.”

It isn't fair because Chloe and Jack have committed the same crime but only Jack is being punished. Chloe should have been forced to take part in the tasks too.
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map