Chloe: Because you stole the money!

2 of 2

JanisElizabeth

14-07-2015

Originally Posted by B L Zeebub:
“BIB - No, they didn't. Joel thought it would, but Chloe, and others, didn't and had objected to it being frittered away.

Yes, Chloe and others (we don't know how many) lost money by talking during the noms task, but that was not deliberate like Joel and Jack's attempts to spend it.”

And yet she took £5k of it

B L Zeebub

14-07-2015

Originally Posted by JanisElizabeth:
“And yet she took £5k of it ”

You do understand that that was £5000 cash, not two small frozen pizzas, yes?

The_Bonobo

14-07-2015

Originally Posted by B L Zeebub:
“You do understand that that was £5000 cash, not two small frozen pizzas, yes?”

The suitcase thing was the kicker for me. That happened the previous night I believe and involved people wanting to spend a whole £100 for something with obvious value to them at the time. The fact she then took the 5k is fine but she should have just admitted she was being hypocritical.

Just admitting it but saying she still can't refuse it (maybe even that she regrets going on her high horse so much previously) would have nullified much of the criticism. Instead she tried to make them feel bad and now keeps on with it. Even fabricating that Jack had a major go at her when that is simply not true.

B L Zeebub

14-07-2015

Originally Posted by The_Bonobo:
“The suitcase thing was the kicker for me. That happened the previous night I believe and involved people wanting to spend a whole £100 for something with obvious value to them at the time. The fact she then took the 5k is fine but she should have just admitted she was being hypocritical.

Just admitting it but saying she still can't refuse it (maybe even that she regrets going on her high horse so much previously) would have nullified much of the criticism. Instead she tried to make them feel bad and now keeps on with it. Even fabricating that Jack had a major go at her when that is simply not true.”

She said that Jack had a go at her about it and he agreed that he had.

Yes, she took it from the winner, yes, she banged on about not doing that, but I do think it was the fact that it was being wasted which got her goat, and that doesn't necessarily make her a hypocrite.

Scarlett Berry

14-07-2015

Originally Posted by B L Zeebub:
“She said that Jack had a go at her about it and he agreed that he had.

Yes, she took it from the winner, yes, she banged on about not doing that, but I do think it was the fact that it was being wasted which got her goat, and that doesn't necessarily make her a hypocrite.”

She's a hypocrite. Dress it up or down, it's irrefutable.

fifitrixibelle

14-07-2015

Originally Posted by B L Zeebub:
“You do understand that that was £5000 cash, not two small frozen pizzas, yes?”

You do understand that she had been yapping on and on all week that the money should go to the prize fund for the winner...which bit of I'll pocket £5k did I miss from her?............frankly splitting hairs about how he money (taken away from the prize fund which was Ms Sanctimonious' regurgitating theme all week) is a cop out from her and her fan's, the principle is the same and I don't give a fig if it was for a pizza or towards a great bg gypsy meringue wedding frock..she took the money she stated should go toward the prize fund and when called out on her hypocrisy wheeled out the water works to avoid the obvious and blathered on how she expected other's should be 'happy' for her.

pugamo

14-07-2015

She is literally unbelievable. When she was huffing that everyone was happy for Jack and asking him how he'd spend his money I couldn't believe my ears.

The_Bonobo

14-07-2015

Originally Posted by B L Zeebub:
“She said that Jack had a go at her about it and he agreed that he had.

Yes, she took it from the winner, yes, she banged on about not doing that, but I do think it was the fact that it was being wasted which got her goat, and that doesn't necessarily make her a hypocrite.”

We saw the bit with Jack and all he did was say in surprise "is it a bit contradictory" and when she got more uptight he pulled back. He also did not agree. He was saying that he was just surprised. The only reason it was not clearer was because he seems to love her so much that he avoids even the slightest confrontation. She, however, had several goes at him over the entire week and is still doing it.

The BIB is all you need to conclude it was hypocrisy. The rest is only useful if you want to say what she did was not that big a deal. The bit you have written is roughly a definition of hypocrisy.

2 of 2