DS Forums

 
 

Joel educating Danny


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15-07-2015, 22:13
Tonya69
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 102

If I was D*nny I would be pretty embarrassed being educated by a 19 year old about stuff that should have sunk in at school. Although Joel was incorrect about the Queen having to approve laws, that hasn't been around for a long time.

I think New York might have something to say about London supposedly being the finance capital of the world too.

The thing is, with this years housemates you can pretty much claim anything without much argument or correction.
Tonya69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 15-07-2015, 22:17
Pitman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London
Posts: 16,529
you could tell Danny that Gandhi was the British canoeing champion and he'd believe you
Pitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:20
Tonya69
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 102
you could tell Danny that Gandhi was the British canoeing champion and he'd believe you
Well, if he googled it he wouldn't get much joy. Imagine his reaction when Google says "did you mean c a n o e?"
Tonya69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:28
Pitman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London
Posts: 16,529
Well, if he googled it he wouldn't get much joy. Imagine his reaction when Google says "did you mean c a n o e?"
the way he spells it I think he'd more likely get the congo
Pitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:35
Amelia_Sutherla
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,139
If I was D*nny I would be pretty embarrassed being educated by a 19 year old about stuff that should have sunk in at school. Although Joel was incorrect about the Queen having to approve laws, that hasn't been around for a long time.

I think New York might have something to say about London supposedly being the finance capital of the world too.

The thing is, with this years housemates you can pretty much claim anything without much argument or correction.
Joel obviously believes all the shit his beloved leader spouts,a typical Tory boy full of his own importance.
Amelia_Sutherla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:36
Tonya69
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 102
the way he spells it I think he'd more likely get the congo
....which he would think was that dance they did in the garden the other day.
Tonya69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:37
whoyouarexo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: In front of t'tele
Posts: 5,958
I think it's quite nice actually! Danny's said before that he's learnt loads off of Joel and it's better then watching loads of bitching and sniping!
whoyouarexo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:39
Dave_62
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,167
Joel talking doesn't mean he was educating danny.

4th richest country in the world? Own loads of islands?

Both as thick as each other, only danny might admit it.
Dave_62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:40
Tonya69
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 102
Joel obviously believes all the shit his beloved leader spouts,a typical Tory boy full of his own importance.
I agree. It's like he's admired all the negative points associated with the Tories. If he acted like that in my old school he would have been very lonely. He even adopts politicians mannerisms and ways of answering questions. I've never reacted well to pompous types with arrogance and superiority complexes. Even his face is snobby, it's like someone has put a turd under his nose.
Tonya69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:41
Pitman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London
Posts: 16,529
Joel talking doesn't mean he was educating danny.

4th richest country in the world? Own loads of islands?

Both as thick as each other, only danny might admit it.
it's like the blind leading the tub of lard
Pitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:44
Tonya69
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 102
Joel talking doesn't mean he was educating danny.

4th richest country in the world? Own loads of islands?

Both as thick as each other, only danny might admit it.
Actually Joel does get most things right...annoyingly. Britain does have a lot of islands too. I think he meant in terms of ex commonwealth and governance.

He clearly isn't emotionally intelligent though, or even aware of sexuality issues. Typical politician really.
Tonya69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:44
Stuart25
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 11,807
I'm pretty sure the Queen does have to approve laws - either she rarely does, or rarely objects, though. (Correct me if I'm wrong)
Stuart25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:45
Robbie_Craig
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 588
Joel educating Danny typical tory got it wrong
London is not the financial capitol of the world New York or Tokyo more like
We did not conquer the Falklands nor do we OWN lot's of islands
And as for the constitutional monarchy well nearly right unfortunatly we have a heredity monarchy but no written constitution .
Robbie_Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:47
BabelBrook
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,239
If I was D*nny I would be pretty embarrassed being educated by a 19 year old about stuff that should have sunk in at school. Although Joel was incorrect about the Queen having to approve laws, that hasn't been around for a long time.

I think New York might have something to say about London supposedly being the finance capital of the world too.

The thing is, with this years housemates you can pretty much claim anything without much argument or correction.
Technically he was correct as royal assent is required even if it is pretty much a formality.
BabelBrook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:47
Dave_62
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,167
I'm pretty sure the Queen does have to approve laws - either she rarely does, or rarely objects, though. (Correct me if I'm wrong)
Spot on. Considering Joel is an aspiring politician, that level of ignorance is embarrassing.

He shown himself to be proper thick, nice accent but ignorant as Danny.
Dave_62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:49
Tonya69
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 102
I'm pretty sure the Queen does have to approve laws - either she rarely does, or rarely objects, though. (Correct me if I'm wrong)
No, the queen is a figurehead by nomenclature. She has nothing to do with laws, she can raise an objection but she wields no power.
Tonya69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:50
Dave_62
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,167
No, the queen is a figurehead by nomenclature. She has nothing to do with laws, she can raise an objection but she wields no power.
All laws need royal ascent. It's just a fact, sorry.
Dave_62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:54
Tonya69
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 102
All laws need royal ascent. It's just a fact, sorry.
No, it doesn't need royal assent. Amendments don't even go past her and she has no effect on any laws. Look at the furore with Charles trying to pipe up, the objection is that he is the future king and can't get involved. The queen is more in line with an ambassador.
Tonya69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:54
loco_loca
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 636
If I was D*nny I would be pretty embarrassed being educated by a 19 year old about stuff that should have sunk in at school. Although Joel was incorrect about the Queen having to approve laws, that hasn't been around for a long time.

I think New York might have something to say about London supposedly being the finance capital of the world too.

The thing is, with this years housemates you can pretty much claim anything without much argument or correction.
He's not incorrect. New laws need the Royal assent. An argument can be made for London being the financial capital of the world: NY and London are pretty much neck and neck at the moment, but London has consistency/history.
loco_loca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:56
Dave_62
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,167
No, it doesn't need royal assent. Amendments don't even go past her and she has no effect on any laws. Look at the furore with Charles trying to pipe up, the objection is that he is the future king and can't get involved. The queen is more in line with an ambassador.
An amendment is not a law, its an amendment to an existing law, the law does not change. It remains assented..

All laws need royal assent.

Joel should know this. Intelligent aspiring politician? Its basic.
Dave_62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 22:57
BabelBrook
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,239
No, it doesn't need royal assent. Amendments don't even go past her and she has no effect on any laws. Look at the furore with Charles trying to pipe up, the objection is that he is the future king and can't get involved. The queen is more in line with an ambassador.
Charles and representations to ministers is irrelevant. All Acts of Parliament require royal assent which under the constitutional monachy could be withheld (although it is unlikely it would happen).
BabelBrook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 23:00
Mrs Simpson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 159
Charles and representations to ministers is irrelevant. All Acts of Parliament require royal assent which under the constitutional monachy could be withheld (although it is unlikely it would happen).
But wasn't Joel talking about laws in the colonies (all those "islands" Britain "owns")? In which case, I don't think that they do have to have Royal Assent, although for some colonies I think that the UK remains the highest court of appeal.
Mrs Simpson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 23:00
Verence
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kessingland, Suffolk
Posts: 85,566
Charles and representations to ministers is irrelevant. All Acts of Parliament require royal assent which under the constitutional monachy could be withheld (although it is unlikely it would happen).
The last time a monarch refused Royal Assent was in 1708 in the reign of Queen Anne
Verence is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 23:00
docman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,760
He's not incorrect. New laws need the Royal assent. An argument can be made for London being the financial capital of the world: NY and London are pretty much neck and neck at the moment, but London has consistency/history.
Quite. The Queen is legally in her right to refuse to do so and then a law would not be enforceable. It is just convention that she does not exercise this right.
docman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-07-2015, 23:01
benbeez1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 11,976
why did Joel waste his time ?
benbeez1 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:55.