Originally Posted by muggins14:
“Fascinating how it helped the police, I meant.
Of course I feel compassion for the victims - it's rather unnecessary of you to suggest otherwise - which is why we were all glad that the perpetrators were caught. You aren't telling me you didn't read about the whole case in the press at all, that you don't follow the news when a tragedy unfolds? I've watched documentaries about 9/11 every time they are on, not out of bloodthirst but because I do have compassion for those who lost their lives so tragically and needlessly, because I feel it's something we should never forget. (ETA: as are many tragic events in our history, of course)
rhizo - I have glanced at Live Leaks, it's not for me thanks.”
I never suggested that you didn't feel compassion, muggins, I asked you what you recall of the event. I'm attempting to demonstrate how people often remember their own experience of the news (which is 100% irrelevant) more than the events themselves. And of course I followed the story and its aftermath, but not on Twitter. Watching in-depth documentaries about historical events is the opposite of Twitter, and entirely commendable.
What I'm saying is that the news is not a spectator sport to be enjoyed in the moment and then forgotten, as is fostered by Twitter. It should provoke empathy and inform your world view, not provide temporary entertainment that overshadows the reality of the situation. When you see footage of a guided missile strike you're not watching a film, you're likely watching real people's lives coming to a grisly end. I'm not talking about YOU though. This isn't about you at all.