• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Stephanie Davis axed from Hollyoaks
<<
<
2 of 9
>>
>
sderr123
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by actual_soap:
“Hopefully Scott follows though”

Well actors who've got contracts and haven't done anything to get fired won't be because of Steph Davis. I mean you've got to honor those. They'll have to to rewrite storylines and we'll see what happens to Diane and Scott at the end of their current contracts.
Matt35
16-07-2015
So how long will she be onscreen for?
Collybird
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by Matt35:
“So how long will she be onscreen for?”

I think they film around 6 weeks ahead but I imagine there'll be a lot of re-writes going on so she may disappear sooner.
attitude99
16-07-2015
I'm guessing Kirkwood was the one who dropped her.
LHolmes
16-07-2015
I think if it's time keeping then they should at least let her film an exit. For there not to be an exit it should be something serious.

Kirkwood had it in for Devon Anderson as he was also quick to sack him at EastEnders.
Bluebird69
16-07-2015
Much as I feel sympathy for anybody losing their job, I can't deny that I'm very glad that this horrible character will soon be gone from the show

Now, if only they could give Freddie, Lindsay, Robbie, Sienna and her mini-me, plus all the Lomaxes their marching orders. And Kirkwood too, of course That would be a good start on reversing the current diabolical state of HOs.
srhgts
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by LHolmes:
“I think if it's time keeping then they should at least let her film an exit. For there not to be an exit it should be something serious.”

Agree.
gilesb
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by Collybird:
“Sad to see this. I don't like Sinead but I loved Stephanie on Over The Rainbow. I was so excited when she joined the cast and it's a real shame it's come to this.

Hollyoaks never seem to shy away from terminating contracts with immediate effect. It seems to happen more often there than in the other soaps, probably due to the age of the cast!?”

Who else has had an "immediate effect" termination?
seventhwave
16-07-2015
I agree that while Sinead's a pretty awful character, Stephanie Davis is talented and losing her is a shame

I hope that means that we'll see the back of Scott soon. I mean no disrespect to Ross Adams (and it'll be a shame if this means that he can't be on the show as long as he'd hoped) but Scott is truly awful, I'm afraid

Originally Posted by gilesb:
“Who else has had an "immediate effect" termination?”

As previously mentioned, Devon Anderson (original Sonny) got one, with the official reason given that he was always late to work. A while back there was a student character called Bella, IIRC? who just vanished with no exit written for her, can't recall if she got an instant termination too?
Sez_babe
16-07-2015
Surely when it's timekeeping issues, the actors were given exit scenes?
Collybird
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by gilesb:
“Who else has had an "immediate effect" termination?”

Devon Anderson and David Judge.
sderr123
16-07-2015
For them to make an announcement that her contract wasn't renewed suddenly like that it must have been for cause. Think of how many people HO loses or kills off. I don't think we've seen a press release like that before have we?
kitkat1971
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by eastiesfan2012:
“Hollyoaks star Stephanie Davis has been dropped from the soap, Digital Spy can reveal.

The actress will not be filming any further scenes in her role as Sinead Roscoe after show bosses decided to terminate her contract.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/s1...mpaign=twitter”

Very surprised at this, i thought they saw her as one of their main stars and to be fair, though i hate Sinead with a passion, Davis is a good actress.

It does make you wonder if it has something to do with real life events, it isn't that her work isn't up to scratch or they've run out of plotline for Sinead but she has done something which constitutes Gross Misconduct so they had no choice but to dismiss her with immediate affect.
gilesb
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by Collybird:
“Devon Anderson and David Judge.”

Hmmm, but they didn't seem quite as brutal as this termination appears to have been.

I wonder if they just want to make a show to the rest of the cast that no-one is untouchable.

Nothing controversial on her twitter/instagram so must be something else.

She did once describe herself as the Lindsay Lohan of the Hollyoaks cast.
sderr123
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by seventhwave:
“I agree that while Sinead's a pretty awful character, Stephanie Davis is talented and losing her is a shame

I hope that means that we'll see the back of Scott soon. I mean no disrespect to Ross Adams (and it'll be a shame if this means that he can't be on the show as long as he'd hoped) but Scott is truly awful, I'm afraid”

I agree Scott's pretty bad, but it would be all down Ross' contract terms. I would guess a termination of another actor wouldn't effect his contract.
Bluebird69
16-07-2015
Why do some people think it's because of timekeeping issues?

I have no idea what's gone on, but to be axed so abruptly suggests to me that it must have been some pretty serious disciplinary issue. If it was due to timekeeping, it must have been persistent and unresolved if they chose to take this course of action - it's not as if Steph was in a minor role, I'm sure they wouldn't have got rid of her if it could have been avoided.
kitkat1971
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by Harlowe:
“Wow a bit shocking to just axe her like that must of been serious, she was only filming the other day!

Whatever happened, it stupid to just axe her with no proper exit, Sinead is may not be everyone flavour of the month but she been there a long time.”

If it is Gross Misconduct they wouldn't have a choice as to whether they could keep her on set long enough to film exit scenes.

If, hypothetically (this is hypothetical, not slander, i have no idea of the circumstances so not suggesting this actually happened) she committed a violent act against another member of staff then she could not be allowed to stay on or return to the premises, even to film final scenes.
Collybird
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by gilesb:
“Hmmm, but they didn't seem quite as brutal as this termination appears to have been.

I wonder if they just want to make a show to the rest of the cast that no-one is untouchable.

Nothing controversial on her twitter/instagram so must be something else.

She did once describe herself as the Lindsay Lohan of the Hollyoaks cast.”

I think it just seems more brutal as Sinead is one of the golden girls of the show.

Devon Anderson's departure seemed quite a big deal to me as at the time the Valentine's were a big part of the show, he was linked to golden boy Justin and the royal family the McQueens.

Judge definitely didn't seem so brutal as he was very much a bit part player.
Aura101
16-07-2015
Perhaps she annoyed Bryan Birkwood . Hell hath no fury like a birkwood scorned .
Can they sack her for refusing to carry out a storyline put to her ?
Matt35
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by Bluebird69:
“Why do some people think it's because of timekeeping issues?

I have no idea what's gone on, but to be axed so abruptly suggests to me that it must have been some pretty serious disciplinary issue. If it was due to timekeeping, it must have been persistent and unresolved if they chose to take this course of action - it's not as if Steph was in a minor role, I'm sure they wouldn't have got rid of her if it could have been avoided.”

Can't see it being just for timekeeping. Must be something way more serious.
fairyfruitcake
16-07-2015
Firstly bad timekeeping is a very serious offence for an actor. If an actor is late it holds the whole shoot up and you have cast and crew waiting around doing nothing. It puts the schedule out and costs the company a great deal of money. I'm not sorry she's going I found her difficult to watch and in my opinon she isnt very good. As she has been sacked without a planned exit it will be something very serious. I'm not going to speculate because that would be unfair but I would take bets on it not being timekeeping alone. Silly girl, that's her opportunity wasted and career down the drain
Collybird
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by Bluebird69:
“Why do some people think it's because of timekeeping issues?

I have no idea what's gone on, but to be axed so abruptly suggests to me that it must have been some pretty serious disciplinary issue. If it was due to timekeeping, it must have been persistent and unresolved if they chose to take this course of action - it's not as if Steph was in a minor role, I'm sure they wouldn't have got rid of her if it could have been avoided.”

Timekeeping is being suggested as there's been a precedent in the past.

It's also much less slanderous a suggestion than various other reasons she may have been sacked for!
kitkat1971
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by Collybird:
“Sad to see this. I don't like Sinead but I loved Stephanie on Over The Rainbow. I was so excited when she joined the cast and it's a real shame it's come to this.

Hollyoaks never seem to shy away from terminating contracts with immediate effect. It seems to happen more often there than in the other soaps, probably due to the age of the cast!?”

Possibly. Older actors have had more experience to know what is and isn't acceptable re working practise? Also, perhaps less likely to let the fame go to their heads and assume they're too important to the show to axe and of course less likely to be out clubbing it every night to get into compromising situations (bringing ths show into disrepite) or be hungover at or late into work etc.
fairyfruitcake
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by sderr123:
“I agree Scott's pretty bad, but it would be all down Ross' contract terms. I would guess a termination of another actor wouldn't effect his contract.”

No it wouldnt but generally the guaranteed episodes are very low so he could be worse off financially if they feel they have tied him in too tight with Sinead or he could be substantially better off if they decide to use him instead of Sinead
kitkat1971
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by fairyfruitcake:
“Firstly bad timekeeping is a very serious offence for an actor. If an actor is late it holds the whole shoot up and you have cast and crew waiting around doing nothing. It puts the schedule out and costs the company a great deal of money. I'm not sorry she's going I found her difficult to watch and in my opinon she isnt very good. As she has been sacked without a planned exit it will be something very serious. I'm not going to speculate because that would be unfair but I would take bets on it not being timekeeping alone. Silly girl, that's her opportunity wasted and career down the drain”

Very true re timekeeping and also things like being hungover so forgetting your lines. It's not like an office job where a person is often quite self sufficient so can just stay late or work through lunch to make up their hours and finish their work or get a colleague to cover for them for half an hour. It disrupts dozens of people and costs money, they can't just film something else instead as the necessary actors might not be available of they won't have the sets ready.
<<
<
2 of 9
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map