• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
3 terrible winners in a row.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
connor the judg
16-07-2015
It's the 3rd time where my least favourite on the final night has won.
mmpfb
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by connor the judg:
“It's the 3rd time where my least favourite on the final night has won. ”

Could have been worse. Could have been Joel.
connor the judg
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by mmpfb:
“Could have been worse. Could have been Joel.”

That would of been great.
henryscat
16-07-2015
When the format was nice, we got nice winners.

Now the format is like a 3 month episode of Jeremy Kyle, we get scum winners.

The viewers have changed, so so have the results.
GazzaBB
16-07-2015
Definitely. The people who vote on this show must be really, really special.
*~TeePee~*
16-07-2015
Sam Evans was great!
connor the judg
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by GazzaBB:
“Definitely. The people who vote on this show must be really, really special.”

"special"?
SegaGamer
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by *~TeePee~*:
“Sam Evans was great!”

I agree, i wanted him to win. I loved it when he won, he only had about 20 fans on here
sivle77
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by *~TeePee~*:
“Sam Evans was great!”

cant even remember her. who was she?
ShadowTillNow
16-07-2015
It's disheartening to think that there were at least 4 other people that could have made a worse winner than Chloe! Joel, Cristian, Danny, Jack... awful result, but Chloe was probably the best of a bad lot.

Helen was awful, no doubt about it, but I didn't mind her winning because she was at least the biggest talking point of the series. Did people even know Chloe's name until this week?
Captain Kipper
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by mmpfb:
“Could have been worse. Could have been Joel.”

Then it still would have been only two bad winners in a row.
SnowStorm86
16-07-2015
Originally Posted by sivle77:
“cant even remember her. who was she?”

Deaf lad. Welsh. Liked to talk about his winkle.

People complained that he was boring but I thought he was alright.
Vicky8675309
17-07-2015
I forgot about the 3
I wanted Joel, Ashleigh, and Dexter to win their respective years. If not Dexter then Gina…at least they entertained me unlike that houseplant
Lou17
17-07-2015
Originally Posted by henryscat:
“When the format was nice, we got nice winners.

Now the format is like a 3 month episode of Jeremy Kyle, we get scum winners.

The viewers have changed, so so have the results.”

When the series were fun/entertaining we got decent winners

Now we have undeserving winners that you'll forget in a few days.

Who was the winner before Helen????

Ive genuinely forgotten.

To be honest each series gets worse and worse not only the very fitting winners that accompany them.
Lou17
17-07-2015
Originally Posted by GazzaBB:
“Definitely. The people who vote on this show must be really, really special.”

I think its older mums who simply now take bb at face value and are easily spoon fed who ever bb wants as a winner etc

And a much younger 'tween audience that wants a more towie type winner/series.
John_Lochery
17-07-2015
would rather joel or even cristian won tbh. but thinking about it I don't think Ive actually liked a winner since Josie won the last ch4 series in 2010
hendoll
17-07-2015
Time to put BB down. If it was a horse or a dog it would be long gone, let's be honest.
dd68
17-07-2015
It's still the person with the most votes that wins
QuiteInterested
17-07-2015
Originally Posted by Lou17:
“I think its older mums who simply now take bb at face value and are easily spoon fed who ever bb wants as a winner etc
”

*ahem* Not this older mum, thank you!
orangeballoon
17-07-2015
chloe was great...

and he "highlights" were far better than joels... sort of shows she was as nice as virtually every evictie said she was
peter_smith7
17-07-2015
I didn't want Chloe to win but I did have a bet on her so im happy enough. It would have been worse if Danny or Joel had won it.
Dr Z
17-07-2015
Originally Posted by Lou17:
“I think its older mums who simply now take bb at face value and are easily spoon fed who ever bb wants as a winner etc

And a much younger 'tween audience that wants a more towie type winner/series.”


I think this is a common misconception that BB 'wants' someone as a winner - Yes, BB will manipulate throughout the the whole process, but its nothing to do with making anyone the winner, its all about putting the housemates that will encourage the most voting for (and against).

Screwed around with as it is, I genuinely don't think BB gives a toss about who wins.
bellyyellow
17-07-2015
dr Z i like that view.
Fudd
17-07-2015
Originally Posted by orangeballoon:
“chloe was great...

and he "highlights" were far better than joels... sort of shows she was as nice as virtually every evictie said she was”

Oh please. The highlights farce of last night was an awfully produced cherry on top of the awfully produced cake which is BB15. The likes of Joel, Jack, heck even the other three, did far more than was shown whereas Chloe's had all and sundry thrown into it.
Jennyloo
17-07-2015
Originally Posted by henryscat:
“When the format was nice, we got nice winners.

Now the format is like a 3 month episode of Jeremy Kyle, we get scum winners.

The viewers have changed, so so have the results.”

Yes your so right. Remind me again anyone, who won year before last.?
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map