DS Forums

 
 

Emma still not getting why Chloe got stick about the £5k.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16-07-2015, 22:36
Captain Kipper
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 9,192

Is Willis playing stupid or is she really that thick?

She still harps on about Chloe getting stick for taking the £5k and Jack not getting any comeback for taking his cash (apart from Chloe's constant jibes at him of course)...if Emma cant see the clear difference then she is a dumbass.
Captain Kipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 16-07-2015, 23:01
nattoyaki
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,709
Just on SOTS saying what a lovely normal girl she is (yet again).

Yes we get what you think (or have been told to think) by now Willis...

I've said it elsewhere but I really don't think she can be watching anymore
nattoyaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:08
U96
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,234
Just on SOTS saying what a lovely normal girl she is (yet again).

Yes we get what you think (or have been told to think) by now Willis...

I've said it elsewhere but I really don't think she can be watching anymore
She' is too busy with other tv work now.They should give the job to Rylan.
U96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:10
Flowes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,773
Is Willis playing stupid or is she really that thick?

She still harps on about Chloe getting stick for taking the £5k and Jack not getting any comeback for taking his cash (apart from Chloe's constant jibes at him of course)...if Emma cant see the clear difference then she is a dumbass.
She gets it, she has to follow the script. BB pays her wages
Flowes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:11
SegaGamer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
I think she does get it, how can anybody not get it ? I think she just wants to make it seem like Chloe is perfect and can do no wrong.
SegaGamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:11
Captain Kipper
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 9,192
She gets it, she has to follow the script. BB pays her wages
Maybe thats why she's leaving...theres hope for her yet if she gets out.
Captain Kipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:14
lee_mccleary
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 636
Chloe taking the 5000 was justified.
lee_mccleary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:19
Captain Kipper
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 9,192
Chloe taking the 5000 was justified.
But still made her a hypocrite, and thats why she got some stick over her decision.
Captain Kipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:19
Alrightmate
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,752
Chloe taking the 5000 was justified.
But not by Chloe's own criteria for what is justified or not.
Alrightmate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:22
Flowes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,773
Maybe thats why she's leaving...theres hope for her yet if she gets out.
I hope so. I've always liked her but she will do far better getting out.
Flowes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:22
ChipDouglas82
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Douglas Towers
Posts: 2,614
Perhaps because Emma & BOTS are judging her fairly, rather than most here who can't get past their dislike for Chloe.
ChipDouglas82 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:23
Darcyprincess
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 22,673
But still made her a hypocrite, and thats why she got some stick over her decision.
Yes Chloe was a hypocrite for taking the money when she made such a fuss about everybody else!
Darcyprincess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:23
nanna7
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,726
I think I watched a different show than the people on bbots just don't see what Chloe did on the show to make them think she was wonderful I must have missed something now I thought Jack was normal and he could at least see and admit his faults
nanna7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:24
Captain Kipper
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 9,192
Perhaps because Emma & BOTS are judging her fairly, rather than most here who can't get past their dislike for Chloe.
Congratulations, you are the first ever person to think that BOTS judge any HM fairly.
Captain Kipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:24
Darcyprincess
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 22,673
Perhaps because Emma & BOTS are judging her fairly, rather than most here who can't get past their dislike for Chloe.
I don't agree, I liked Chloe for a long time but her moaning and hypocrisy put me off her!
Darcyprincess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:30
Reality Sucks
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 26,363
Chloe taking the 5000 was justified.

I don't know how many times it has to be said - no one thinks she shouldn't have taken the money, they just found it hypocritical because of all the moralising she did about other people tsking money out of the fund.
Reality Sucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:32
Venetian
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central London
Posts: 8,287
I don't know how many times it has to be said - no one thinks she shouldn't have taken the money, they just found it hypocritical because of all the moralising she did about other people tsking money out of the fund.
This: to the power of a gazillion.
Venetian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:33
annie24601
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,746
Chloe taking the 5000 was justified.
Taking the money is fine. Taking the money after you have whined constantly about other housemates taking money from the winner and treating your supposed friend like crap is not so fine.
annie24601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:34
ChipDouglas82
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Douglas Towers
Posts: 2,614
Congratulations, you are the first ever person to think that BOTS judge any HM fairly.
Well more so than on here anyway!!!
ChipDouglas82 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:35
BabelBrook
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,239
Is Willis playing stupid or is she really that thick?

She still harps on about Chloe getting stick for taking the £5k and Jack not getting any comeback for taking his cash (apart from Chloe's constant jibes at him of course)...if Emma cant see the clear difference then she is a dumbass.
Jack explained why Chloe got some flak quite lucidly in his interview.
BabelBrook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2015, 23:50
benbeez1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 11,976
Chloe taking the 5000 was justified.
yes it was & she won the rest
benbeez1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2015, 11:58
Veri
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90,778
In her interview with Emma, Chloe claimed that the way BB worded it, everyone was going to have the opportunity of 5 grand. Emma did not correct this.

Emma also wasn't just asking Chloe questions about this; she was also putting in a bunch of views of her own (or of the producers) before Chloe could answer. What she said about Jack not getting any stick was just one example.
Veri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2015, 12:16
diesels hummin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,034
I dont know why people dont just accept the fact that there is a big difference between wasting the money in the way Joel and Jack did, or were intending to do ,and accepting £5000 that you can then put to use in an appropriate and value for money way, as Sam and Jack did also.
diesels hummin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2015, 12:33
Venetian
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central London
Posts: 8,287
I dont know why people dont just accept the fact that there is a big difference between wasting the money in the way Joel and Jack did, or were intending to do ,and accepting £5000 that you can then put to use in an appropriate and value for money way, as Sam and Jack did also.
Jack did not waste any money. He asked about spending £4000 on football results etc but when hectored by the other contestants about this withdrew his request, no one can ever know if Jack's request was genuine or was just being done to wind up the others.
Venetian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2015, 12:50
threecheeses
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Left London
Posts: 19,882
I dont know why people dont just accept the fact that there is a big difference between wasting the money in the way Joel and Jack did, or were intending to do ,and accepting £5000 that you can then put to use in an appropriate and value for money way, as Sam and Jack did also.
Actually the big difference is the figure on the screen that Joel and then Jack (attempted to) mess with was just that a figure on a screen and was obviously replaceable, Sam & Chloe's and later on Jack's actions of taking money were actually physically taking money from the winner as these offers were irreplaceable and taking directly from the winner.

Regardless of all that Chloe's actions were hypocritical, not opinion just fact.
threecheeses is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:38.