Is Willis playing stupid or is she really that thick?

She still harps on about Chloe getting stick for taking the £5k and Jack not getting any comeback for taking his cash (apart from Chloe's constant jibes at him of course)...if Emma cant see the clear difference then she is a dumbass.

Just on SOTS saying what a lovely normal girl she is (yet again).

Yes we get what you think (or have been told to think) by now Willis...

I've said it elsewhere but I really don't think she can be watching anymore

She' is too busy with other tv work now.They should give the job to Rylan.

She gets it, she has to follow the script. BB pays her wages

I think she does get it, how can anybody not get it ? I think she just wants to make it seem like Chloe is perfect and can do no wrong.

Maybe thats why she's leaving...theres hope for her yet if she gets out.

Chloe taking the 5000 was justified.

But still made her a hypocrite, and thats why she got some stick over her decision.

But not by Chloe's own criteria for what is justified or not.

I hope so. I've always liked her but she will do far better getting out.

Perhaps because Emma & BOTS are judging her fairly, rather than most here who can't get past their dislike for Chloe.

Yes Chloe was a hypocrite for taking the money when she made such a fuss about everybody else!

I think I watched a different show than the people on bbots just don't see what Chloe did on the show to make them think she was wonderful I must have missed something now I thought Jack was normal and he could at least see and admit his faults

Congratulations, you are the first ever person to think that BOTS judge any HM fairly.

I don't agree, I liked Chloe for a long time but her moaning and hypocrisy put me off her!

I don't know how many times it has to be said - no one thinks she shouldn't have taken the money, they just found it hypocritical because of all the moralising she did about other people tsking money out of the fund.

This: to the power of a gazillion.

Taking the money is fine. Taking the money after you have whined constantly about other housemates taking money from the winner and treating your supposed friend like crap is not so fine.

Well more so than on here anyway!!!

Jack explained why Chloe got some flak quite lucidly in his interview.

yes it was & she won the rest

In her interview with Emma, Chloe claimed that the way BB worded it, everyone was going to have the opportunity of 5 grand. Emma did not correct this.

Emma also wasn't just asking Chloe questions about this; she was also putting in a bunch of views of her own (or of the producers) before Chloe could answer. What she said about Jack not getting any stick was just one example.

I dont know why people dont just accept the fact that there is a big difference between wasting the money in the way Joel and Jack did, or were intending to do ,and accepting £5000 that you can then put to use in an appropriate and value for money way, as Sam and Jack did also.

Jack did not waste any money. He asked about spending £4000 on football results etc but when hectored by the other contestants about this withdrew his request, no one can ever know if Jack's request was genuine or was just being done to wind up the others.

Actually the big difference is the figure on the screen that Joel and then Jack (attempted to) mess with was just that a figure on a screen and was obviously replaceable, Sam & Chloe's and later on Jack's actions of taking money were actually physically taking money from the winner as these offers were irreplaceable and taking directly from the winner.

Regardless of all that Chloe's actions were hypocritical, not opinion just fact.