• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Putting bias aside how many decent housemates did we have
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
Fudd
17-07-2015
Aaron
Danny
Harry
Jack (to an extent)
Jade
Joel
Marc
Nick (to an extent)

They were the ones who really carried the series through different points.
dialectic
17-07-2015
I wonder if Nick hadn't bought his ticket to the final, would he have went before Harry?
KDDS07
17-07-2015
Originally Posted by cah:
“I think they were all decent really ,going from Clips they posted every single H/M was capable of having Fun interesting Conversations etc ,it's just that BB decided to portray a couple of them as being Boring having a Wallpaper edit”

I agree with this. I really wish BB would have just let all the original housemates play out their game. We'll never know now how it would have played out. And really other than maybe "big character" Marc, who was "entertaining" but a one-horse act, the other three sent in were probably more boring than any of the originals--but again--we'll never know now. Maybe Chloe would have been evicted long ago---again----we'll never know.
Fudd
17-07-2015
Originally Posted by dialectic:
“I wonder if Nick hadn't bought his ticket to the final, would he have went before Harry?”

I don't think so. Harry basically signed her own eviction warrant last week.
Lou17
17-07-2015
None we're entirely likable or deserved the win as they contributed minimally but there were some gems that would've shone I believe in other series, and odd entertaining characters but it was a bad mix and had few to bounce off.....

Marc was the entertaining winner for me and contributed the most to this series, even if you didn't like him he shook the house up and made the others come out of th er shells.

Nick, jade and Joel were all individualistic and had true bb characteristics, kinda old skool types (they would've shown much more with a different more energetic and light hearted cast).

Harry too contributed a great deal to the drama and at least danced to her own tune and was quite humble in regards to the money tasks, but I feel she held Nick back from blossoming fully. Both of them stunted each other's journey imo.

Aaron and adjoa had more too offer imo, and feel they could've gone a lot further as they had big characters but needed more time to bloom so to speak.

showbiz and sam were a light hearted relief in a negative house.

The twins seemed decent enough but went early.

The rest of the cast were filler or dislikable/fake.

I can see some positives in this line up but to date it's been the worst bunch. They seemed to be either too similar and playing it safe (boring) or simply unpleasant/not likeable. They seemed to feed each other's negativity and drain one another, all very selfish and individualistic too.
Lou17
17-07-2015
Originally Posted by KDDS07:
“I agree with this. I really wish BB would have just let all the original housemates play out their game. We'll never know now how it would have played out. And really other than maybe "big character" Marc, who was "entertaining" but a one-horse act, the other three sent in were probably more boring than any of the originals--but again--we'll never know now. Maybe Chloe would have been evicted long ago---again----we'll never know.”

A much needed one horse act

I was ready for giving up at that point

I just think this series could've gone completely different had we been given the chance to support our favs in a vote to save rather than those that hate hms the most having a louder say.

We need a permanent change in the voting system or we'll keep getting the deadwood/bores cruising through to the final whilst the larger entertaining/controversial hms leave far to early.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map