• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
What realistically can BB do? Please support the dream!
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
coreyseville
23-07-2015
Originally Posted by Barracute:
“They have to let them know who is up so they can pack their sutcases and get in their eviction outfits”

Make them all pack and get ready for the eviction...they never do a task on Eviction day anyway so they all have time.
Tall Paul
24-07-2015
Also to bring in less hms with agents already like marc and helen last year. Their already pretty rich, so it's pointless of both companies of endemol and c5 to invite em to take part. This is a thing that annoys me greatly about bb on c5 as producers seem to think we like people who already have had some sort of tv experience.

Chloe I don't think had any tv experience whatsoever prior to coming into bb and that's how it should be, nor was she a fame hungry sort. She was just in there for the experience and it I think has benefited her, if bb bosses can pick more people like her with next to no tv appearances then it'll get the show back to its roots.

Also I hope the production team give the presenters better scripts of how to be like. The scripts they give the presenters are full of crap to be honest and pointless. I mean emma was pretty unfair to jade and Sam, I can think it was the production team that fed the questions to her and she had to bite her tongue to giving those sort of questions. To be fair emma doesn't like to be gagged but puts up with it for the money.
adwalton
26-07-2015
Unfortunately, although there are many good ideas in this thread and people are always asking for BB to go back to basics, the producers always think they know best. I suppose most of them are so young and inexperienced that they haven't even seen the earlier versions and just don't want to know.

They obviously believe their audience is as young as themselves and think that conflict and continual arguments are entertaining, and that anything with a grain of sense is boring. You only have to look at the survey they produced which is linked on another thread. There are about six narrow age bands up to 35, then everyone over 35 is lumped together in one category. How stupid. I suppose in their limited minds they don't see any difference between a 36 year old and an 80 year old. Yet I'm sure there are some viewers of all ages in between.
Cats_Eyes
26-07-2015
Originally Posted by yellowfurbaby:
“They've had to cut this season short due to low voting and low advertising revenues. So it's been reported BB have been forced to take drastic action to do these crazy twists to bring in money.
However was the money generated so low because the series cast was so bad? They knew in advance the title of BB wAs time bombed so some of these stunts must have been pre planned.

As a true fan of BB I would like a pure series. Barely any twists or gimmicks.
This is my dream series.

1) 16 HMs at the start. No new blood. However make sure correct interesting HM are chosen. No boring pretty people. Let's have a lively mix of ages, genders, sexuality and ethnicity. Boring dullards piss off.
2) BB stop getting involved in every argument and every slightly risky comment. You don't have to leave let it go as far as fight night way back but FFS leave them alone and stop the meaningless warnings
3) 4 most nominated HM up every week and then a vote to save.
4) please please no fake evictions/secret rooms *yawn*
5) no pass to final. No safe nominations
6) nominations stay secret adding to suspicion and paranoia
7) NO NO NO real world contact. Stop telling the HM what the outside world think!!!
8) LIVE FEED!!!!! Even a couple of hours a day. Even shown online. Anything at all pleaseeeeeeeee.

Basically do you think by leaving HM alone and letting them develop as per old days it'd make more interesting watching and maybe increase revenue. We are ready for this again. What do you think”

But there has never been Live Feed in the true sense of the word - there was aways been a sight delay in order to edit. And to be fair not many people have to chance to watch a live feed or a long period of time.

A longer show in the evening - say 2 hours instead of 1 hours - in order to give us a truer picture of what is actually being - would help a lot.

All your other points I agree with.
Tall Paul
26-07-2015
Originally Posted by adwalton:
“Unfortunately, although there are many good ideas in this thread and people are always asking for BB to go back to basics, the producers always think they know best. I suppose most of them are so young and inexperienced that they haven't even seen the earlier versions and just don't want to know.

They obviously believe their audience is as young as themselves and think that conflict and continual arguments are entertaining, and that anything with a grain of sense is boring. You only have to look at the survey they produced which is linked on another thread. There are about six narrow age bands up to 35, then everyone over 35 is lumped together in one category. How stupid. I suppose in their limited minds they don't see any difference between a 36 year old and an 80 year old. Yet I'm sure there are some viewers of all ages in between.”

They should stop booking in fame hungry sorts as that is messing the show up. Also to get live feed back so we can have stuff to fill up papers. It seems to me that viacom who are new c5 owners couldn't give a monkeys with what we want, as long as they get in their desired audience then they are as happy as Larry.

Trouble is the presenters of emma Willis and Rylan Clark seem happy with the latest format of the show and I believe they have some sort of contribution of what way the show should go. They honestly couldn't care less really, disappointed that Emma doesn't even mention live feed or reply to people, she is so rude like that.

At least jamie East had the decency to reply to tweets, even if he didn't agree with people over things. I think Emmas attitude is disgusting to fans, little wonder why bb is such a mess, because of her contemptuous attitude to people. It's so obvious and I'd love it if the crew could warn her that if she doesn't up her game that she could be given her p45.

I miss jamie East to be honest as he seemed fair with them all, that fairness seems to have slipped because Ben frow is controller of the channel. Think we should organise a petition to get jamie East back onto bbbots as what he said made sense, yet frow thought he wasn't upmarket enough to host. He wanted the tried and trusted sort to host rather than people who've got potential kind of thing.

Hope bb can be planned better for next year, they can start drafting ideas out now as far as I'm concerned now really.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map