BB.

I agree that vote to evict lets the boring housemates stay and you only have to look at the final to see that that happened.

Also to much contact for them from the outside world being aloud to tell them information.

Telly mix has got it spot on.

Next year; no outside info, no crowd, do not let them know who is fav.

Good idea....far to much info was given out this year.....just made a mockery of the show.

If only.

Common sense. Yet the producers seem to lack it .

Anyone got a link to the tellymix article

Here you go

http://www.tellymix.co.uk/reality-tv...bly-wrong.html

Thanks. It's a good article, apart from the usual nonsense about vote to evict. BB14 had vote to evict and was the most successful series on C5. Big characters reached the final too.

The HMs evicted this year were not "the best ones". A couple of them might have been better than the finalists, but most of them were not.

Many of them this year were from agencies...people looking for fame.

It picked up in the last few weeks. It was by no means great but there have been a lot worse.

next year it should be "Big Brother on Benefits " all the contestants are on benefits , well I mean every other show on C5 has gone that route .

.

Agreed.

. .

*applause*

Yet a 'normal' person won Even if she wasn't everyone's cup of tea

Personally I wasn't bothered and switched off as soon as Chloe's name was called out

Won't sink into their pea-brains though that some of us want more 'normal' people instead of these media savvy people who have agents, but as we have seen in this series the people who want constant arguments won't stand for 'normal' people or a slow boil series like we were getting pre 4in4out

If 'normal" means HMs like Chloe, I'd rather have HMs who aren't.

Granted she wasn't the best housemate in the world from what we were permitted to see from the editing suite

And with her winning I just wonder and probably dread what kind of housemates they will recruit for series 17 next year

I could not believe she was 25.....acted 10.

you mean 2 big characters reached the final, the rest were fodder.
the vote to 'evict' thing is not ''nonsense'' only to some people who cant let go of the early channel 4 era.

You should automatically be removed from the auditions if you have an agent.

It's probably authorised already as the next benefit series

No more Danny's; great.

No more Helen's or Marc. Also great.

Chloe was not really a big character - she just sniped from the sidelines and used other people to 'bounce off' As a personality in her own right she was deadly dull.

Agree....she was so boring....cried most of the time.

How much would really have changed though had it been vote to save? Maybe Marc in the final instead of Cristian, but who else would have been greatly benefited? And if Joel couldn't beat Chloe, would Marc have been any different?

I agree with the too much contact with the outside, I think it was done way too early too. Sometimes it's nice to see some outside info get in, so people who think they're beloved get a serious wake-up call, but when they start doing it the first week, it just makes a mockery of the process.

I also think the "legends" nonsense really ruined the series. I can't help but think if the normal BB process had happened during those two weeks of "legend" arguments, that we'd have actually gotten to know the housemates better and wouldn't have thought they were all boring. I actually preferred the show the last week or so because it seemed more reminiscent of what Big Brother is supposed to be.

I think the producers probably miscast the series, too many agreeable housemates, not enough strong personas to start, which made the first few weeks boring, but had they just left everything alone after the four-in, four-out week, I think we would have had a better series for viewing than we did.

I'm not a fan of constant arguments and the producers constantly forcing arguments by revealing secret conversations and hidden facts.