Originally Posted by Harry Redknapp:
“You talk about people falling over to put women down but there you go doing it to Chloe - there is nothing wrong with Chloe.
You'd start complaining if someone was to kick down Helens looks prior to her 45k face reconstruction. Chloe -------------------> Helen.
It's completely low to attack someone over something that cannot be helped (looks). I can't stand when people do that especially when they are over 15.”
Is this satire or just ill judged? I haven't quite worked it out.
I haven't shamed Chloe in the slightest, so you're wrong right off the bat. No ifs or buts, just pain wrong.
IF I were to hypothetically go to the same level re Chloe as people who shame Jasmine do. i'd have perhaps put something like- 'she's a fat ugly blob, with no figure, a hundred and one chins, and a plain, dumpy and oft gormless face'.
I am of course not saying this (it's really not my style) and IF I'd have said the above then you'd at least have a semblance of a point in quoting me. As it stands you're fighting the good fight but in entirely the wrong post code.
I am the one who makes a post saying it's a bad to body shame/ pick people up on their looks and yet out of all the negative comments on Jasmine you ignore all those and decide I am the poster who needs to be told about attacking looks.
You couldn't make this stuff up