|
||||||||
Hollyoaks - Stephanie Davies finally speaks out about her sacking |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 411
|
Hollyoaks - Stephanie Davies finally speaks out about her sacking
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,889
|
What is she saying isn't true? She has been sacked for a reason. So if its not because she turned up drunk what was it for?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 411
|
Quote:
What is she saying isn't true? She has been sacked for a reason. So if its not because she turned up drunk what was it for?
She has dated actors who played... Bart McQueen who she stole from his former long term girlfriend. Freddie Roscoe on and off who is now dating the Grace Black actress. She now has another boyfriend. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,553
|
She's in denial. She needs to get help for whatever problems she has.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,564
|
Quite a dignified response, really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,553
|
Yes apart from that fact she doesn't seem to think she's done anything wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,511
|
She was fired from her job, but is showing no remorse for what she did (and regardless of what she claims, she clearly breached at least one of the terms of her contract - you don't get fired on the spot with immediate effect without good reason). Not even a hint of an apology to the Hollyoaks bods!
I did feel a bit sorry for her (even though the situation was of her own making), but any sympathy I might have had has evaporated! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,553
|
Quote:
She was fired from her job, but is showing no remorse for what she did (and regardless of what she claims, she clearly breached at least one of the terms of her contract - you don't get fired on the spot with immediate effect without good reason). Not even a hint of an apology to the Hollyoaks bods!
I did feel a bit sorry for her (even though the situation was of her own making), but any sympathy I might have had has evaporated! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 641
|
No accountability at all.
A much more dignified approach would have been to say she didn't agree with the sacking, but respected the producer's decision and thanked them for the opportunity she was given. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,511
|
Quote:
Quite a dignified response, really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,564
|
Quote:
A dignified response would have included acknowledgement that she did something wrong and/or some kind of apology to her (now former) employers. Stephanie's response contained neither of these things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,573
|
Quote:
What is she saying isn't true? She has been sacked for a reason. So if its not because she turned up drunk what was it for?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,889
|
Quote:
A dignified response would have included acknowledgement that she did something wrong and/or some kind of apology to her (now former) employers. Stephanie's response contained neither of these things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,889
|
Quote:
She's saying not everything we might have heard is true, but is being suitably vague about it, as I'm sure she has been advised to be. Vague about the past and positive about the future. That's not her - that's her agent/management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,899
|
Her agent was the one who said it...
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,573
|
Quote:
That she wasn't given warnings about her behaviour? That she wasn't fired for being drunk? I don't see what she gains from being like this. It's a situation that calls for her hold her hands up and admit she was in the beenwrong. Trying to score points does her no favours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 411
|
She is a diva!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,854
|
Quote:
Her agent was the one who said it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,564
|
Quote:
She's saying not everything we might have heard is true, but is being suitably vague about it, as I'm sure she has been advised to be. Vague about the past and positive about the future. That's not her - that's her agent/management.
Quote:
No, she has not said any of that. I'm pretty sure her own natural inclination would have I think she has been advised to come out and say something (rather than say nothing and appear defeated), but without actually saying very much at all. It's damage limitation by her management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,553
|
Quote:
Thankyou, that's what I was getting at. She's not making bitchy comments as others did towards her or making further drama out of the whole thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,573
|
Quote:
Exactly. I was surprised how her agents came out and said she had had several warnings before. Usually they would try and spin it but in this case they didn't. An employer can't sack you without warnings and a procedure in this country or you could take then to court. Sounds to me like denial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,564
|
Quote:
Credit to her for not being bitchy but to actually deny it happened isn't much better. If this is her management's idea then it was the wrong decision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sat at computer with heatin on
Posts: 45,573
|
it sounds like her character would do, not the actress herself
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,713
|
Quote:
A dignified response would have included acknowledgement that she did something wrong and/or some kind of apology to her (now former) employers. Stephanie's response contained neither of these things.
Poor old Jonny Larkin's brainchild of the Ste/Sinead storyline won't be seen playing out in all its glory (I am so gutted! *not* ) there's all the extra work of re-writes & re-shooting it creates, and continuity gaps and storyline holes will undoubtedly noticeable. It'll make the show, for a while, an even bigger mess than it is right now. But hey, Steph is fine with everything - no regrets, no apologies, no need to work on her attitude or approach to life and work. She's all good, top of the world. What an arrogant little madam she's coming across as!!! She's going to need to up her game a bit if she wants to get more acting work. Or just carry on as she is, and become a full-time member of the z-list celeb trash circuit. The latter option is looking more likely
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37.




*not* ) there's all the extra work of re-writes & re-shooting it creates, and continuity gaps and storyline holes will undoubtedly noticeable. It'll make the show, for a while, an even bigger mess than it is right now.