Ok, I've posted my point of view too many times already to repeat again so I'll merely end with, I fully 100% agree with her opinions in this article and the other four or five recent articles of hers that I've had the pleasure of reading, roll on next Monday till I see what the next one says

It's one of the few things she's good at, gobbing off. She just sits there and argues with herself and someone writes what she says.

What?!

Where and when did she say this?

What were the circumstances regarding Harry's violent behaviour? Funnily enough i can actually believe it happening!

At least you're now just saying you agree, rather than that what she says must be true.

Didn't we see Harry punch a wall?

of course she accepted the free pass why the hell would you decline it #wtf

go complain to ofcom #boring

If thats what floats your boat, then you're welcome

Yeah, I agree. Its just short burst of sentances rather than anything with substance to it, they don't print it in the paper I don't think...I assume its just an online thing.

That being said I read the Mirror so I wouldn't know

very poorly written indeed. I did read it despite the fact i absolutely can't stand the trash mag that is The Daily Star or The Sun. The fact she gets paid for this pains me. And that picture with her and Marc Snogging and LOVEBIRDS written under it, well that is bloody typhical isn't it. Marc Can't see it yet but he will. Helen is in it for headlines as per.

I wonder if this is true , from Helen ,
"I heard through the grapevine, Mr and Mrs Wisker are perhaps suing Big Brother. Good luck with that. Hope you've got a spare £15-20k to burn, as that's more or less what will happen.
Absolutely no wonder their son behaved as though he's untouchable".


What on Earth reason could THEY have to sue .
BB should return the favour and countersue for them raising an ill tempered thick brat . Not BB's fault if he disgraced himself on telly .
C.A.N.O.E. Roland, get it tattooed on your arm son .

She really is pathetic. It must b true. Its in the star and written by helen haha

I agree with her comment about Danny.

Well at least she refers to violence that we all witnessed with our own eyes from Roland Rat, unlike jasmine claiming crap about Harry .

I agree with the exception of nick!

Lmao at Billy Bhati

I do however think this is a good view point & one most of us if we are really honest do agree with!

Its because its satan herself saying these things & people will never agree openly for fear of what they will be called because they happen to agree with the devil!

Helen was a fantastic housemate & she won her series because people picked their phone up to vote her to win its that simple!

Most bb winners are known for being the most boring & this year is no different, But I don't believe bb has much life left in this show anymore unless we up the stakes & get back to real people real housemates who are original & not copying some other bore who won this show X amount of years ago.

This is my opinion & I am a huge bb fan like most forum members & just wanted to say I agree with most Helen has written & I would agree no matter whom wrote that piece!

It's unsubstantiated. This is another reason why I don't like Helen - what's the point in attacking 2 people who have not put themselves in the public eye. They are not up for discussion. Where the hell are HER parents to tell her to STFU?

You mean the parents that were so busy fighting each other all the time when she was a kid ? The parents that spent so much time yelling and shouting at one another that they had no time for their kid, the ones that didn't know she was cutting herself and didn't notice she'd run away from home at 15 ? The ones that signed her over to social services cos they were too busy getting a divorce ? Those parents you mean ?

BIB, that's it in a nutshell, she's only saying what a lot of us were during the series, yet because it's Helen, who they call the spawn of the devil, "she can't be telling the truth". Well as far as I'm concerned I agree with just about everything she's said there, and I love the fact that she admits that she gets too gobby for her own good sometimes and is trying to get less so. All this "spawn of the devil" is just rubbish when all she's ever been guilty of is being a bit gobby and argumentative. She doesn't pretend to be anyone other than who she is, unlike a lot of them in the house this year.

She didn't attack them , she gave them good advice .Sueing BB would be a waste of money.
BB sees all and keeps the evidence . What we saw may have been just a tiny bit of what Roland boasted/said . I'm sure Roland's parents know that . It's possibly all just grandstanding for attention. Like Roland really .

Helen whether you like her or not is without question the biggest known housemate of the second generation bb in the c5 era.

I'm indifferent to her but her observations of housemates are usually spot on

Can you find me the article where Helen got her information? She is not a friend of the Wisker family and she has zero idea of the lawsuits levied against C5. and his mother has set her twitter to private. Of course she is attacking Dannys parents; her advise is unwarranted and pointless. It is none of her business. She should be worrying about her own behaviour in the public eye affects her own son.

Danny is a dick in her opinion because he did not fall over and tongue her ass like she wanted him to. Had he sucked her ass his dickish qualities would have been a muther effin non factor.

All 6 finalists faced the public vote and made it to the final legitimately, like them or not. They all got on and that's something Negative Nancy Helen cannot fathom. She has no friends.

Jeez dude, your hatred for Helen is bordering on the obsessive.

She writes absolute jibberish. These are the ramblings of a madwoman.

Didn't we see Harry punch a wall?

I thought towards the end she's hinting about doing another show, possibility for I,m a celeb?

This seems like a standard scattergun approach to punditry. Give a load of blunt opinions - generate plenty of firm agreement and strong dissent. Either way it's all good as long as you've got some credibility (which obviously Helen has for many people as a winner of the show).

I don't agree with those who suggest she's 'usually spot on' with her analysis. It's very hit-and-miss for me and lacks coherence. I suspect that those who admire Helen focus more heavily on the points they agree with and vice versa for those who don't.