Originally Posted by sloe_gin:
“I have a sad feeling that 'fully-charged Shaz' is probably a thing of the past, although I prefer 'power-down Shaz' to most other characters.
Why doesn't she work quite as well as before? I think Letitia Dean has had a professional wobble in confidence because the storylining has been nowhere near as iconic as her first stints (Sharongate, Shannis and, oh yeah, Angie n' Den mania in the 80's). Also, maybe the character doesn't work as a middle aged woman? She was initially built as a little princess after all. However, Julie Goodyear managed to dramatise Bet's descent into the depths of menopausal camp tragedy, so you'd have thought they'd go down the same route with Sharon.”
Me too SG!
I spent most of 2014 bemoaning the crap writing for Sharon so I will try to keep this short.
I think as a historic character with so much back story, six years away and a huge unexploded sizzler of a story with Phil about Dennis there was great potential for Shazz to morph into a cross between a Blanche DuBois type character and a vengeful widow.
Sadly she came back at the worst possible time when one incompetent producer was leaving and another one was starting. A lot of damage was done then. Then the competent producer came along but he had his hands full with his own creations and the big anniversary story. That's 3 different producers jerking the character 3 different ways. Other characters suffered, eg Kat, but she suffered most as the important period of reintegration never happened.
I would have preferred her come in for a decently plotted explosive couple of years, then go off again to be honest. But cest la vie. She still keeps me watching.