DS Forums

 
 

16:9 or 15:9 LCD TV's


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13-04-2005, 20:52
DVB Cornwall
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 2,930

I am a little confused - My Tv went pop tonight and am looking online at alternatives.

I have looked at a http://www.sony.co.uk/PageView.do?si...tsku=KLV30HR3B and it shows the aspect ratio as 15:9 rather than 16:9 and it appears to be correct. So what happens to a 16:9 picture when presented does it chop off some of the top and bottom of the screen?

Yours,

Confused of Cornwall.
DVB Cornwall is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 13-04-2005, 20:59
ntlhellworld
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,649
Originally Posted by DVB Cornwall
I am a little confused - My Tv went pop tonight and am looking online at alternatives.

I have looked at a http://www.sony.co.uk/PageView.do?si...tsku=KLV30HR3B and it shows the aspect ratio as 15:9 rather than 16:9 and it appears to be correct. So what happens to a 16:9 picture when presented does it chop off some of the top and bottom of the screen?

Yours,

Confused of Cornwall.
15:9 screens are just a way of the manufacture saving money, the tv will squish a 16:9 picture into a 15:9 frame, so the picture will look horribly compressed, or the other menthod that manufactures are using is lossing a sliver of both sides of the screen!. My advice - avoid 15:9 at all costs.

Content is filmed in 16:9, so watch it on a 16:9 screen!!!, even if if dose cost abit more.
-Chris
ntlhellworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-04-2005, 02:01
Jim Rae
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ayrshire
Posts: 4,125
The Sony is a very elegant widescreen TV - and it's a good one.

It has a resolution of 1280 by 768 which is not at all bad...
Jim Rae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-04-2005, 09:20
GaryB
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: St Albans
Posts: 4,088
Many early LCDs used 15:9 displays as these were the first available. They were originally used in widescreen computer displays where for some reason 15:9 was used. Most of those sets don't use any internal correction for the fact that the display is 15:9 instead of 16:9, indeed some of them even mention 16:9 in their on-screen menus. This means that the pictures can be slightly squashed as ntlhellworld mentioned above.
GaryB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-04-2005, 19:23
freneticvirus
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: glasgow
Posts: 850
then you have the newer 16:10 ratio lcd monitors that are being classed as the normal. it's just all gone wrong.
freneticvirus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-04-2005, 20:39
meltcity
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,770
Not to mention the 1280 x 1024 LCDs that are classed as 4:3 when they are in fact 5:4 - if you set your graphics card to any other resolution you get a squished picture.
meltcity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-04-2005, 20:44
Lyris
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 600
I have the smaller model of that Sony TV - the KLV26HG2. It is an *excellent* display, but sadly not DVI/HDMI/HDCP compatible so don't buy it with SKY HDTV in mind.

But yes, it's a 15:9 screen. It doesn't squash the picture - it clips the sides. The reason we get these odd ratios for screens, I think, is something to do with the fact that manufacturers find it easier to take panels designed for PC resolutions rather than to specally make TV ones.

However many more displays now are using true 16:9 panels.
Lyris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-04-2005, 16:17
DVB Cornwall
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 2,930
Bought this one

http://www.sony.co.uk/PageView.do?si...tsku=KLVL23M1S

which is true 16:9 and goes with the Topfield very well.
DVB Cornwall is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:44.