• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
dtc should be ashamed
<<
<
1 of 4
>>
>
adamlee19
28-07-2015
Lola had so much potential and so much they could have done with her. Yet I'm sure cause she wasn't his creation he didn't want to keep her which is a dam shame. I wouldn't be surprised if he gets rid of jai soon.
sorcha_healy27
28-07-2015
Yes he should bow his head to Internet warriors who think they know better.

I think it is a shame but I would not like the producer of a show to cave in.
Marsh.
28-07-2015
If she's not going to do anything I'd rather her gone.

But that was a piss poor written exit.
John_Smith86
28-07-2015
You realise you are talking about a soap opera character? Why should anyone be ashamed?
Scrabbler
28-07-2015
I am sure he has his reasons.
Sick Bullet
28-07-2015
It's an unpopular axing, DTC is full of himself you'll see when he axes more young quality and gets in actors like Kush for topless scenes.
vald
28-07-2015
He's short sighted, so much potential. Lola and Jay would have been a fabulous couple. And what a crap exit.
vald
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by Sick Bullet:
“It's an unpopular axing, DTC is full of himself you'll see when he axes more young quality and gets in actors like Kush for topless scenes.”

Yes. It's all about Kush, Numartin, Paul and Ben now.
soap-lea
28-07-2015
I think the bbc and eastenders expect their staff to act in a certain way, if they don't then like any other place of employment they get sacked.

The actress completely disappeared at the end of last year in the same way fatboy and dexter did when they were suspended

no one knows what has gone on but he certainly has nothing to be ashamed of
Sick Bullet
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by vald:
“Yes. It's all about Kush, Numartin, Paul and Ben now.”

You got it all dire, but Ben is great.
Marsh.
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by soap-lea:
“I think the bbc and eastenders expect their staff to act in a certain way, if they don't then like any other place of employment they get sacked.

The actress completely disappeared at the end of last year in the same way fatboy and dexter did when they were suspended

no one knows what has gone on but he certainly has nothing to be ashamed of”

I don't remember Danielle Harold ever having a suspension?
0...0
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by soap-lea:
“I think the bbc and eastenders expect their staff to act in a certain way, if they don't then like any other place of employment they get sacked.

The actress completely disappeared at the end of last year in the same way fatboy and dexter did when they were suspended

no one knows what has gone on but he certainly has nothing to be ashamed of”

To be fair, there's no suggestion that the actress has done anything wrong?
NoughtiesMusic
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by vald:
“Yes. It's all about Kush, Numartin, Paul and Ben now.”

I reckon Paul and the Cokers will be high up the next EP's list of characters to be axed when they arrive.
soap-lea
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by Marsh.:
“I don't remember Danielle Harold ever having a suspension?”

they don't broadcast every disciplinary that happens you know and there were rumours arond the time because she just dropped off screen and had gone away with no exot or prior warning when she should of been part of scenes .

Its just my opinion of course but everyone is so quick to blame dtc and say he is being mean but who knows what went on
Dark_Star
28-07-2015
Sadly DTC made it abundantly clear he didnt want Lola by making sure she never had any scenes and has been that way ever since he became producer. It seems the only characters he wants in the show are boring ones.

Whatever your opinion of Hetti Bywater is as an actress, Lucy was a good young interesting character with plenty to offer. However he decided to sacrifice her and being back boring Sonia Fowler. Now he's done the same thing with Danielle. Good actress and Lola is another young character with plenty to offer and axed her so he can bring back the equally boring Libby Fox!

When you add that to the boring Martin Fowler, Paul Coker and Kush its plain to see he's only interested in having boring characters and sadly comes at the expensive of characters that do have something about them.
Scrabbler
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by 0...0:
“To be fair, there's no suggestion that the actress has done anything wrong?”

Same could be said for DTC. I mean we don't know the whole story here, yet the mob is out with their pitchforks.

I can understand people being upset by the characters exit but I think comments like "he should be ashamed" are over the top.

If it was an unpopular character nobody would be fussed about the axing.

Danielle should be well aware of the dangers that come with having an acting career. That's show business.
Marsh.
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by soap-lea:
“they don't broadcast every disciplinary that happens you know”

Translation: I'm making things up because I can.

Carry on love.
sorcha_healy27
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by Scrabbler:
“Same could be said for DTC. I mean we don't know the whole story here, yet the mob is out with their pitchforks.

I can understand people being upset by the characters exit but I think comments like "he should be ashamed" are over the top.

If it was an unpopular character nobody would be fussed about the axing.

Danielle should be well aware of the dangers that come with having an acting career. That's show business.”

Yeah exactly.

I don't remember any outrage when Dexter was axed
Marsh.
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by Dark_Star:
“Sadly DTC made it abundantly clear he didnt want Lola by making sure she never had any scenes and has been that way ever since he became producer. It seems the only characters he wants in the show are boring ones.

Whatever your opinion of Hetti Bywater is as an actress, Lucy was a good young interesting character with plenty to offer. However he decided to sacrifice her and being back boring Sonia Fowler. Now he's done the same thing with Danielle. Good actress and Lola is another young character with plenty to offer and axed her so he can bring back the equally boring Libby Fox!

When you add that to the boring Martin Fowler, Paul Coker and Kush its plain to see he's only interested in having boring characters and sadly comes at the expensive of characters that do have something about them.”

Lucy wasn't axed for Sonia and I highly doubt Lola was axed to accommodate Libby's two episode guest stint.

Please. Get real.
cooler
28-07-2015
When a character leaves a major soap usually news sources say if it's either a mutual decision between the actor and soap or if they've been axed. Strangely, the news sources don't mention whether Danielle was axed or left by mutual consent.
Dark_Star
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by Marsh.:
“Lucy wasn't axed for Sonia and I highly doubt Lola was axed to accommodate Libby's two episode guest stint.

Please. Get real.”

Of course they was, you get rid of current characters to make way for new ones!
Marsh.
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by cooler:
“When a character leaves a major soap usually news sources say if it's either a mutual decision between the actor and soap or if they've been axed. Strangely, the news sources don't mention whether Danielle was axed or left by mutual consent.”

As far as I know the statement said something along the lines of "Danielle Harold will leave after Lola has been written out of the show" tends to mean a story/producer decision to write the character out.
Marsh.
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by Dark_Star:
“Of course they was, you get rid of current characters to make way for new ones!”

Bless you if you think "Who Killed Lucy?" was crafted to allow room for Sonia and Lola has been axed after four years to accommodate a two episode guest star.

You're completely ignoring the other two dozen exits/entrances/returns we've had in addition to them.
vald
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by soap-lea:
“they don't broadcast every disciplinary that happens you know and there were rumours arond the time because she just dropped off screen and had gone away with no exot or prior warning when she should of been part of scenes .

Its just my opinion of course but everyone is so quick to blame dtc and say he is being mean but who knows what went on”

BIB Where ? I saw someone speculating on here, and a few other people jumped on the bandwagon.....before you know it speculation becomes fact. Funny we didn't get these sort of rumours when Aleks and Charlie were axed, or all the other actor's he's given the chop to.

If he thinks the likes of Sonia, Paul and Kush are better than the three characters he's recently axed then I think he's wrong....very wrong.
Dark_Star
28-07-2015
Originally Posted by Marsh.:
“Bless you if you think "Who Killed Lucy?" was crafted to allow room for Sonia and Lola has been axed after four years to accommodate a two episode guest star.

You're completely ignoring the other two dozen exits/entrances/returns we've had in addition to them.”

No the storyline was a desperate attempt to raise viewing figures and well its kinda failed. In any event doesnt change the fact that most of the characters DTC has brought in are boring!
<<
<
1 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map